Lung volume reduction surgery and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in severe emphysema

A. James Mamary, Gerard J. Criner
{"title":"Lung volume reduction surgery and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in severe emphysema","authors":"A. James Mamary,&nbsp;Gerard J. Criner","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lung volume reduction surgery<span><span><span> (LVRS) improves the fit of severely hyperinflated emphysematous lungs to the surrounding chest cavity<span> and thereby improves respiratory mechanics and expiratory airflow. LVRS is a potent and life extending therapy for some patients with severe emphysema<span><span> and has a low associated operative mortality. The national emphysema </span>treatment trial (NETT) identified characteristics of patients for whom LVRS improves survival, function and health-related </span></span></span>quality of life and characteristics of patients who should not have surgery. Patients with upper-lobe predominant distribution of emphysema on high-resolution computed tomogram are most likely to benefit from LVRS vs. optimal medical therapy and rehabilitation. At long-term follow-up, the survival and functional benefits derived from LVRS are durable. In efforts to make lung volume reduction safer and more broadly accessible physician-scientists have developed bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedures. Early </span>clinical trials<span><span> of BLVR performed with endobronchial valves<span> (EVB) and sclerosant biogels demonstrate their safety. The ability of BLVR EBV techniques to produce desired </span></span>atelectasis and lung volume loss is likely limited in those patients with collateral ventilation, incomplete fissures and those unable to achieve complete lobar exclusion. Results from a phase III BLVR EBV trial are in analysis.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.010","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174504540800018X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves the fit of severely hyperinflated emphysematous lungs to the surrounding chest cavity and thereby improves respiratory mechanics and expiratory airflow. LVRS is a potent and life extending therapy for some patients with severe emphysema and has a low associated operative mortality. The national emphysema treatment trial (NETT) identified characteristics of patients for whom LVRS improves survival, function and health-related quality of life and characteristics of patients who should not have surgery. Patients with upper-lobe predominant distribution of emphysema on high-resolution computed tomogram are most likely to benefit from LVRS vs. optimal medical therapy and rehabilitation. At long-term follow-up, the survival and functional benefits derived from LVRS are durable. In efforts to make lung volume reduction safer and more broadly accessible physician-scientists have developed bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedures. Early clinical trials of BLVR performed with endobronchial valves (EVB) and sclerosant biogels demonstrate their safety. The ability of BLVR EBV techniques to produce desired atelectasis and lung volume loss is likely limited in those patients with collateral ventilation, incomplete fissures and those unable to achieve complete lobar exclusion. Results from a phase III BLVR EBV trial are in analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺减容手术和支气管镜下肺减容治疗严重肺气肿
肺减容手术(LVRS)改善严重过度充气的肺气肿肺与周围胸腔的配合,从而改善呼吸力学和呼气气流。对于一些严重肺气肿患者,LVRS是一种有效的延长生命的治疗方法,并且具有较低的相关手术死亡率。国家肺气肿治疗试验(NETT)确定了LVRS可改善患者生存、功能和健康相关生活质量的患者特征,以及不应进行手术的患者特征。在高分辨率计算机断层扫描上,肺气肿上叶主要分布的患者最有可能从LVRS中获益,而不是最佳的药物治疗和康复。在长期随访中,LVRS获得的生存和功能益处是持久的。为了使肺减容术更安全、更容易获得,医生和科学家们开发了支气管镜肺减容术(BLVR)。支气管内瓣膜(EVB)和硬化剂生物凝胶进行BLVR的早期临床试验证明了它们的安全性。BLVR - EBV技术产生预期肺不张和肺容量损失的能力可能在侧支通气、不完全性裂和无法实现完全肺叶排除的患者中受到限制。BLVR EBV III期试验的结果正在分析中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial ATS 2009 Conference Report Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction in COPD Investigating a potential role for macrolide therapy in COPD Comparison of new prognostic assessments in COPD patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1