Is celecoxib a useful adjunct in the treatment of post-tonsillectomy pain in the adult population? A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Tian-Tee Ng, D. Diamantaras, J. Priestley, J. Redman, N. D. de Silva, V. Mahanta
{"title":"Is celecoxib a useful adjunct in the treatment of post-tonsillectomy pain in the adult population? A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study","authors":"Tian-Tee Ng, D. Diamantaras, J. Priestley, J. Redman, N. D. de Silva, V. Mahanta","doi":"10.1017/S0022215116009476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for pain management in post-tonsillectomy adult patients. Design: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial was conducted in an adult population (aged 18–55 years), with a parallel group design using an allocation ratio of 1:1. Methods: Eighty patients underwent elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy, operated on by one surgeon. They were discharged home with randomly assigned celecoxib or placebo, together with regular post-tonsillectomy medications (paracetamol and Endone). Pain scores were measured from post-operative days 1 to 10. All patients were assessed on post-operative days 5, 12 and 28. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the daily or overall pain scores, the total intake of Endone, or the time taken to achieve freedom from pain after tonsillectomy between the study arms (n = 40 each arm). The celecoxib-treated group experienced significantly more vomiting (celecoxib vs placebo p < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test), confidence interval = 0.57 to 0.76). Conclusion: Celecoxib usage was associated with significantly more vomiting and did not reduce narcotic analgesia requirement post-tonsillectomy.","PeriodicalId":22781,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Laryngology &#x0026; Otology","volume":"33 1-2","pages":"S18 - S28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Laryngology &#x0026; Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for pain management in post-tonsillectomy adult patients. Design: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial was conducted in an adult population (aged 18–55 years), with a parallel group design using an allocation ratio of 1:1. Methods: Eighty patients underwent elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy, operated on by one surgeon. They were discharged home with randomly assigned celecoxib or placebo, together with regular post-tonsillectomy medications (paracetamol and Endone). Pain scores were measured from post-operative days 1 to 10. All patients were assessed on post-operative days 5, 12 and 28. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the daily or overall pain scores, the total intake of Endone, or the time taken to achieve freedom from pain after tonsillectomy between the study arms (n = 40 each arm). The celecoxib-treated group experienced significantly more vomiting (celecoxib vs placebo p < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test), confidence interval = 0.57 to 0.76). Conclusion: Celecoxib usage was associated with significantly more vomiting and did not reduce narcotic analgesia requirement post-tonsillectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞来昔布是治疗成人扁桃体切除术后疼痛的有效辅助药物吗?一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的研究
摘要目的:评价塞来昔布治疗成人扁桃体切除术后疼痛的疗效和安全性。设计:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期临床试验在成年人(18-55岁)中进行,采用平行组设计,分配比例为1:1。方法:80例患者均行选择性扁桃体切除术或腺扁桃体切除术。他们出院时随机分配塞来昔布或安慰剂,以及常规扁桃体切除术后药物(扑热息痛和Endone)。从术后第1天至第10天测量疼痛评分。所有患者于术后第5、12和28天进行评估。结果:两组患者的每日疼痛评分、总体疼痛评分、Endone的总摄入量、扁桃体切除术后疼痛消除所需时间均无统计学差异(每组40例)。塞来昔布治疗组呕吐明显增多(塞来昔布vs安慰剂p < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney检验),置信区间= 0.57 ~ 0.76)。结论:塞来昔布的使用与扁桃体切除术后呕吐明显增加相关,并没有减少麻醉镇痛需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHORDOMAS: TECHNOLOGIES, TECHNIQUES, AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES M N Pamir, O Al-Mefty, L A B Borba Thieme, 2017 ISBN 978 1 62623 159 7 pp 239 Price €179.99 £160.50 JLO volume 132 issue 5 Cover and Back matter JLO volume 132 issue 5 Cover and Front matter FUNDAMENTALS OF NEUROLOGY: AN ILLUSTRATED GUIDE, 2nd edn H Mattle, M Mumenthaler Thieme, 2017 ISBN 978 3 13136 452 4 pp 456 Price €69.99 £62.50 RHOTON'S ATLAS OF HEAD, NECK, AND BRAIN: 2D AND 3D IMAGES M Peris-Celda, F Martinez-Soriano, A L Rhoton Jr (eds) Thieme, 2017 ISBN 978 1 60406 900 6 pp 648 Price £233.00
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1