Shorting activity and stock return predictability: Evidence from a mandatory disclosure shock

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Management Pub Date : 2021-03-19 DOI:10.1111/fima.12351
Paul A. Griffin, Hyun A. Hong, Ivalina Kalcheva, Jeong-Bon Kim
{"title":"Shorting activity and stock return predictability: Evidence from a mandatory disclosure shock","authors":"Paul A. Griffin,&nbsp;Hyun A. Hong,&nbsp;Ivalina Kalcheva,&nbsp;Jeong-Bon Kim","doi":"10.1111/fima.12351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study the effect of a mandatory improvement in public disclosure due to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on the stock return predictability of shorting activity. To assess the impact of the disclosure shock, we measure monthly changes in the demand for and supply of stocks for shorting and whether those changes predict negative returns in the following month. We provide international evidence that the ability of increases in shorting demand and supply to predict negative returns declines after the shock. The predictive ability of shorting in the month before a negative earnings surprise and news of a firm's questionable merger and acquisitions transaction also declines after the shock. These findings imply that the shock of the mandatory accounting change crowds out some of short-sellers’ value-relevant information in the equity lending market. Thus, although the democratization of information from a structured accounting change may make sophisticated investors worse off by reducing their ability to predict future returns, this change may also benefit all investors through timely stock price discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48123,"journal":{"name":"Financial Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/fima.12351","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fima.12351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the effect of a mandatory improvement in public disclosure due to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on the stock return predictability of shorting activity. To assess the impact of the disclosure shock, we measure monthly changes in the demand for and supply of stocks for shorting and whether those changes predict negative returns in the following month. We provide international evidence that the ability of increases in shorting demand and supply to predict negative returns declines after the shock. The predictive ability of shorting in the month before a negative earnings surprise and news of a firm's questionable merger and acquisitions transaction also declines after the shock. These findings imply that the shock of the mandatory accounting change crowds out some of short-sellers’ value-relevant information in the equity lending market. Thus, although the democratization of information from a structured accounting change may make sophisticated investors worse off by reducing their ability to predict future returns, this change may also benefit all investors through timely stock price discovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卖空活动与股票回报可预测性:来自强制性披露冲击的证据
我们研究了由于采用国际财务报告准则(IFRS)而强制改进公开披露对卖空活动的股票收益可预测性的影响。为了评估披露冲击的影响,我们测量了卖空股票需求和供应的月度变化,以及这些变化是否预测了下个月的负回报。我们提供的国际证据表明,卖空需求和供应的增加预测负回报的能力在冲击后下降。在出现负面收益意外和公司可疑并购交易消息前一个月做空的预测能力,在受到冲击后也会下降。这些研究结果表明,强制性会计变更的冲击会挤出股权贷款市场中一些卖空者的价值相关信息。因此,尽管结构化会计变化带来的信息民主化可能会降低老练投资者预测未来回报的能力,从而使他们处境更糟,但这种变化也可能通过及时发现股价而使所有投资者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Management
Financial Management BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Financial Management (FM) serves both academics and practitioners concerned with the financial management of nonfinancial businesses, financial institutions, and public or private not-for-profit organizations.
期刊最新文献
Does common institutional ownership mitigate hold‐up problems along the supply chain? Issue Information Announcements Institutional trading around M&A announcements Disagreement exploitation and the cross‐section of hedge fund performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1