Effects of cognitive pain coping strategies and locus of control on perception of cold pressor pain in healthy individuals: Experimental study

Natasa Jokic-Begic , Dragutin Ivanec , Dragana Markanovic
{"title":"Effects of cognitive pain coping strategies and locus of control on perception of cold pressor pain in healthy individuals: Experimental study","authors":"Natasa Jokic-Begic ,&nbsp;Dragutin Ivanec ,&nbsp;Dragana Markanovic","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the coping strategies – distraction and redefining – on pain experience in individuals with internal vs. external locus of control.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The participants were exposed to pain induced by cold pressor procedure. Pain tolerance, pain intensity, and objective and subjective duration of pain were measured in three different situations. In the control situation, the participants did not use any cognitive pain coping strategy. In two other situations, they used distraction and redefining strategies, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Internally- and externally-oriented participants did not differ in pain tolerance, pain intensity ratings, and subjective duration of painful stimulation in any of the three situations. The use of cognitive pain coping strategies increased pain tolerance in both groups in comparison with the control situation. In both situations, the participants underestimated the duration of pain tolerance. There was no difference between the effectiveness of distraction and redefining strategies on pain tolerance and pain intensity ratings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cognitive pain coping strategies increase the duration of pain tolerance irrespective of the individual's locus of control, but have no effect on pain intensity rating.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366007109000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the coping strategies – distraction and redefining – on pain experience in individuals with internal vs. external locus of control.

Method

The participants were exposed to pain induced by cold pressor procedure. Pain tolerance, pain intensity, and objective and subjective duration of pain were measured in three different situations. In the control situation, the participants did not use any cognitive pain coping strategy. In two other situations, they used distraction and redefining strategies, respectively.

Results

Internally- and externally-oriented participants did not differ in pain tolerance, pain intensity ratings, and subjective duration of painful stimulation in any of the three situations. The use of cognitive pain coping strategies increased pain tolerance in both groups in comparison with the control situation. In both situations, the participants underestimated the duration of pain tolerance. There was no difference between the effectiveness of distraction and redefining strategies on pain tolerance and pain intensity ratings.

Conclusion

Cognitive pain coping strategies increase the duration of pain tolerance irrespective of the individual's locus of control, but have no effect on pain intensity rating.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知疼痛应对策略和控制点对健康个体冷压力痛知觉影响的实验研究
背景本研究的目的是确定应对策略-分散注意力和重新定义-对内部和外部控制点个体疼痛体验的有效性。方法采用冷压法对受试者进行疼痛刺激。在三种不同的情况下测量疼痛耐受性、疼痛强度、客观和主观疼痛持续时间。在对照组中,参与者没有使用任何认知疼痛应对策略。在另外两种情况下,他们分别使用分心和重新定义策略。结果在三种情况下,内向型和外向型的参与者在疼痛耐受性、疼痛强度评分和疼痛刺激的主观持续时间方面没有差异。与对照组相比,认知疼痛应对策略的使用增加了两组的疼痛耐受性。在这两种情况下,参与者都低估了疼痛耐受的持续时间。分散注意力和重新定义策略对疼痛耐受性和疼痛强度评分的影响无显著差异。结论认知性疼痛应对策略增加了个体的疼痛耐受持续时间,但对疼痛强度评分没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Editorial Board Announcement Anaesthesiologist-associated risk factors for inadequate postoperative pain management Continuing use of droperidol in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1