Bibliometric analysis and system review of vehicle routing optimization for emergency material distribution

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtte.2022.10.001
Jinxing Shen , Kun Liu , Changxi Ma , Yongpeng Zhao , Chuwei Shi
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis and system review of vehicle routing optimization for emergency material distribution","authors":"Jinxing Shen ,&nbsp;Kun Liu ,&nbsp;Changxi Ma ,&nbsp;Yongpeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Chuwei Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining the optimal vehicle routing of emergency material distribution (VREMD) is one of the core issues of emergency management, which is strategically important to improve the effectiveness of emergency response and thus reduce the negative impact of large-scale emergency events. To summarize the latest research progress, we collected 511 VREMD-related articles published from 2010 to the present from the Scopus database and conducted a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software. Subsequently, we cautiously selected 49 articles from these publications for system review; sorted out the latest research progress in model construction and solution algorithms; and summarized the evolution trend of keywords, research gaps, and future works. The results show that domestic scholars and research organizations held an unqualified advantage regarding the number of published papers. However, these organizations with the most publications performed poorly regarding the number of literature citations. China and the US have contributed the vast majority of the literature, and there are close collaborations between researchers from both countries. The optimization model of VREMD can be divided into single-, multi-, and joint-objective models. The shortest travel time is the most common optimization objective in the single-objective optimization model. Several scholars focus on multiobjective optimization models to consider conflicting objectives simultaneously. In recent literature, scholars have focused on the impact of uncertainty and special events (e.g., COVID-19) on VREMD. Moreover, some scholars focus on joint optimization models to optimize vehicle routes and central locations (or material allocation) simultaneously. Solution algorithms can be divided into two primary categories, i.e., mathematical planning methods and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. The branch and bound algorithm is the most dominant mathematical planning algorithm, while genetic algorithms and their enhancements are the most commonly used intelligent evolutionary algorithms. It is shown that the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) can effectively solve the multiobjective model of VREMD. To further improve the algorithm's performance, researchers have proposed improved hybrid intelligent algorithms that combine the advantages of NSGA-II and certain other algorithms. Scholars have also proposed a series of optimization algorithms for specific scenarios. With the development of new technologies and computation methods, it will be exciting to construct optimization models that consider uncertainty, heterogeneity, and temporality for large-scale real-world issues and develop generalized solution approaches rather than those applicable to specific scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756422001015/pdfft?md5=1d97ec60af122aee152a7c5fcd5b6453&pid=1-s2.0-S2095756422001015-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756422001015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Determining the optimal vehicle routing of emergency material distribution (VREMD) is one of the core issues of emergency management, which is strategically important to improve the effectiveness of emergency response and thus reduce the negative impact of large-scale emergency events. To summarize the latest research progress, we collected 511 VREMD-related articles published from 2010 to the present from the Scopus database and conducted a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software. Subsequently, we cautiously selected 49 articles from these publications for system review; sorted out the latest research progress in model construction and solution algorithms; and summarized the evolution trend of keywords, research gaps, and future works. The results show that domestic scholars and research organizations held an unqualified advantage regarding the number of published papers. However, these organizations with the most publications performed poorly regarding the number of literature citations. China and the US have contributed the vast majority of the literature, and there are close collaborations between researchers from both countries. The optimization model of VREMD can be divided into single-, multi-, and joint-objective models. The shortest travel time is the most common optimization objective in the single-objective optimization model. Several scholars focus on multiobjective optimization models to consider conflicting objectives simultaneously. In recent literature, scholars have focused on the impact of uncertainty and special events (e.g., COVID-19) on VREMD. Moreover, some scholars focus on joint optimization models to optimize vehicle routes and central locations (or material allocation) simultaneously. Solution algorithms can be divided into two primary categories, i.e., mathematical planning methods and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. The branch and bound algorithm is the most dominant mathematical planning algorithm, while genetic algorithms and their enhancements are the most commonly used intelligent evolutionary algorithms. It is shown that the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) can effectively solve the multiobjective model of VREMD. To further improve the algorithm's performance, researchers have proposed improved hybrid intelligent algorithms that combine the advantages of NSGA-II and certain other algorithms. Scholars have also proposed a series of optimization algorithms for specific scenarios. With the development of new technologies and computation methods, it will be exciting to construct optimization models that consider uncertainty, heterogeneity, and temporality for large-scale real-world issues and develop generalized solution approaches rather than those applicable to specific scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应急物资配送车辆路径优化的文献计量分析与系统综述
确定最优应急物资配送车辆路径是应急管理的核心问题之一,对于提高应急响应效率,减少大型应急事件的负面影响具有重要的战略意义。为了总结最新的研究进展,我们从Scopus数据库中收集了2010年至今发表的511篇与vremd相关的文章,并利用VOSviewer软件进行了文献计量学分析。随后,我们从这些出版物中谨慎地选择了49篇文章进行系统评审;梳理了模型构建和求解算法的最新研究进展;并总结了关键词的演变趋势、研究空白和未来工作。结果表明,国内学者和研究机构在论文发表数量上占有绝对优势。然而,这些拥有最多出版物的组织在文献引用数量方面表现不佳。中国和美国贡献了绝大多数文献,两国研究人员之间也有密切的合作。VREMD优化模型可分为单目标、多目标和联合目标三种。最短行程时间是单目标优化模型中最常见的优化目标。一些学者关注多目标优化模型,以同时考虑冲突的目标。在最近的文献中,学者们主要关注不确定性和特殊事件(如COVID-19)对VREMD的影响。此外,一些学者关注联合优化模型,以同时优化车辆路线和中心位置(或物资分配)。求解算法可以分为两大类,即数学规划方法和智能进化算法。分支定界算法是最主流的数学规划算法,而遗传算法及其增强算法是最常用的智能进化算法。结果表明,非支配排序遗传算法II (NSGA-II)能够有效地求解多目标VREMD模型。为了进一步提高算法的性能,研究人员提出了改进的混合智能算法,该算法结合了NSGA-II和某些其他算法的优点。学者们也针对具体场景提出了一系列优化算法。随着新技术和计算方法的发展,构建考虑大规模现实问题的不确定性、异质性和暂时性的优化模型,并开发通用的解决方法,而不是适用于特定场景的方法,将是令人兴奋的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Potential applications for composite utilization of rubber and plastic in asphalt pavements: A critical review Design equations for maximum stress concentration factors for concrete-filled steel tubular K-joints A systematic review of digital twins for electric vehicles Architecture, application, and prospect of digital twin for highway infrastructure Assessing the risk of pedestrian crossing behavior on suburban roads using structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1