End-of-Life Care of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Compared with Aggressive lymphoma in Patients Who Are Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: An Observational Study in a Japanese Community Hospital.
{"title":"End-of-Life Care of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Compared with Aggressive lymphoma in Patients Who Are Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: An Observational Study in a Japanese Community Hospital.","authors":"Masato Kokaji, Naoto Imoto, Miki Watanabe, Yutaro Suzuki, Shinji Fujiwara, Rie Ito, Toshiyasu Sakai, Satomi Yamamoto, Isamu Sugiura, Shingo Kurahashi","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2022.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) are reported to receive more aggressive care at the end of life (EOL) than patients with solid tumors. However, the reasons behind this occurrence are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine whether the care at EOL for HMs is mainly because of the disease characteristics or hematologists' attitudes and systems of care, we compared the EOL care of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the EOL care of patients with AML and DLBCL younger than 80 years who were receiving combination chemotherapy at a city hospital in Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine patients with AML and 65 with DLBCL were included. Those with AML received chemotherapy more often within their last 30 days (48% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 14 days (37% vs. 1.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) of life, and consulted the palliative team less frequently (5.3% vs. 29%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the last 3 years, the mortality rate in hematological wards decreased from 74% to 29% in the DLBCL group, but only from 95% to 90% in the AML group. In multivariate analysis, AML (odds ratio [OR] 0.065) and death before 2018 (OR, 0.077) were significant factors associated with reduced referrals to specialized palliative teams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with AML tend to have lesser access to specialized palliative care and fewer options for their place of death than those with DLBCL. Detailed EOL care plans are needed for these patients, considering the characteristics of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) are reported to receive more aggressive care at the end of life (EOL) than patients with solid tumors. However, the reasons behind this occurrence are not fully understood.
Objectives: To examine whether the care at EOL for HMs is mainly because of the disease characteristics or hematologists' attitudes and systems of care, we compared the EOL care of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Design: We retrospectively analyzed the EOL care of patients with AML and DLBCL younger than 80 years who were receiving combination chemotherapy at a city hospital in Japan.
Results: Fifty-nine patients with AML and 65 with DLBCL were included. Those with AML received chemotherapy more often within their last 30 days (48% vs. 19%, p < 0.001) and 14 days (37% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) of life, and consulted the palliative team less frequently (5.3% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). In the last 3 years, the mortality rate in hematological wards decreased from 74% to 29% in the DLBCL group, but only from 95% to 90% in the AML group. In multivariate analysis, AML (odds ratio [OR] 0.065) and death before 2018 (OR, 0.077) were significant factors associated with reduced referrals to specialized palliative teams.
Conclusion: Patients with AML tend to have lesser access to specialized palliative care and fewer options for their place of death than those with DLBCL. Detailed EOL care plans are needed for these patients, considering the characteristics of the disease.
背景:据报道,恶性血液病(HMs)患者在生命末期(EOL)比实体瘤患者接受更积极的治疗。然而,这种现象背后的原因尚不完全清楚。目的:比较急性髓性白血病(AML)和弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的EOL护理情况,探讨HMs患者的EOL护理是否主要受疾病特点或血液科医生的态度和护理制度的影响。设计:我们回顾性分析了在日本一家城市医院接受联合化疗的年龄小于80岁的AML和DLBCL患者的EOL护理。结果:共纳入59例AML患者和65例DLBCL患者。AML患者在最后30天内接受化疗的频率更高(48% vs. 19%, p p p)。结论:与DLBCL患者相比,AML患者获得专业姑息治疗的机会较少,死亡地点的选择也较少。考虑到疾病的特点,这些患者需要详细的EOL护理计划。