The production of vulnerability to landslides: the risk habitus in two landslide-prone neighborhoods in Teziutlán, Mexico

Q3 Social Sciences Investigaciones Geograficas Pub Date : 2016-08-01 DOI:10.14350/rig.50663
Bertha Hernandez Aguilar , Naxhelli Ruiz Rivera
{"title":"The production of vulnerability to landslides: the risk habitus in two landslide-prone neighborhoods in Teziutlán, Mexico","authors":"Bertha Hernandez Aguilar , Naxhelli Ruiz Rivera","doi":"10.14350/rig.50663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the social conditions that produce vulnerability to landslides in two neighborhoods of Teziutlan, Puebla.  The goal is to elicit the logic of action that influences vulnerability of these communities, using the concept of risk habitus derived from Bourdieu’s theoretical perspective. This framework provides an analytic framework to understand the social logic and every day decision-making processes that relate to risk perceptions and responses of the residents of these landslide-prone settlements. The methods involved the quantitative interpretation of linkages among variables related to residents’ social, cultural and symbolic capitals, which were collected through two complementary surveys. The selected variables focused on previous disaster experiences and social learning, as well as cooperation networks assessment (solidarity between neighbors, trust in local authorities, experience with disaster situations, perception of risk and attachment to place) in each community. The findings show that individuals’ judgments of their own vulnerability are based on their perceptions of preparedness to face a risk situation; it does not matter the actual hazard level to which they are exposed. This relates to their high level of trust in local authorities and the belief that these authorities will help them in a disaster situation. On the other hand, both neighborhoods are certain about suffering future damages in similar conditions than previous disaster events, even though they have very different objective levels of hazard exposure. In both cases, they strongly believe in their capacity or respond to a landslide, despite that neither of them has invested time or resources in preparedness.","PeriodicalId":39866,"journal":{"name":"Investigaciones Geograficas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14350/rig.50663","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigaciones Geograficas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0188461116300334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper analyzes the social conditions that produce vulnerability to landslides in two neighborhoods of Teziutlan, Puebla.  The goal is to elicit the logic of action that influences vulnerability of these communities, using the concept of risk habitus derived from Bourdieu’s theoretical perspective. This framework provides an analytic framework to understand the social logic and every day decision-making processes that relate to risk perceptions and responses of the residents of these landslide-prone settlements. The methods involved the quantitative interpretation of linkages among variables related to residents’ social, cultural and symbolic capitals, which were collected through two complementary surveys. The selected variables focused on previous disaster experiences and social learning, as well as cooperation networks assessment (solidarity between neighbors, trust in local authorities, experience with disaster situations, perception of risk and attachment to place) in each community. The findings show that individuals’ judgments of their own vulnerability are based on their perceptions of preparedness to face a risk situation; it does not matter the actual hazard level to which they are exposed. This relates to their high level of trust in local authorities and the belief that these authorities will help them in a disaster situation. On the other hand, both neighborhoods are certain about suffering future damages in similar conditions than previous disaster events, even though they have very different objective levels of hazard exposure. In both cases, they strongly believe in their capacity or respond to a landslide, despite that neither of them has invested time or resources in preparedness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滑坡脆弱性的产生:墨西哥Teziutlán两个滑坡易发社区的风险习性
本文分析了普埃布拉州Teziutlan两个社区产生山体滑坡脆弱性的社会条件。目的是利用布迪厄的理论视角衍生的风险习惯概念,引出影响这些社区脆弱性的行为逻辑。该框架提供了一个分析框架,以了解与这些滑坡易发定居点居民的风险认知和反应相关的社会逻辑和日常决策过程。这些方法涉及对与居民的社会、文化和象征资本相关的变量之间的联系进行定量解释,这些变量是通过两次互补调查收集的。选定的变量侧重于每个社区以前的灾害经验和社会学习,以及合作网络评估(邻居之间的团结、对地方当局的信任、对灾害情况的经验、对风险的感知和对地方的依恋)。研究结果表明,个体对自身脆弱性的判断是基于他们对面对风险情况的准备程度的感知;他们所暴露的实际危险程度并不重要。这与他们对地方当局的高度信任有关,并相信这些当局会在灾难情况下帮助他们。另一方面,这两个社区都肯定会在类似于以往灾难事件的情况下遭受未来的损害,尽管它们的客观危险暴露水平非常不同。在这两种情况下,他们都坚信自己有能力应对山体滑坡,尽管他们都没有投入时间或资源进行准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigaciones Geograficas
Investigaciones Geograficas Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigaciones Geográficas, es una revista arbitrada y de circulación internacional, en donde se publican contribuciones de especialistas en geografía y disciplinas afines, con trabajos originales de investigación, ya sean avances teóricos, nuevas tecnologías o estudios de caso sobre la realidad geográfica mexicana y mundial.
期刊最新文献
Editorial María Teresa Gutierrez de McGregor (1927-2017) In Memoriam Trabajo de campo dendrocronológico para estudios de geografía física. Experiencias en los volcanes popocatépetl e iztaccíhuatl, 2006-2017
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1