{"title":"Does cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal?: A meta-analysis","authors":"Amanda A. Draheim, Page L. Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2020.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy improves exaggerated appraisals of threat among people with a primary anxiety disorder. The current meta-analysis of 19 </span>randomized clinical trials (1594 participants) tests whether cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal to a greater extent than wait-list control conditions, non-cognitive behavioral treatments, and active control conditions. A statistically significant and large cumulative effect (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.76, 95% CI: [0.51–1.01], <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy produces greater improvements in threat reappraisal relative to a comparison condition. Heterogeneity of the effect was high (<em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->80.92%). A moderator analyses showed this effect was significant when compared to waitlist control conditions (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.08) non-cognitive behavioral treatments (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37), and active control conditions (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.29). The effect of cognitive behavioral treatment on threat reappraisal was greater for studies on panic disorder (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.06) relative to social anxiety disorder (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>0.60) and generalized anxiety disorder (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.35). Findings from this meta-analysis support cognitive models of anxiety, which assert that cognitive behavioral therapy improves people's ability to make more realistic appraisals of threat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979120300664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy improves exaggerated appraisals of threat among people with a primary anxiety disorder. The current meta-analysis of 19 randomized clinical trials (1594 participants) tests whether cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal to a greater extent than wait-list control conditions, non-cognitive behavioral treatments, and active control conditions. A statistically significant and large cumulative effect (g = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.51–1.01], p < 0.01) indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy produces greater improvements in threat reappraisal relative to a comparison condition. Heterogeneity of the effect was high (I2 = 80.92%). A moderator analyses showed this effect was significant when compared to waitlist control conditions (g = 1.08) non-cognitive behavioral treatments (g = 0.37), and active control conditions (g = 0.29). The effect of cognitive behavioral treatment on threat reappraisal was greater for studies on panic disorder (g = 1.06) relative to social anxiety disorder (g = 0.60) and generalized anxiety disorder (g = 0.35). Findings from this meta-analysis support cognitive models of anxiety, which assert that cognitive behavioral therapy improves people's ability to make more realistic appraisals of threat.