Towards a sociology of curiosity: theoretical and empirical consideration of the epistemic drive notion.

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Theory and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s11186-021-09464-y
Ariel Bineth
{"title":"Towards a sociology of curiosity: theoretical and empirical consideration of the epistemic drive notion.","authors":"Ariel Bineth","doi":"10.1007/s11186-021-09464-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article argues for the social production of curiosity. Due its motivating characteristic, curiosity is reconceptualized as an <i>epistemic drive</i> which organizes the social production of knowledge under given socio-historical and local-cultural circumstances. First, historical, philosophical, and sociological literature is reviewed to give a context for the argument. Then a theoretical apparatus is developed considering the emergence, development, and impact of epistemic drives which serves as a foundation for empirical analysis. The second part demonstrates applicability by discussing the problem of economic incentives in scientific research. I argue that scientific projects with little to none immediate economic return have a significant disadvantage in acquiring funding which in turn impacts the mobilization of curiosity in their field. A tendency which systematically yields a disproportionate distribution of knowledge. In conclusion, the article suggests the usefulness of the epistemic drive notion in understanding curiosity as a sociological object.</p>","PeriodicalId":48137,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Society","volume":"52 1","pages":"119-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09464-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues for the social production of curiosity. Due its motivating characteristic, curiosity is reconceptualized as an epistemic drive which organizes the social production of knowledge under given socio-historical and local-cultural circumstances. First, historical, philosophical, and sociological literature is reviewed to give a context for the argument. Then a theoretical apparatus is developed considering the emergence, development, and impact of epistemic drives which serves as a foundation for empirical analysis. The second part demonstrates applicability by discussing the problem of economic incentives in scientific research. I argue that scientific projects with little to none immediate economic return have a significant disadvantage in acquiring funding which in turn impacts the mobilization of curiosity in their field. A tendency which systematically yields a disproportionate distribution of knowledge. In conclusion, the article suggests the usefulness of the epistemic drive notion in understanding curiosity as a sociological object.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向好奇心社会学:对认识论驱动力概念的理论和实证思考。
文章论证了好奇心的社会生产。由于好奇心的动机特征,它被重新概念化为一种认识论驱动力,在特定的社会历史和地方文化环境下组织知识的社会生产。首先,我们回顾了历史、哲学和社会学文献,为论证提供了背景。然后,考虑到认识论驱动力的出现、发展和影响,建立了一个理论装置,作为实证分析的基础。第二部分通过讨论科学研究中的经济激励问题来证明其适用性。我认为,几乎没有直接经济回报的科学项目在获取资金方面会有很大的劣势,这反过来又会影响其领域内好奇心的调动。这种趋势系统性地导致了知识的不成比例分配。最后,文章提出了认识论驱动力概念在理解作为社会学对象的好奇心方面的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Society
Theory and Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Theory and Society is a forum for the international community of scholars that publishes theoretically-informed analyses of social processes. It opens its pages to authors working at the frontiers of social analysis, regardless of discipline. Its subject matter ranges from prehistory to contemporary affairs, from treatments of single individuals and national societies to world culture, from discussions of theory to methodological critique, from First World to Third World - but always in the effort to bring together theory, criticism and concrete observation.
期刊最新文献
Dating in captivity: creativity, digital affordance, and the organization of interaction in online dating during quarantine The theory and function of Marxian water rent in the United States Correction to: Reimagining modern politics in the European mountains: confronting the traditional commons with the neo‑rural conception of the common good What counts as investment? Productive and unproductive expenditures The gates to the profession are open: the alternative institutionalization of data science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1