Comparison of the coherence-transfer efficiencies of laboratory- and rotating-frame experiments

A Ramamoorthy, N Chandrakumar
{"title":"Comparison of the coherence-transfer efficiencies of laboratory- and rotating-frame experiments","authors":"A Ramamoorthy,&nbsp;N Chandrakumar","doi":"10.1016/0022-2364(92)90365-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coherence transfer under INEPT and isotropic mixing is quantified theoretically and the predictions are verified by experiments on various homonuclear spin systems. A general expression for magnetization transfer is derived for INEPT in A<sub><em>M</em></sub>X<sub><em>N</em></sub> systems, in terms of the “leaving fraction,” trigonometric function, “spin multiplier,” and “attenuation factor.” In general, coherence transfer under INEPT is not identical from A<sub><em>M</em></sub> to X<sub><em>N</em></sub> and X<sub><em>N</em></sub> to A<sub><em>M</em></sub> when <em>M</em> ≠ <em>N</em>. Unlike INEPT, in the case of isotropic mixing all magnetization components are conserved for the spin system as a whole, transfer is in-phase, and the <em>m</em> = 0 component of spin multiplets also plays a role in coherence transfer, leading to advantages over INEPT under conditions of unresolved couplings and integer composite angular momenta. Coherence-transfer efficiencies of these experiments are compared with the predicted universal bound on spin dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)","volume":"100 1","pages":"Pages 60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0022-2364(92)90365-E","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002223649290365E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Coherence transfer under INEPT and isotropic mixing is quantified theoretically and the predictions are verified by experiments on various homonuclear spin systems. A general expression for magnetization transfer is derived for INEPT in AMXN systems, in terms of the “leaving fraction,” trigonometric function, “spin multiplier,” and “attenuation factor.” In general, coherence transfer under INEPT is not identical from AM to XN and XN to AM when MN. Unlike INEPT, in the case of isotropic mixing all magnetization components are conserved for the spin system as a whole, transfer is in-phase, and the m = 0 component of spin multiplets also plays a role in coherence transfer, leading to advantages over INEPT under conditions of unresolved couplings and integer composite angular momenta. Coherence-transfer efficiencies of these experiments are compared with the predicted universal bound on spin dynamics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验室与旋转框架实验的相干传递效率比较
从理论上量化了INEPT和各向同性混合作用下的相干转移,并通过不同同核自旋系统的实验验证了预测。根据“剩余分数”、三角函数、“自旋倍增器”和“衰减因子”,导出了AMXN系统中INEPT磁化传递的一般表达式。一般来说,当M≠n时,在INEPT下,AM到XN和XN到AM的相干转移并不完全相同,与INEPT不同的是,在各向同性混合情况下,自旋系统的所有磁化分量作为一个整体都是守恒的,传递是同相的,并且自旋多重态的M = 0分量也在相干转移中起作用,这使得INEPT在耦合未解析和整数复合角动量条件下优于INEPT。这些实验的相干转移效率与预测的自旋动力学通用界进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast-scan magnetic resonance, principles and applications Can transverse coherence be eliminated in a FLASH imaging sequence without varying the phase of the rf pulse? without varying the phase of the RF pulse? Indirect imaging: 14N imaged with 1H {14N} double resonance Improved experiments for the assignment of crowded peptide spectra Suppression of artifacts in phase-sensitive COSY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1