Migraine Disability and Severity Improvement during Long-Term Treatment with Erenumab.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Neurology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000527674
Marco Bolchini, Francesca Schiano di Cola, Giulia Ceccardi, Salvatore Caratozzolo, Paolo Liberini, Renata Rao, Alessandro Padovani
{"title":"Migraine Disability and Severity Improvement during Long-Term Treatment with Erenumab.","authors":"Marco Bolchini,&nbsp;Francesca Schiano di Cola,&nbsp;Giulia Ceccardi,&nbsp;Salvatore Caratozzolo,&nbsp;Paolo Liberini,&nbsp;Renata Rao,&nbsp;Alessandro Padovani","doi":"10.1159/000527674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to assess erenumab efficacy in migraine disability and intensity throughout the first treatment cycle, discontinuation, and the first 6 months of re-treatment in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine. The study design was retrospective and observational. Inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis of high-frequency episodic migraine and ongoing treatment with erenumab 140 mg currently at their second treatment cycle. Data regarding migraine frequency, disability (MIDAS score), and severity of attacks (NRS score) were collected quarterly. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. At the end of the first treatment cycle, compared to baseline, a significant improvement of MIDAS scores was found (13.5 ± 11.1 vs. 72.5 ± 32.1; p = 0.005), with a subsequent worsening during treatment suspension (30.1 ± 26.9; p = 0.03). Pain intensity remained unmodified during the first treatment cycle (NRS score baseline: 7.6 ± 0.9 vs. 12 months: 7.5 ± 0.7; p = 0.13). During re-treatment, MIDAS scores documented a new significant improvement, reaching the same level at 6 months of re-treatment as at the end of the first cycle (30.1 ± 26.9 vs. 12.9 ± 5.4; p = 0.03). A significant improvement, compared to baseline, was observed for pain intensity during re-treatment (6.8 ± 2.2 vs. 5.6 ± 0.9 at RT3 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 at RT6; p = 0.05). In conclusion, during re-treatment with erenumab 140 mg, migraine pain intensity and disability documented a significant and progressive improvement. Our data confirm the long-term efficacy, although in a very limited case series, of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP beyond headache frequency reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":"86 2","pages":"135-139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess erenumab efficacy in migraine disability and intensity throughout the first treatment cycle, discontinuation, and the first 6 months of re-treatment in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine. The study design was retrospective and observational. Inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis of high-frequency episodic migraine and ongoing treatment with erenumab 140 mg currently at their second treatment cycle. Data regarding migraine frequency, disability (MIDAS score), and severity of attacks (NRS score) were collected quarterly. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. At the end of the first treatment cycle, compared to baseline, a significant improvement of MIDAS scores was found (13.5 ± 11.1 vs. 72.5 ± 32.1; p = 0.005), with a subsequent worsening during treatment suspension (30.1 ± 26.9; p = 0.03). Pain intensity remained unmodified during the first treatment cycle (NRS score baseline: 7.6 ± 0.9 vs. 12 months: 7.5 ± 0.7; p = 0.13). During re-treatment, MIDAS scores documented a new significant improvement, reaching the same level at 6 months of re-treatment as at the end of the first cycle (30.1 ± 26.9 vs. 12.9 ± 5.4; p = 0.03). A significant improvement, compared to baseline, was observed for pain intensity during re-treatment (6.8 ± 2.2 vs. 5.6 ± 0.9 at RT3 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 at RT6; p = 0.05). In conclusion, during re-treatment with erenumab 140 mg, migraine pain intensity and disability documented a significant and progressive improvement. Our data confirm the long-term efficacy, although in a very limited case series, of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP beyond headache frequency reduction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期使用伊瑞那单抗治疗偏头痛的残疾和严重程度的改善。
本研究的目的是评估伊瑞那单抗在高频发作性偏头痛患者第一个治疗周期、停药和重新治疗的前6个月期间对偏头痛残疾和强度的疗效。本研究设计为回顾性观察性研究。纳入标准如下:诊断为高频发作性偏头痛,并正在进行伊瑞那单抗140 mg的治疗,目前处于第二个治疗周期。每季度收集有关偏头痛频率、残疾(MIDAS评分)和发作严重程度(NRS评分)的数据。25名患者入组。在第一个治疗周期结束时,与基线相比,MIDAS评分显著改善(13.5±11.1 vs. 72.5±32.1;P = 0.005),治疗暂停期间病情加重(30.1±26.9;P = 0.03)。疼痛强度在第一个治疗周期保持不变(NRS评分基线:7.6±0.9 vs. 12个月:7.5±0.7;P = 0.13)。在再次治疗期间,MIDAS评分记录了新的显著改善,在再次治疗6个月时与第一个周期结束时达到相同的水平(30.1±26.9 vs 12.9±5.4;P = 0.03)。与基线相比,再次治疗期间疼痛强度有显著改善(RT3为6.8±2.2 vs. 5.6±0.9 vs. RT6为5.2±1.4;P = 0.05)。总之,在伊瑞那单抗140mg再次治疗期间,偏头痛疼痛强度和残疾有了显著的进行性改善。我们的数据证实,尽管在非常有限的病例系列中,靶向CGRP的单克隆抗体的长期疗效超过了头痛频率的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
期刊最新文献
SEX DIFFERENCES IN MARKERS OF CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH LOBAR INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE. Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Evolution in the Times of the Pandemic and Multimedia. Causal Associations Between Tea Consumption and REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Continuous versus Routine Electroencephalography in the Intensive Care Unit: A Review of Current Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1