Kahook Dual Blade versus Trabectome (KVT): Comparing Outcomes in Combination with Cataract Surgery.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S391527
Greg D Fliney, Eliott Kim, Miriam Sarwana, Sze Wong, Tak Yee Tania Tai, Ji Liu, Soshian Sarrafpour, Nisha Chadha, Christopher C Teng
{"title":"Kahook Dual Blade versus Trabectome (KVT): Comparing Outcomes in Combination with Cataract Surgery.","authors":"Greg D Fliney,&nbsp;Eliott Kim,&nbsp;Miriam Sarwana,&nbsp;Sze Wong,&nbsp;Tak Yee Tania Tai,&nbsp;Ji Liu,&nbsp;Soshian Sarrafpour,&nbsp;Nisha Chadha,&nbsp;Christopher C Teng","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S391527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) versus Trabectome with cataract surgery in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications used by patients with glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review comparing eyes after KDB or Trabectome with cataract surgery at 2 academic centers. Surgical success was defined as IOP <21 mmHg with ≥20% IOP reduction at post-operative month 12 (POM12). Changes in IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety eyes in the KDB group and 125 eyes in the Trabectome group were included. Mean changes in IOP at POM12 were -1.9 ± 4.9 mmHg (11.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.002) in the KDB group and -3.5 ± 5.5 mmHg (19.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) in the Trabectome group, without a significant difference between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.20). Mean change in glaucoma medications at POM12 was -0.8 ± 1.5 in the KDB group (58%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and -0.3 ± 1.3 (38%, <i>P</i> = 0.003) in the Trabectome group, with KDB having a greater decrease in medications (<i>P</i> = 0.02). The percentage of eyes achieving success was 30% for the KDB group and 54% for the Trabectome group (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Hyphema was the most common complication, with an incidence of 3% for the KDB group and 14% for the Trabectome group (<i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KDB or Trabectome with cataract surgery is safe and effective at lowering IOP and medication burden, with KDB resulting in a greater reduction in medications and Trabectome more frequently achieving success with an increased incidence of hyphema. Considering the study's limitations, the outcomes were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"145-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/63/opth-17-145.PMC9840398.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S391527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) versus Trabectome with cataract surgery in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications used by patients with glaucoma.

Methods: Retrospective chart review comparing eyes after KDB or Trabectome with cataract surgery at 2 academic centers. Surgical success was defined as IOP <21 mmHg with ≥20% IOP reduction at post-operative month 12 (POM12). Changes in IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and adverse events were assessed.

Results: Ninety eyes in the KDB group and 125 eyes in the Trabectome group were included. Mean changes in IOP at POM12 were -1.9 ± 4.9 mmHg (11.2%, P = 0.002) in the KDB group and -3.5 ± 5.5 mmHg (19.1%, P < 0.001) in the Trabectome group, without a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.20). Mean change in glaucoma medications at POM12 was -0.8 ± 1.5 in the KDB group (58%, P < 0.001) and -0.3 ± 1.3 (38%, P = 0.003) in the Trabectome group, with KDB having a greater decrease in medications (P = 0.02). The percentage of eyes achieving success was 30% for the KDB group and 54% for the Trabectome group (P = 0.01). Hyphema was the most common complication, with an incidence of 3% for the KDB group and 14% for the Trabectome group (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: KDB or Trabectome with cataract surgery is safe and effective at lowering IOP and medication burden, with KDB resulting in a greater reduction in medications and Trabectome more frequently achieving success with an increased incidence of hyphema. Considering the study's limitations, the outcomes were similar.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kahook双刀与小梁刀(KVT):联合白内障手术的疗效比较。
目的:比较Kahook Dual Blade (KDB)与trabecome联合白内障手术在降低青光眼患者眼压(IOP)和用药方面的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性比较两家学术中心的白内障手术后KDB或小梁切除术后的眼睛。手术成功定义为IOP结果:包括KDB组90只眼和trabecome组125只眼。在POM12时,KDB组IOP平均变化为-1.9±4.9 mmHg (11.2%, P = 0.002), trabecome组IOP平均变化为-3.5±5.5 mmHg (19.1%, P < 0.001),两组间无显著差异(P = 0.20)。在POM12时,KDB组青光眼药物的平均变化为-0.8±1.5 (58%,P < 0.001), trabecome组为-0.3±1.3 (38%,P = 0.003), KDB组的药物减少幅度更大(P = 0.02)。KDB组和trabecome组的成功率分别为30%和54% (P = 0.01)。房血是最常见的并发症,KDB组的发生率为3%,trabecome组的发生率为14% (P = 0.01)。结论:KDB或trabecome联合白内障手术在降低IOP和药物负担方面是安全有效的,KDB导致更大的药物减少,而trabecome更频繁地获得成功,但前房积血的发生率增加。考虑到研究的局限性,结果是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal Duration of Monocular Occlusion to Eliminate Fusion Effect in Intermittent Exotropia Time Savings Using a Digital Workflow versus a Conventional for Intraocular Lens Implantation in a Corporate Chain Hospital Setting The Prevalence and Severity of Acquired Blepharoptosis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients and Their Receptivity to Treatment Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis, Management, and Recent Advances Evaluation of Foveal Avascular Zone After Strabismic and Anisometropic Amblyopia Therapy in Saudi Children Using Optic Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1