Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s40945-023-00159-4
Hugo Jakobsson, Eva Lundqvist, Per Wretenberg, Marcus Sagerfors
{"title":"Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome.","authors":"Hugo Jakobsson,&nbsp;Eva Lundqvist,&nbsp;Per Wretenberg,&nbsp;Marcus Sagerfors","doi":"10.1186/s40945-023-00159-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several factors can influence the outcome after a distal radius fracture (DRF). The aim of this study was to assess whether postoperative pulp-to-palm (PTP) distance correlated with functional outcomes after plate fixation of DRF.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of plate fixation in patients with type-C fractures. Subjects (N = 135) were divided into 2 groups based on PTP distance (equal to or higher than 0 cm) at 4 weeks postoperatively. Outcome measures were collected prospectively at 3, 6 and 12 months and included Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, wrist range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and hand grip strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, at 3 and 6 months patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse outcomes (PRWE, QuickDASH, wrist ROM) than those with PTP =0 cm. At 12 months, QuickDASH and wrist ROM were still significantly worse. In the volar-plating subgroup, patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse wrist ROM and grip strength at 3 months, but no significant differences were found in subsequent follow-ups. In the combined-plating group, patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse QuickDASH, wrist ROM and grip strength at 3 months. At 6 and 12 months, wrist ROM was still significantly worse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurement of PTP distance appears to be useful to identify patients likely to have worse outcome after plating of a DRF. This could be a tool to improve the allocation of hand rehabilitation resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029229/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00159-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Several factors can influence the outcome after a distal radius fracture (DRF). The aim of this study was to assess whether postoperative pulp-to-palm (PTP) distance correlated with functional outcomes after plate fixation of DRF.

Materials & methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of plate fixation in patients with type-C fractures. Subjects (N = 135) were divided into 2 groups based on PTP distance (equal to or higher than 0 cm) at 4 weeks postoperatively. Outcome measures were collected prospectively at 3, 6 and 12 months and included Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, wrist range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and hand grip strength.

Results: Overall, at 3 and 6 months patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse outcomes (PRWE, QuickDASH, wrist ROM) than those with PTP =0 cm. At 12 months, QuickDASH and wrist ROM were still significantly worse. In the volar-plating subgroup, patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse wrist ROM and grip strength at 3 months, but no significant differences were found in subsequent follow-ups. In the combined-plating group, patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse QuickDASH, wrist ROM and grip strength at 3 months. At 6 and 12 months, wrist ROM was still significantly worse.

Conclusions: Measurement of PTP distance appears to be useful to identify patients likely to have worse outcome after plating of a DRF. This could be a tool to improve the allocation of hand rehabilitation resources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡骨远端骨折钢板固定后的髓掌距离与功能结果相对应。
几个因素会影响桡骨远端骨折(DRF)后的预后。本研究的目的是评估DRF钢板固定后术后牙髓到掌(PTP)距离是否与功能预后相关。材料和方法:这是一项随机对照试验的二次分析,旨在研究钢板固定对c型骨折患者的影响。根据术后4周PTP距离(≥0 cm)分为2组,N = 135例。在3个月、6个月和12个月前瞻性收集结果测量,包括患者评定腕关节评估(PRWE)、臂肩和手的快速残疾(QuickDASH)评分、手腕活动范围(ROM)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和手部握力。结果:总体而言,在3个月和6个月时,PTP > 0 cm的患者的预后(PRWE、QuickDASH、腕关节ROM)明显差于PTP =0 cm的患者。在12个月时,QuickDASH和手腕ROM仍然明显恶化。在掌侧镀亚组中,PTP > 0 cm的患者在3个月时腕关节活动度和握力明显较差,但在随后的随访中没有发现显著差异。在联合镀组中,PTP > 0 cm的患者在3个月时QuickDASH、腕关节ROM和握力明显较差。在6个月和12个月时,腕关节ROM仍明显恶化。结论:测量PTP距离似乎有助于识别DRF术后预后可能较差的患者。这可能是一种改善手部康复资源分配的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip microinstability and its association with femoroacetabular impingement: A scoping review. Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective. The psychometric properties of the modified fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire in Parkinson's disease and older adults. Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Implementation of community physiotherapy in primary care: one-year results of an on-call physiotherapy service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1