Tratamiento de mantenimiento con azatioprina o infliximab en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa corticorrefractarios respondedores a las 3 dosis de inducción de infliximab

J. Llaó , J.E. Naves , A. Ruiz-Cerulla , C. Romero , M. Mañosa , T. Lobatón , E. Cabré , J. Guardiola , E. Garcia-Planella , E. Domènech
{"title":"Tratamiento de mantenimiento con azatioprina o infliximab en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa corticorrefractarios respondedores a las 3 dosis de inducción de infliximab","authors":"J. Llaó ,&nbsp;J.E. Naves ,&nbsp;A. Ruiz-Cerulla ,&nbsp;C. Romero ,&nbsp;M. Mañosa ,&nbsp;T. Lobatón ,&nbsp;E. Cabré ,&nbsp;J. Guardiola ,&nbsp;E. Garcia-Planella ,&nbsp;E. Domènech","doi":"10.1016/j.eii.2016.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Infliximab has demonstrated its efficacy in the avoidance of colectomy in the short-medium term in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SRUC). Scarce data are available concerning the best maintenance treatment for patients successfully treated with infliximab induction regimens. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of steroid-refractory patients responding to a 3-infusion with infliximab who have followed maintenance therapy with azathioprine monotherapy or infliximab.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>All patients admitted in 3 centres between January 2005 and December 2011 for moderate-to-severe steroid-refractory flare and who responded to a 3-infusion with infliximab and did not undergo colectomy before week 22 from the first infliximab administration were selected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four patients were included. Maintenance treatment consisted of azathioprine monotherapy in 9 (37%), infliximab in 15 (63%). After a median follow-up of 18 months, corticosteroids were completely withdrawn in all patients. Among those patients who followed azathioprine maintenance monotherapy, infliximab had to be reintroduced in 4 (44%). No colectomies were registered in this group. Among 15 patients who were maintained with infliximab, treatment had to be dose-escalated in 53%. However, infliximab was discontinued because of clinical remission in 9 (65%). Colectomy was required in 4 (16%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with steroid-refractory who avoid early colectomy with a 3-infusion infliximab, infliximab seems to be the best maintenance treatment (even in azathioprine-naïve patients) due to the high proportion of patients who require infliximab reintroduction in case of azathioprine monotherapy maintenance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100473,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal al Día","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eii.2016.06.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal al Día","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1696780116300653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Infliximab has demonstrated its efficacy in the avoidance of colectomy in the short-medium term in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SRUC). Scarce data are available concerning the best maintenance treatment for patients successfully treated with infliximab induction regimens. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of steroid-refractory patients responding to a 3-infusion with infliximab who have followed maintenance therapy with azathioprine monotherapy or infliximab.

Patients and methods

All patients admitted in 3 centres between January 2005 and December 2011 for moderate-to-severe steroid-refractory flare and who responded to a 3-infusion with infliximab and did not undergo colectomy before week 22 from the first infliximab administration were selected.

Results

Twenty-four patients were included. Maintenance treatment consisted of azathioprine monotherapy in 9 (37%), infliximab in 15 (63%). After a median follow-up of 18 months, corticosteroids were completely withdrawn in all patients. Among those patients who followed azathioprine maintenance monotherapy, infliximab had to be reintroduced in 4 (44%). No colectomies were registered in this group. Among 15 patients who were maintained with infliximab, treatment had to be dose-escalated in 53%. However, infliximab was discontinued because of clinical remission in 9 (65%). Colectomy was required in 4 (16%).

Conclusions

In patients with steroid-refractory who avoid early colectomy with a 3-infusion infliximab, infliximab seems to be the best maintenance treatment (even in azathioprine-naïve patients) due to the high proportion of patients who require infliximab reintroduction in case of azathioprine monotherapy maintenance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硫唑嘌呤或英夫利昔单抗对3剂英夫利昔单抗诱导有反应的皮质骨折性溃疡性结肠炎患者的维持治疗
英夫利昔单抗已证明其在类固醇难治性溃疡性结肠炎(SRUC)患者中短期内避免结肠切除术的有效性。关于成功使用英夫利昔单抗诱导治疗的患者的最佳维持治疗的可用数据很少。本研究的目的是比较3次输注英夫利昔单抗的类固醇难治性患者的长期结果,这些患者随后接受单唑嘌呤或英夫利昔单抗维持治疗。患者和方法选择2005年1月至2011年12月期间在3个中心收治的中度至重度类固醇难治性耀斑患者,这些患者对3次英夫利昔单抗输注有反应,并且在第一次使用英夫利昔单抗第22周之前没有进行结肠切除术。结果共纳入24例患者。维持治疗包括9例(37%)硫唑嘌呤单药治疗,15例(63%)英夫利昔单抗治疗。中位随访18个月后,所有患者均完全停用糖皮质激素。在接受硫唑嘌呤维持单药治疗的患者中,有4例(44%)不得不重新引入英夫利昔单抗。本组无结肠登记。在维持英夫利昔单抗治疗的15例患者中,53%的患者必须增加治疗剂量。然而,有9例(65%)患者因临床缓解而停用英夫利昔单抗。4例(16%)需要结肠切除术。结论在3次输注英夫利昔单抗避免早期结肠切除术的类固醇难治性患者中,英夫利昔单抗似乎是最好的维持治疗(即使在azathioprine-naïve患者中),因为在硫唑嘌呤单药维持治疗的情况下,需要重新引入英夫利昔单抗的患者比例很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trombosis venosa cerebral en la enfermedad de Crohn refractaria a tratamiento: aportación de un caso y revisión de una serie de casos pediátricos Investigación clínica en 2016: artículos destacados Papel de las pruebas funcionales anorrectales en la enfermedad perianal: implicaciones para la práctica clínica Afectación de la vía aérea alta en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Descripción de 2 casos Nuevas dianas terapéuticas en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1