Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty

F. Grados , C. Depriester , G. Cayrolle , N. Hardy , H. Deramond , P. Fardellone
{"title":"Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty","authors":"F. Grados ,&nbsp;C. Depriester ,&nbsp;G. Cayrolle ,&nbsp;N. Hardy ,&nbsp;H. Deramond ,&nbsp;P. Fardellone","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the immediate and long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for the treatment of refractory pain resulting from osteoporotic vertebral fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective, open study of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) was conducted with long-term follow-up. PV with PMMA was carried out between 1990 and 1996 in 40 patients with symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s) that had not responded to maximum medical therapy. In 1997, each patient was asked to come back to our institution for a physical and spinal X-ray examination. Efficacy was assessed by changes over time in pain on Huskisson's visual analogue scale (VAS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four vertebrae treated by PV in 25 patients were evaluated with long-term follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 48 months (range 12–84 months). Pain assessed by the VAS significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) decreased from a mean of 80 mm ± 16 (S.D.) before PV to 37 ± 24 mm after 1 month and 34 ± 28 mm at the time of maximal follow-up. There was no severe complication related to this treatment, and no progression of vertebral deformity in any of the injected vertebrae. However, there was a slight but significantly increased risk of vertebral fracture in the vicinity of a cemented vertebra (odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.1–4.56).The odds ratio of a vertebral fracture in the vicinity of an uncemented fractured vertebra was 1.44 (0.82–2.55).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PV appears to be a safe and useful procedure for the treatment of focal back pain secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fracture when conservative treatment has failed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 118-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.004","citationCount":"354","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193598100900005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 354

Abstract

Objective

To assess the immediate and long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for the treatment of refractory pain resulting from osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods

A retrospective, open study of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) was conducted with long-term follow-up. PV with PMMA was carried out between 1990 and 1996 in 40 patients with symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s) that had not responded to maximum medical therapy. In 1997, each patient was asked to come back to our institution for a physical and spinal X-ray examination. Efficacy was assessed by changes over time in pain on Huskisson's visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

Thirty-four vertebrae treated by PV in 25 patients were evaluated with long-term follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 48 months (range 12–84 months). Pain assessed by the VAS significantly (P < 0.05) decreased from a mean of 80 mm ± 16 (S.D.) before PV to 37 ± 24 mm after 1 month and 34 ± 28 mm at the time of maximal follow-up. There was no severe complication related to this treatment, and no progression of vertebral deformity in any of the injected vertebrae. However, there was a slight but significantly increased risk of vertebral fracture in the vicinity of a cemented vertebra (odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.1–4.56).The odds ratio of a vertebral fracture in the vicinity of an uncemented fractured vertebra was 1.44 (0.82–2.55).

Conclusion

PV appears to be a safe and useful procedure for the treatment of focal back pain secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fracture when conservative treatment has failed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮椎体成形术治疗椎体骨质疏松性骨折的长期观察
目的评价聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折难治性疼痛的近期和远期疗效及安全性。方法对经皮椎体成形术(PV)进行回顾性、开放性研究,并进行长期随访。在1990年至1996年间,对40例有症状的骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者进行了PMMA联合PV,这些患者对最大限度的药物治疗没有反应。1997年,每个病人都被要求回到我们的机构进行身体和脊柱x光检查。通过疼痛随时间的变化在Huskisson视觉模拟量表(VAS)上进行评估。结果对25例经PV治疗的34个椎体进行了长期随访。平均随访时间为48个月(12-84个月)。VAS评估疼痛显著(P <0.05)从PV前的平均80 mm±16 (S.D.)下降到1个月后的37±24 mm和最大随访时的34±28 mm。该治疗无严重并发症,注射椎体无椎体畸形进展。然而,骨水泥椎体附近椎体骨折的风险轻微但显著增加(优势比2.27,95%可信区间1.1-4.56)。未骨水泥骨折椎体附近椎体骨折的优势比为1.44(0.82-2.55)。结论在保守治疗失败的情况下,pv是一种安全有效的治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折继发局灶性背痛的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1