Making NEPA more effective and economical for the new millennium

Roger P. Hansen, Theodore A. Wolff
{"title":"Making NEPA more effective and economical for the new millennium","authors":"Roger P. Hansen,&nbsp;Theodore A. Wolff","doi":"10.1002/ffej.3330110307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article focuses on a ten-element strategy for “streamlining” the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process in order to achieve the Act's objectives while easing the considerable burden on agencies, the public, and the judicial system. In other words, this article proposes a strategy for making NEPA work better and cost less. How these ten elements are timed and implemented is critical to any successful streamlining.</p><p>The strategy elements discussed in this paper, in no particular order of priority, are as follows: (1) integrate the NEPA process with other environmental compliance and review procedures; (2) accelerate the decision time for determining the appropriate level of NEPA documentation; (3) conduct early and thorough internal environmental impact statement (EIS) (or environmental assessment [EA]) scoping before public scoping or other public participation begins; (4) organize and implement public scoping processes that are more participatory than confrontational; (5) maintain an up-to-date compendium of environmental “baseline” information; (6) prepare more comprehensive, broad-scope “umbrella” EISs that can be used effectively for tiering; (7) encourage preparation of annotated outlines with detailed guidance that serve as a “road map” for preparation of each EIS or EA; (8) decrease the length and complexity of highly technical portions of NEPA documents; (9) increase and systematize NEPA compliance outreach, training, and organizational support; and (10) work diligently to influence the preparation of better organized, shorter, and more readable NEPA documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":100523,"journal":{"name":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ffej.3330110307","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffej.3330110307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article focuses on a ten-element strategy for “streamlining” the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process in order to achieve the Act's objectives while easing the considerable burden on agencies, the public, and the judicial system. In other words, this article proposes a strategy for making NEPA work better and cost less. How these ten elements are timed and implemented is critical to any successful streamlining.

The strategy elements discussed in this paper, in no particular order of priority, are as follows: (1) integrate the NEPA process with other environmental compliance and review procedures; (2) accelerate the decision time for determining the appropriate level of NEPA documentation; (3) conduct early and thorough internal environmental impact statement (EIS) (or environmental assessment [EA]) scoping before public scoping or other public participation begins; (4) organize and implement public scoping processes that are more participatory than confrontational; (5) maintain an up-to-date compendium of environmental “baseline” information; (6) prepare more comprehensive, broad-scope “umbrella” EISs that can be used effectively for tiering; (7) encourage preparation of annotated outlines with detailed guidance that serve as a “road map” for preparation of each EIS or EA; (8) decrease the length and complexity of highly technical portions of NEPA documents; (9) increase and systematize NEPA compliance outreach, training, and organizational support; and (10) work diligently to influence the preparation of better organized, shorter, and more readable NEPA documents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使《国家环境政策法》在新千年更加有效和经济
本文重点讨论了“精简”《国家环境政策法》(NEPA)过程的十项策略,以实现该法案的目标,同时减轻机构、公众和司法系统的沉重负担。换句话说,本文提出了一种策略,使NEPA工作得更好,成本更低。如何把握这十个元素的时间并执行它们对于任何成功的流线型都至关重要。本文讨论的战略要素不分先后顺序如下:(1)将《国家环境政策法》程序与其他环境合规和审查程序相结合;(2)加快确定《国家环境政策法》文件级别的决策时间;(3)在公众界定范围或其他公众参与开始之前,及早和彻底地进行内部环境影响报告书(或环境评估)的界定;(4)组织和实施更具参与性而非对抗性的公共范围界定过程;(5)保持最新的环境“基线”资料汇编;(6)编制更全面、范围更广、可有效用于分层的“伞形”生态系统;(7)鼓励拟备附有详细指引的注释大纲,作为拟备“环境影响报告书”或“环境影响评估”的“路线图”;(8)减少国家环境政策文件中技术性强的部分的长度和复杂性;(9)增加并系统化《国家环境政策法》合规宣传、培训和组织支持;(10)努力影响编制更有条理、更短、更可读的《国家环境政策法》文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
วัตถุประสงค์และภารกิจของกฎหมายส่งเสริมเศรษฐกิจหมุนเวียน การประเมินผลกระทบทางสุขภาพจากการผลิตทางการเกษตร: แนวคิดและการปฏิบัติสู่ข้อเสนอเชิงนโยบายสาธารณะเพื่อสุขภาพ พื้นผิวภายในอาคาร: เหตุใดจึงสำคัญต่อคุณภาพอากาศภายในอาคาร หลักการเก็บค่าธรรมเนียมการจัดการมูลฝอยตามปริมาณ ที่ทิ้ง ตอนที่ 1 กรณีศึกษาและถอดบทเรียนของนานาประเทศ นวัตกรรมทางสังคมกับการบริหารจัดการน้ำเพื่อรับมือภัยแล้ง – กรณีศึกษาวิสาหกิจชุมชนกลุ่มผู้ปลูกไผ่ อำเภอท่าตะเกียบ จังหวัดฉะเชิงเทรา
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1