Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) intralesional infiltrations: From the bench to the diabetic ulcers cells

J. Berlanga-Acosta, Y. Mendoza-Marí, Ariana García-Ojalvo, Jose Angel Acosta-Buxado, M. Fernández-Mayola, G. Nieto
{"title":"Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) intralesional infiltrations: From the bench to the diabetic ulcers cells","authors":"J. Berlanga-Acosta, Y. Mendoza-Marí, Ariana García-Ojalvo, Jose Angel Acosta-Buxado, M. Fernández-Mayola, G. Nieto","doi":"10.15761/IMM.1000354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes mellitus remains with an ever-increasing prevalence, indefectibly associated to progressive and irreversible complications. Diabetic lower extremities ulcerations contribute to amputations, disability, and mortality. Ulcers result from a wound healing failure characterized by proliferative arrest, apoptosis, and senescence of granulation tissue-producing cells. Diabetic wounds are also distinguished by an inflamed, toxic, and degradative environment, acting as deterrents for local growth factors availability and receptors’ physiology. The emergence of growth factors caused expectation as biological modifiers for wounds repair arrest. The clinical introduction of growth factors was precocious when critical pieces of chronicity pathophysiology and growth factors pharmacology remained elusive. Mounting observations indicated that topical administration of these agents failed by the effect of local proteolysis, narrow bioavailability window, inadequate local kinetics/ diffusion, and a regenerating polymicrobial biofilm. As an alternative to circumvent these pharmacodynamics obstacles as to preserve EGF biological capabilities, we developed a series of experiments which provided the rationale and fundamentals for an intra-ulcer infiltrative delivery route. The clinical development program has included from a proof-of-concept to post-marketing studies in poor-prognosis ischemic, neuropathic and neuroischemic wounds. Along 18 years of clinical progress more than 259 000 patients were treated. As demonstrated by pharmacovigilance studies, aside from the success in the primary healing, the infiltrated EGF accounted for a reduction of amputation risks, negligible rates of annual recurrence, and prolonging survival of the healed patients. This pharmacological intervention is added to conventional treatments and surgical procedures. Infiltrated EGF has proved to reverse wound cells arrest being efficacious and safe for long terms of follow up. Brief reflections on diabetes and the wound healing failure Since the seminal contribution of Banting and Best diabetes treatment was revolutionized. Hereafter, insulin therapy eliminated ketoacidosis as a principal cause of death among diabetics who enjoyed a longer lifespan. However, traditional insulin therapy combined with emerging novel approaches did not translate into a significant reduction of major complications that nowadays lead to morbidity and mortality [1]. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2-DM) is a heterogeneous and complex process comprising multiple pathogenic factors [2] and multi-organs complications’ that remain as a challenge for scientists and clinicians. T2-DM has progressively expanded as a pandemic condition accounting for 90% to 95% of all the diabetic population [3,4]. Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is one of the most frightened diabetic complications, leading to amputation-disability, social exclusion and early mortality [5]. The lifetime incidence of foot ulcers has been estimated to reach up to 34% of subjects with diabetes whereas diabetes-related lower extremity complications affect about 159 million people worldwide [6,7]. Accordingly, diabetic population still contributes to 80% of all non-traumatic lower extremities amputations around the world [8]. An illuminating review by Armstrong and coworkers prompted for the first time to distinguish the ulcer healing process not as the mere route for limb salvage, but as the foremost alternative to prevent early mortality. The 5-year relative mortality rate after limb amputation in diabetics rises to 68% only preceded by lung cancer [9]. *Correspondence to: Jorge Berlanga-Acosta, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Havana, Cuba, E-mail: jorge.berlanga@cigb.edu.cu","PeriodicalId":94322,"journal":{"name":"Integrative molecular medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative molecular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/IMM.1000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus remains with an ever-increasing prevalence, indefectibly associated to progressive and irreversible complications. Diabetic lower extremities ulcerations contribute to amputations, disability, and mortality. Ulcers result from a wound healing failure characterized by proliferative arrest, apoptosis, and senescence of granulation tissue-producing cells. Diabetic wounds are also distinguished by an inflamed, toxic, and degradative environment, acting as deterrents for local growth factors availability and receptors’ physiology. The emergence of growth factors caused expectation as biological modifiers for wounds repair arrest. The clinical introduction of growth factors was precocious when critical pieces of chronicity pathophysiology and growth factors pharmacology remained elusive. Mounting observations indicated that topical administration of these agents failed by the effect of local proteolysis, narrow bioavailability window, inadequate local kinetics/ diffusion, and a regenerating polymicrobial biofilm. As an alternative to circumvent these pharmacodynamics obstacles as to preserve EGF biological capabilities, we developed a series of experiments which provided the rationale and fundamentals for an intra-ulcer infiltrative delivery route. The clinical development program has included from a proof-of-concept to post-marketing studies in poor-prognosis ischemic, neuropathic and neuroischemic wounds. Along 18 years of clinical progress more than 259 000 patients were treated. As demonstrated by pharmacovigilance studies, aside from the success in the primary healing, the infiltrated EGF accounted for a reduction of amputation risks, negligible rates of annual recurrence, and prolonging survival of the healed patients. This pharmacological intervention is added to conventional treatments and surgical procedures. Infiltrated EGF has proved to reverse wound cells arrest being efficacious and safe for long terms of follow up. Brief reflections on diabetes and the wound healing failure Since the seminal contribution of Banting and Best diabetes treatment was revolutionized. Hereafter, insulin therapy eliminated ketoacidosis as a principal cause of death among diabetics who enjoyed a longer lifespan. However, traditional insulin therapy combined with emerging novel approaches did not translate into a significant reduction of major complications that nowadays lead to morbidity and mortality [1]. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2-DM) is a heterogeneous and complex process comprising multiple pathogenic factors [2] and multi-organs complications’ that remain as a challenge for scientists and clinicians. T2-DM has progressively expanded as a pandemic condition accounting for 90% to 95% of all the diabetic population [3,4]. Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is one of the most frightened diabetic complications, leading to amputation-disability, social exclusion and early mortality [5]. The lifetime incidence of foot ulcers has been estimated to reach up to 34% of subjects with diabetes whereas diabetes-related lower extremity complications affect about 159 million people worldwide [6,7]. Accordingly, diabetic population still contributes to 80% of all non-traumatic lower extremities amputations around the world [8]. An illuminating review by Armstrong and coworkers prompted for the first time to distinguish the ulcer healing process not as the mere route for limb salvage, but as the foremost alternative to prevent early mortality. The 5-year relative mortality rate after limb amputation in diabetics rises to 68% only preceded by lung cancer [9]. *Correspondence to: Jorge Berlanga-Acosta, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Havana, Cuba, E-mail: jorge.berlanga@cigb.edu.cu
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表皮生长因子(EGF)病灶内浸润:从工作台到糖尿病溃疡细胞
糖尿病的患病率不断上升,与进行性和不可逆并发症不可避免地相关。糖尿病下肢溃疡导致截肢、残疾和死亡。溃疡是由伤口愈合失败引起的,其特征是增生停止、细胞凋亡和肉芽组织生成细胞衰老。糖尿病伤口还以炎症、有毒和降解的环境为特征,对局部生长因子的可用性和受体的生理机能起威慑作用。生长因子的出现引起了人们对创伤修复阻滞生物修饰剂的期待。当慢性病理生理学和生长因子药理学的关键部分仍然难以捉摸时,生长因子的临床引入是早熟的。越来越多的观察表明,由于局部蛋白水解、狭窄的生物利用度窗口、局部动力学/扩散不足以及再生的多微生物生物膜的影响,这些药物的局部施用失败。为了规避这些药效学障碍并保持EGF的生物学能力,我们开展了一系列实验,为溃疡内浸润给药途径提供了基本原理和基础。临床开发项目包括从概念验证到上市后对预后不良的缺血性、神经性和神经缺血性伤口的研究。在18年的临床进展中,治疗了25.9万多名患者。药物警戒研究表明,除了原发性愈合的成功,浸润的EGF还降低了截肢风险,年复发率可以忽略不计,并延长了愈合患者的生存期。这种药物干预被添加到常规治疗和外科手术中。浸润的EGF已被证明可以逆转伤口细胞阻滞,在长期随访中是有效和安全的。对糖尿病和伤口愈合失败的简要反思自从班廷和贝斯特的开创性贡献以来糖尿病治疗是革命性的。此后,胰岛素治疗消除了酮症酸中毒这一长寿糖尿病患者死亡的主要原因。然而,传统的胰岛素治疗与新兴的新方法相结合并没有显著减少目前导致发病率和死亡率的主要并发症[1]。2型糖尿病(T2-DM)是一个异质性复杂的过程,包括多种致病因素[2]和多器官并发症,这对科学家和临床医生来说仍然是一个挑战。t2dm已逐渐扩大为一种大流行疾病,占所有糖尿病人群的90%至95%[3,4]。糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是最可怕的糖尿病并发症之一,可导致截肢残疾、社会排斥和早期死亡[5]。据估计,糖尿病患者一生中足部溃疡的发病率高达34%,而全球约有1.59亿人患有糖尿病相关的下肢并发症[6,7]。因此,糖尿病患者仍占全球非创伤性下肢截肢的80%[8]。Armstrong和他的同事们发表的一篇有启发性的综述,首次促使人们认识到溃疡愈合过程不仅仅是挽救肢体的途径,而且是预防早期死亡的首要选择。糖尿病截肢后的5年相对死亡率上升至68%,仅肺癌先行[9]。通讯:Jorge Berlanga-Acosta,基因工程和生物技术中心,哈瓦那,古巴,E-mail: jorge.berlanga@cigb.edu.cu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOX30 might not be associated with Sertoli cell-only syndrome in azoospermic Japanese men Two genetic disorders (TRMU and SCYL1) explaining transient infantile liver failure in one patient COVID-19: Search for Therapeutics Comparison of ex-vivo organ culture and cell culture to study drug efficiency and virus-host interactions NL63: A Better Surrogate Virus for studying SARS-CoV-2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1