Jill Ashburner, Victoria Tomkins, Natasha Bobir, Judy Jones, David Smith, Jermu Hautsalo, Elena Swift
{"title":"Co-Design and Co-Production of a Goal Setting Tool for Autistic Adolescents and Adults.","authors":"Jill Ashburner, Victoria Tomkins, Natasha Bobir, Judy Jones, David Smith, Jermu Hautsalo, Elena Swift","doi":"10.1089/aut.2021.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A review of existing tools suggested a need for a goal setting tool for autistic people that (1) addresses the heterogeneity of autistic people to the greatest degree possible; (2) addresses a broad range of goals in areas including self-care and home living, and social, community, educational, and employment participation; (3) incorporates autism-specific adaptations such as visual supports; (4) facilitates the initial identification of goals; and (5) enables the prioritization of goals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This project aimed to develop a picture-based card-sort goal setting tool with relevant and comprehensible goal cards using a co-design and co-production process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first three of four phases of participatory action research (PAR) used to develop the tool are presented, including (1) initial design by autistic people and professional practitioners, and co-production with an autistic graphic designer; (2) survey of 15 autistic people and 11 family members to evaluate and refine the goals, pictures, and wording; (3) second survey of 23 autistic people and 19 family members to re-evaluate and re-refine the goals, pictures, and wording.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses to open-ended survey questions recommended changing many of the pictures and some of the words on the goal cards. As the majority of respondents rated each of the 72 goals as important, they were all retained. The mean percentage approval of the pictures improved from 78% for survey 1 to 86% for survey 2. The mean percentage approval of the wording improved from 87% for survey 1 to 97% for survey 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a co-design and co-production methodology over three phases of PAR involving autistic people and their families resulted in many refinements to the goal cards. These iterations in the design process maximized the extent to which the goal cards are easily understood and relevant to the needs of autistic people.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"5 1","pages":"37-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A review of existing tools suggested a need for a goal setting tool for autistic people that (1) addresses the heterogeneity of autistic people to the greatest degree possible; (2) addresses a broad range of goals in areas including self-care and home living, and social, community, educational, and employment participation; (3) incorporates autism-specific adaptations such as visual supports; (4) facilitates the initial identification of goals; and (5) enables the prioritization of goals.
Aim: This project aimed to develop a picture-based card-sort goal setting tool with relevant and comprehensible goal cards using a co-design and co-production process.
Methods: The first three of four phases of participatory action research (PAR) used to develop the tool are presented, including (1) initial design by autistic people and professional practitioners, and co-production with an autistic graphic designer; (2) survey of 15 autistic people and 11 family members to evaluate and refine the goals, pictures, and wording; (3) second survey of 23 autistic people and 19 family members to re-evaluate and re-refine the goals, pictures, and wording.
Results: Responses to open-ended survey questions recommended changing many of the pictures and some of the words on the goal cards. As the majority of respondents rated each of the 72 goals as important, they were all retained. The mean percentage approval of the pictures improved from 78% for survey 1 to 86% for survey 2. The mean percentage approval of the wording improved from 87% for survey 1 to 97% for survey 2.
Conclusions: The use of a co-design and co-production methodology over three phases of PAR involving autistic people and their families resulted in many refinements to the goal cards. These iterations in the design process maximized the extent to which the goal cards are easily understood and relevant to the needs of autistic people.