Is a new diagnostic questionnaire useful for identifying patients with COPD?

{"title":"Is a new diagnostic questionnaire useful for identifying patients with COPD?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of the present study was to determine the external validity of a recently developed questionnaire for the identification of patients at increased risk of airflow limitation in smokers from the general population in the provinces of Dutch and Belgian Limburg (regions surrounding Maastricht, the Netherlands). As part of a study on the early detection of airflow limitation and subsequent smoking cessation treatment (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: 64481813), the recently developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnostic questionnaire was used in current smokers aged 40–70<!--> <!-->yrs, with a smoking history of &gt;or=10 pack-yrs, who reported one or more respiratory symptom (cough, sputum production or dyspnoea), but who had no diagnosis of a respiratory disease (COPD or asthma). Spirometry performed according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria served as a reference test. Of the 676 subjects who entered the analyses, 398 showed normal lung function and 278 had a diagnosis of COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity of &lt;0.70). The ability of the COPD diagnostic questionnaire to discriminate between subjects with and without COPD was poor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.65). In a high-risk population consisting of middle-aged current smokers with a smoking history of &gt;or=10 pack-yrs, the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnostic questionnaire is probably not useful as a diagnostic tool for the identification of patients with an increased risk of airflow limitation.<br></p><p>Reproduced with permission from European Respiratory Society Journals Ltd.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the external validity of a recently developed questionnaire for the identification of patients at increased risk of airflow limitation in smokers from the general population in the provinces of Dutch and Belgian Limburg (regions surrounding Maastricht, the Netherlands). As part of a study on the early detection of airflow limitation and subsequent smoking cessation treatment (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: 64481813), the recently developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnostic questionnaire was used in current smokers aged 40–70 yrs, with a smoking history of >or=10 pack-yrs, who reported one or more respiratory symptom (cough, sputum production or dyspnoea), but who had no diagnosis of a respiratory disease (COPD or asthma). Spirometry performed according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria served as a reference test. Of the 676 subjects who entered the analyses, 398 showed normal lung function and 278 had a diagnosis of COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity of <0.70). The ability of the COPD diagnostic questionnaire to discriminate between subjects with and without COPD was poor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.65). In a high-risk population consisting of middle-aged current smokers with a smoking history of >or=10 pack-yrs, the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnostic questionnaire is probably not useful as a diagnostic tool for the identification of patients with an increased risk of airflow limitation.

Reproduced with permission from European Respiratory Society Journals Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的诊断问卷对识别COPD患者有用吗?
本研究的目的是确定最近开发的一份问卷的外部有效性,该问卷用于识别荷兰和比利时林堡省(荷兰马斯特里赫特周边地区)普通人群中吸烟者气流受限风险增加的患者。作为气流限制早期检测和随后戒烟治疗研究的一部分(国际标准随机对照试验号:64481813),最近制定的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断问卷用于年龄在40-70岁、吸烟史为10包年、报告一种或多种呼吸道症状(咳嗽、咳痰或呼吸困难)但未诊断出呼吸道疾病(COPD或哮喘)的当前吸烟者。根据美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会标准进行肺量测定作为参考试验。在加入分析的676名受试者中,398名肺功能正常,278名诊断为COPD(支气管扩张剂后一秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量为0.70)。COPD诊断问卷区分COPD患者和非COPD患者的能力较差(受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.65)。在由吸烟史≥10包/年的中年吸烟者组成的高危人群中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断问卷可能无法作为识别气流受限风险增加患者的诊断工具。经欧洲呼吸学会期刊有限公司许可转载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial ATS 2009 Conference Report Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction in COPD Investigating a potential role for macrolide therapy in COPD Comparison of new prognostic assessments in COPD patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1