Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS British Journal of Politics & International Relations Pub Date : 2012-11-21 DOI:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x
Timothy Heppell
{"title":"Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers","authors":"Timothy Heppell","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article:</p>\n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Contributes to the development of academic research on the internal dynamics of the Conservative Party under the leadership of David Cameron.</li>\n \n <li>Contributes to the development of academic research on the processes of ministerial selection within British Government.</li>\n \n <li>Contributes to the development of academic research on cohort effects within parties, and the analysis of comparisons and differences between different parliamentary cohorts.</li>\n \n <li>Contributes to the development of academic research on the constraints upon Prime Ministerial power when in coalition.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>This article identifies the ideological composition of the parliamentary Conservative party (PCP) in order to determine the location and numeric strength of the critics of Cameron. By constructing a data set of attitudes across two ideological divides—the social, sexual and morality divide and the European divide—the article identifies the following. First, despite Cameron's social liberal emphasis both the PCP and his ministerial team is predominantly Thatcherite—i.e. socially conservative. Second, despite numerically having a Eurosceptic PCP and ministerial team, with Europhilia now an inconsequential rump, Cameron faces a minority ‘hard’ Eurosceptic faction of rebels who oppose his ‘soft’ Euroscepticism. Third, the influx of new parliamentarians elected in 2010 may increase social liberal strength, but they are overwhelmingly Eurosceptic, with a significant tranche of hard Eurosceptics amongst them. Finally, through a process of ideological mapping of these two ideological divides the research identifies a core of 50 socially conservative <i>and</i> hard Eurosceptics who are the critics of Cameron.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"15 3","pages":"340-361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

This article:

  • Contributes to the development of academic research on the internal dynamics of the Conservative Party under the leadership of David Cameron.
  • Contributes to the development of academic research on the processes of ministerial selection within British Government.
  • Contributes to the development of academic research on cohort effects within parties, and the analysis of comparisons and differences between different parliamentary cohorts.
  • Contributes to the development of academic research on the constraints upon Prime Ministerial power when in coalition.

This article identifies the ideological composition of the parliamentary Conservative party (PCP) in order to determine the location and numeric strength of the critics of Cameron. By constructing a data set of attitudes across two ideological divides—the social, sexual and morality divide and the European divide—the article identifies the following. First, despite Cameron's social liberal emphasis both the PCP and his ministerial team is predominantly Thatcherite—i.e. socially conservative. Second, despite numerically having a Eurosceptic PCP and ministerial team, with Europhilia now an inconsequential rump, Cameron faces a minority ‘hard’ Eurosceptic faction of rebels who oppose his ‘soft’ Euroscepticism. Third, the influx of new parliamentarians elected in 2010 may increase social liberal strength, but they are overwhelmingly Eurosceptic, with a significant tranche of hard Eurosceptics amongst them. Finally, through a process of ideological mapping of these two ideological divides the research identifies a core of 50 socially conservative and hard Eurosceptics who are the critics of Cameron.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡梅伦和自由保守主义:议会保守党和保守党部长的态度
本文:对戴维·卡梅伦领导下保守党内部动态的学术研究的发展有所贡献。促进英国政府内部部长选拔过程的学术研究发展。有助于发展政党内部队列效应的学术研究,并分析不同议会队列之间的比较和差异。有助于对联合政府中总理权力约束的学术研究的发展。本文确定了议会保守党(PCP)的意识形态组成,以确定卡梅伦批评者的位置和数量实力。通过构建一个跨越两种意识形态鸿沟——社会、性和道德鸿沟以及欧洲鸿沟——的态度数据集,文章确定了以下几点。首先,尽管卡梅伦强调社会自由主义,但PCP和他的部长团队都主要是撒切尔式的。社会保守。其次,尽管在数量上有一个疑欧派的PCP和部长团队,亲欧派现在是无关紧要的残余,卡梅伦面临着少数“硬”疑欧派的反叛,他们反对他的“软”疑欧派。第三,2010年当选的新议员的涌入可能会增加社会自由主义的力量,但他们绝大多数是欧洲怀疑论者,其中有相当一部分是顽固的欧洲怀疑论者。最后,通过对这两种意识形态分歧的意识形态映射过程,研究确定了50名社会保守派和顽固的欧洲怀疑论者,他们是卡梅伦的批评者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Finding the common good in divided societies: The benefits of self-interest in transitional justice interactions. Crisis politics of dehumanisation during COVID-19: A framework for mapping the social processes through which dehumanisation undermines human dignity. Britain's COVID-19 battle: The role of political leaders in shaping the responses to the pandemic. COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and the failure of global cooperation. Alcohol policy, multi-level governance and corporate political strategy: The campaign for Scotland's minimum unit pricing in Edinburgh, London and Brussels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1