Impact of global government investment on education and research development: A comparative analysis and demystifying the science, technology, innovation, and education conundrum

Q1 Social Sciences Global Transitions Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.glt.2022.10.001
Kingsley Okoye , Julius T. Nganji , Jose Escamilla , Jin Michael Fung , Samira Hosseini
{"title":"Impact of global government investment on education and research development: A comparative analysis and demystifying the science, technology, innovation, and education conundrum","authors":"Kingsley Okoye ,&nbsp;Julius T. Nganji ,&nbsp;Jose Escamilla ,&nbsp;Jin Michael Fung ,&nbsp;Samira Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To secure an inclusive and development-oriented society where nations can create, access, and utilize a scalable and sustainable infrastructure and resources, an equitable and effective investment in education and human capital development, including science, technology, and innovation (STI) has proven to be inevitable. There have been speculations on how disproportionate the global government investments and expenditures may be in achieving those goals across the regions. This study conducts a comparative analysis of data about global government investment in relation to education, STI and researchers/human capital development. We applied a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and multiple comparisons (Post Hoc Tukey) tests to determine the association between the different types of regions and the level of Educational and STI investment as per percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) and full-time equivalent (FTE) of researchers between 2015 and 2020, respectively. Three categories of data from The UNESCO's Institute for Statistics (UIS) on sustainable development goals (SDGs) were used for the investigations. The analyzed dataset consisted of information about Education as per GDP (<em>n</em> = 190), STI as per GDP (<em>n</em> = 155), and STI as per Researcher FTE (<em>n</em> = 155). The results show that there were differences in the global government investments in the above constructs between the low- and middle-income vs high-income regions. In turn, the study empirically discussed and shed light on the leading factors by considering their implications, and how those can be used to support decision-making and infrastructural investment policies by the various governments, policymakers, financial investors, and educators towards a global/sustainable practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258979182200010X/pdfft?md5=f1bda187b0d70702cc605b49c978e11d&pid=1-s2.0-S258979182200010X-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258979182200010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To secure an inclusive and development-oriented society where nations can create, access, and utilize a scalable and sustainable infrastructure and resources, an equitable and effective investment in education and human capital development, including science, technology, and innovation (STI) has proven to be inevitable. There have been speculations on how disproportionate the global government investments and expenditures may be in achieving those goals across the regions. This study conducts a comparative analysis of data about global government investment in relation to education, STI and researchers/human capital development. We applied a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and multiple comparisons (Post Hoc Tukey) tests to determine the association between the different types of regions and the level of Educational and STI investment as per percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) and full-time equivalent (FTE) of researchers between 2015 and 2020, respectively. Three categories of data from The UNESCO's Institute for Statistics (UIS) on sustainable development goals (SDGs) were used for the investigations. The analyzed dataset consisted of information about Education as per GDP (n = 190), STI as per GDP (n = 155), and STI as per Researcher FTE (n = 155). The results show that there were differences in the global government investments in the above constructs between the low- and middle-income vs high-income regions. In turn, the study empirically discussed and shed light on the leading factors by considering their implications, and how those can be used to support decision-making and infrastructural investment policies by the various governments, policymakers, financial investors, and educators towards a global/sustainable practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球政府投资对教育和研究发展的影响:科学、技术、创新和教育难题的比较分析与揭秘
事实证明,为了确保各国能够创建、获取和利用可扩展和可持续的基础设施和资源的包容性和发展导向型社会,在教育和人力资本开发(包括科学、技术和创新)方面进行公平和有效的投资是不可避免的。有人猜测,在实现这些目标方面,全球政府的投资和支出可能是多么不成比例。本研究对全球政府在教育、科技创新和研究人员/人力资本开发方面的投资数据进行了比较分析。我们应用多元方差分析(MANOVA)和多重比较(Post Hoc Tukey)检验来确定2015年至2020年间不同类型地区与教育和科技投资水平(占国内生产总值(GDP)和研究人员全职当量(FTE)的百分比)之间的关系。联合国教科文组织统计研究所(UIS)关于可持续发展目标(SDGs)的三类数据被用于调查。所分析的数据集包括教育占GDP的比例(n = 190)、科技与创新占GDP的比例(n = 155)和科技与创新占研究者FTE的比例(n = 155)。结果表明,中低收入地区与高收入地区在上述结构上的全球政府投资存在差异。反过来,该研究通过考虑其影响,以及如何利用这些因素来支持各国政府、政策制定者、金融投资者和教育工作者的决策和基础设施投资政策,从而实现全球/可持续实践,从而对主要因素进行了实证讨论和阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reduction in inpatient and severe condition visits for respiratory diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China Cancer as a global health crisis with deep evolutionary roots Exploring the nexus: Comparing and aligning Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic exposure on current and future worldwide environmental protection across 18 nations in 6 continents The role of physical function and physical activity on cognitive function in the elderly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1