Pain beliefs and coping attempts

Beverly E. Thorn, Martha Anne Rich, Jennifer L. Boothby
{"title":"Pain beliefs and coping attempts","authors":"Beverly E. Thorn,&nbsp;Martha Anne Rich,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Boothby","doi":"10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70002-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A reduction of maladaptive responses to pain is crucial in adjustment to chronic painful states. However, previous research has also demonstrated that adjustment to pain is predicted by interactions between coping attempts and characteristics of individuals. Therefore, we contend that examination of what patients <em>should</em> do, as well as what they <em>should not</em> do is necessary. We propose an alternate model of pain adjustment, within which the constructs of beliefs and coping are separated. Also, catastrophizing is conceptualized as a secondary appraisal, rather than a failed coping attempt. We discuss our assertions within the context of the appropriate distinction between mediator and moderator variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101001,"journal":{"name":"Pain Forum","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 169-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70002-4","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1082317499700024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

A reduction of maladaptive responses to pain is crucial in adjustment to chronic painful states. However, previous research has also demonstrated that adjustment to pain is predicted by interactions between coping attempts and characteristics of individuals. Therefore, we contend that examination of what patients should do, as well as what they should not do is necessary. We propose an alternate model of pain adjustment, within which the constructs of beliefs and coping are separated. Also, catastrophizing is conceptualized as a secondary appraisal, rather than a failed coping attempt. We discuss our assertions within the context of the appropriate distinction between mediator and moderator variables.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痛苦信念和应对尝试
减少对疼痛的不适应反应是适应慢性疼痛状态的关键。然而,先前的研究也表明,对疼痛的适应是通过应对尝试和个体特征之间的相互作用来预测的。因此,我们认为检查病人应该做什么,以及他们不应该做什么是必要的。我们提出了另一种疼痛调整模型,其中信念和应对的结构是分开的。此外,灾难化被概念化为二次评估,而不是失败的应对尝试。我们在适当区分中介变量和调节变量的上下文中讨论我们的断言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author index Subject index The fallacy of using a solitary outcome measure as the standard for satisfactory pain treatment outcome Measuring the impact of pain Old dogs, new tricks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1