Response Inhibition and Interference Control in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.28192
Hidayet Ece Arat Çelik, Suat Küçükgöncü, Ayşe Erdoğan, Ayşegül Özerdem
{"title":"Response Inhibition and Interference Control in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Hidayet Ece Arat Çelik,&nbsp;Suat Küçükgöncü,&nbsp;Ayşe Erdoğan,&nbsp;Ayşegül Özerdem","doi":"10.29399/npa.28192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among the executive functions affected in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), inhibitory control is one of the primary areas of impairment, characterized by components that include response inhibition and interference control. Determining the impaired inhibitory control components will be useful in the differential diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. The present study aimed to investigate response inhibition and interference control abilities of adults with ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 42 adults diagnosed with ADHD and 43 healthy controls. The stop-signal task (SST) and Stroop test were used for assessing the response inhibition and interference control, respectively. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used for comparing the ADHD and healthy control groups in terms of their SST and Stroop test scores, wherein the age and education level of the participants were taken as covariables. The relationship between SST and Stroop Test and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) was tested by Pearson correlation analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparing the test scores between those who were administered with psychostimulants among the adults with ADHD and those who were not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response inhibition was observed to be impaired in adults with ADHD compared with the healthy controls, whereas no difference regarding interference control was observed. As per the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), a weak and moderately negative relationship was found between the stop signal delay and the attentional, motor, non-planning scores, and total scores and a weak positive relationship was found between the stop-signal reaction time and the attentional, motor, non-planning scores, and total scores. A significant improvement was observed in the response inhibition skills of the adults with ADHD who had received methylphenidate treatment compared to those who had not, and the former also showed lower impulsivity levels as measured by the BIS-11.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It should be noted that response inhibition and interference control, which are considered under the umbrella of inhibitory control, may exhibit different characteristics in adult individuals diagnosed with ADHD and this is important for differential diagnosis. An improvement was observed in the response inhibition of adults with ADHD caused by psychostimulant treatment, which was associated with positive outcomes that were also noticeable by the patients. Understanding the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of the condition would further facilitate the development of appropriate treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51142,"journal":{"name":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999224/pdf/archneuro-60-3.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.28192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Among the executive functions affected in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), inhibitory control is one of the primary areas of impairment, characterized by components that include response inhibition and interference control. Determining the impaired inhibitory control components will be useful in the differential diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. The present study aimed to investigate response inhibition and interference control abilities of adults with ADHD.

Methods: The study included 42 adults diagnosed with ADHD and 43 healthy controls. The stop-signal task (SST) and Stroop test were used for assessing the response inhibition and interference control, respectively. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used for comparing the ADHD and healthy control groups in terms of their SST and Stroop test scores, wherein the age and education level of the participants were taken as covariables. The relationship between SST and Stroop Test and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) was tested by Pearson correlation analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparing the test scores between those who were administered with psychostimulants among the adults with ADHD and those who were not.

Results: Response inhibition was observed to be impaired in adults with ADHD compared with the healthy controls, whereas no difference regarding interference control was observed. As per the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), a weak and moderately negative relationship was found between the stop signal delay and the attentional, motor, non-planning scores, and total scores and a weak positive relationship was found between the stop-signal reaction time and the attentional, motor, non-planning scores, and total scores. A significant improvement was observed in the response inhibition skills of the adults with ADHD who had received methylphenidate treatment compared to those who had not, and the former also showed lower impulsivity levels as measured by the BIS-11.

Conclusions: It should be noted that response inhibition and interference control, which are considered under the umbrella of inhibitory control, may exhibit different characteristics in adult individuals diagnosed with ADHD and this is important for differential diagnosis. An improvement was observed in the response inhibition of adults with ADHD caused by psychostimulant treatment, which was associated with positive outcomes that were also noticeable by the patients. Understanding the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of the condition would further facilitate the development of appropriate treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人注意缺陷多动障碍的反应抑制与干扰控制。
在注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的执行功能中,抑制控制是主要的功能障碍领域之一,其特征包括反应抑制和干扰控制。确定受损的抑制控制成分将有助于ADHD的鉴别诊断和治疗。本研究旨在探讨成人ADHD患者的反应抑制和干扰控制能力。方法:该研究包括42名诊断为ADHD的成年人和43名健康对照者。采用停止信号任务(stop-signal task, SST)和Stroop测试分别评估反应抑制和干扰控制。ADHD组与健康对照组的SST和Stroop测试成绩采用多变量协方差分析,其中以被试的年龄和受教育程度为协变量。采用Pearson相关分析检验SST与Stroop测验和Barratt冲动性量表-11 (BIS-11)的关系。曼-惠特尼U检验用于比较患有多动症的成年人中服用精神兴奋剂和未服用精神兴奋剂的人的测试成绩。结果:与健康对照组相比,ADHD成人的反应抑制功能受损,而干扰控制功能无差异。根据Barratt冲动性量表(BIS-11),停止信号反应时间与注意、运动、非计划得分和总分呈弱和中度负相关,而停止信号反应时间与注意、运动、非计划得分和总分呈弱正相关。与未接受哌甲酯治疗的成人ADHD患者相比,接受哌甲酯治疗的成人ADHD患者在反应抑制技能方面有显著改善,而且根据BIS-11的测量,前者的冲动水平也较低。结论:应注意的是,作为抑制控制范畴的反应抑制和干扰控制在成年ADHD患者中可能表现出不同的特征,这对鉴别诊断具有重要意义。在精神兴奋剂治疗引起的成人ADHD反应抑制方面观察到改善,这与患者也注意到的积极结果相关。了解这种情况的潜在神经生理机制将进一步促进适当治疗的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Neuropsychiatry (Arch Neuropsychiatry) is the official journal of the Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society. It is published quarterly, and four editions annually constitute a volume. Archives of Neuropsychiatry is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles on psychiatry, neurology, and behavioural sciences. Both clinical and basic science contributions are welcomed. Submissions that address topics in the interface of neurology and psychiatry are encouraged. The content covers original research articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Are the Symptom Dimensions in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Related to Thought-Action Fusion, Magical Thinking, and Schizotypal Personality Traits? Evaluation of the Correlation Between Peripheral Inflammatory Markers and Suicide Risk in Drug-Naive First-Episode Schizophrenia. Gene Expression Levels Related to Histone Acetylation are Altered in Parkinson Disease Patients. Evaluation of Clinical Effects of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccines on Myasthenia Gravis. Comparing Serum AMH, InhB, Testosterone Levels and Finger Length Ratio (2D/4D) of Male Children with Specific Learning Disorder and Controls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1