Decrease of peripheral blood lymphocyte count predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Ok Hee Lee, Sun-Young Min
{"title":"Decrease of peripheral blood lymphocyte count predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.","authors":"Ok Hee Lee,&nbsp;Sun-Young Min","doi":"10.14216/kjco.20013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) holds promise as a significant prognostic factor to predict NAC response in breast cancer patients. The absolute peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) count has been suggested as an independent predictor of response to NAC. The current study evaluated the relationship between pCR and the change of PBL count in patients treated with NAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 61 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer treated with NAC followed by mastectomy between January 2010 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Correlational analyses confirmed a statistically significant relationship between PBL count and pCR. Following conformational correlational analyses, patients were divided into two groups according to cutoff values using the receiver operating characteristics curve and a logistic regression was conducted to determine the optimal conditions for achieving pCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (22.9%) achieved pCR. Most PBL counts decreased after NAC relevant to pCR. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a small decrease of PBL was associated with pCR (P=0.028). The cutoff value of PBL decrease was 755×10<sup>6</sup>/L, which was used to divide patients into high and low reduction groups. The pCR rate was 11.43% and 38.46% for the high and low reduction group, respectively (area under the curve, 0.707; 95% confidence interval, 0.556-0.858; P=0.020). The high reduction group was found to have more difficulty achieving pCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decrease of PBL is significantly associated with pCR. Our data support that the decrease of PBL after NAC may be useful factors in predicting the response to NAC in breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74045,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/32/kjco-16-2-79.PMC9942727.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.20013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) holds promise as a significant prognostic factor to predict NAC response in breast cancer patients. The absolute peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) count has been suggested as an independent predictor of response to NAC. The current study evaluated the relationship between pCR and the change of PBL count in patients treated with NAC.

Methods: A total of 61 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer treated with NAC followed by mastectomy between January 2010 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Correlational analyses confirmed a statistically significant relationship between PBL count and pCR. Following conformational correlational analyses, patients were divided into two groups according to cutoff values using the receiver operating characteristics curve and a logistic regression was conducted to determine the optimal conditions for achieving pCR.

Results: A total of 14 patients (22.9%) achieved pCR. Most PBL counts decreased after NAC relevant to pCR. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a small decrease of PBL was associated with pCR (P=0.028). The cutoff value of PBL decrease was 755×106/L, which was used to divide patients into high and low reduction groups. The pCR rate was 11.43% and 38.46% for the high and low reduction group, respectively (area under the curve, 0.707; 95% confidence interval, 0.556-0.858; P=0.020). The high reduction group was found to have more difficulty achieving pCR.

Conclusion: The decrease of PBL is significantly associated with pCR. Our data support that the decrease of PBL after NAC may be useful factors in predicting the response to NAC in breast cancer patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周血淋巴细胞计数减少预测乳腺癌患者对新辅助化疗的反应。
目的:新辅助化疗(NAC)后病理完全反应(pCR)有望作为预测乳腺癌患者NAC反应的重要预后因素。绝对外周血淋巴细胞(PBL)计数已被认为是NAC反应的独立预测因子。本研究评估了pCR与NAC治疗患者PBL计数变化之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2019年12月61例经组织学证实的乳腺癌经NAC治疗后乳房切除术的患者。相关分析证实PBL计数与pCR之间存在显著的统计学关系。在进行构象相关分析后,根据受试者工作特征曲线的截断值将患者分为两组,并进行逻辑回归以确定实现pCR的最佳条件。结果:共14例(22.9%)患者pCR成功。与pCR相关的NAC后,大多数PBL计数下降。Logistic回归分析显示PBL的小幅下降与pCR相关(P=0.028)。PBL降低的临界值为755×106/L,用于将患者分为高、低降低组。高还原组和低还原组的pCR率分别为11.43%和38.46%(曲线下面积0.707;95%置信区间为0.556-0.858;P = 0.020)。发现高还原组更难以实现pCR。结论:PBL的降低与pCR有显著相关性。我们的数据支持NAC后PBL的下降可能是预测乳腺癌患者对NAC反应的有用因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of tumor budding and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with clinicopathological parameters in gallbladder carcinoma. Clinical course of pancreas cancer diagnosed after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with borderline lesion: two case reports. Measurement of human peritoneal surface area using artificial intelligence software in abdominal computed tomography. Pancreatoduodenectomy with colon-last approach for advanced pancreatic head cancer. Prediction of the minimum amount of anti-adhesive agent required for entire intra-abdominal cavity using fluorescent dye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1