Sagar C. Saha, Arunik Sanyal, Ramendra K. Kundu, Syamalima Dube , Dipak K. Dube
{"title":"Purification and characterization of two forms of extracellular β-glucosidase from jute pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina","authors":"Sagar C. Saha, Arunik Sanyal, Ramendra K. Kundu, Syamalima Dube , Dipak K. Dube","doi":"10.1016/0005-2744(81)90218-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two forms of β-glucosidase (β-<span>d</span>-glucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) from the culture filtrate of <em>Macrophomina phaseolina</em> were separated and partially purified by (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography (DE-52) and gel filtration. The final preparation was purified 103-fold and 88-fold for β-glucosidase-I and β-glucosidase-II, respectively. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified enzymes imparted a single band at pH 8.3. The two forms differ from each other with respect to molecular weight (323 600 for β-glucosidase I and 220 000 for β-glucosidase II)pH optima, temperature optima, electrophoretic mobility and substrate specificity. The two forms of β-glucosidase may also be differentiated by inhibition experiments using inhibitors like glucono-δ-lactone and nojirimycin. Of the two inhibitors tested nojirimycin is more potent for β-glucosidase-I than that for β-glucosidase-II. The energy of activation for the two enzymes is also different (12.02 kcal/mol for glucosidase I and 10.0 kcal/mol for glucosidase II).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100159,"journal":{"name":"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology","volume":"662 1","pages":"Pages 22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0005-2744(81)90218-7","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0005274481902187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Two forms of β-glucosidase (β-d-glucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) from the culture filtrate of Macrophomina phaseolina were separated and partially purified by (NH4)2SO4 precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography (DE-52) and gel filtration. The final preparation was purified 103-fold and 88-fold for β-glucosidase-I and β-glucosidase-II, respectively. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified enzymes imparted a single band at pH 8.3. The two forms differ from each other with respect to molecular weight (323 600 for β-glucosidase I and 220 000 for β-glucosidase II)pH optima, temperature optima, electrophoretic mobility and substrate specificity. The two forms of β-glucosidase may also be differentiated by inhibition experiments using inhibitors like glucono-δ-lactone and nojirimycin. Of the two inhibitors tested nojirimycin is more potent for β-glucosidase-I than that for β-glucosidase-II. The energy of activation for the two enzymes is also different (12.02 kcal/mol for glucosidase I and 10.0 kcal/mol for glucosidase II).