Frailty in Chile: Development of a Frailty Index Score Using the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Frailty & Aging Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2023.2
F Diaz-Toro, F Petermann-Rocha, N Lynskey, G Nazar, I Cigarroa, C Troncoso Y Concha-Cisternas, A M Leiva-Ordoñez, M A Martinez-Sanguinetti, S Parra-Soto, C Celis-Morales
{"title":"Frailty in Chile: Development of a Frailty Index Score Using the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017.","authors":"F Diaz-Toro,&nbsp;F Petermann-Rocha,&nbsp;N Lynskey,&nbsp;G Nazar,&nbsp;I Cigarroa,&nbsp;C Troncoso Y Concha-Cisternas,&nbsp;A M Leiva-Ordoñez,&nbsp;M A Martinez-Sanguinetti,&nbsp;S Parra-Soto,&nbsp;C Celis-Morales","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Frailty Index (FI) is used to quantify and summarize vulnerability status in people. In Chile, no development and assessment of a FI have been explored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate a FI using representative data from Chilean adults aged 40 years and older stratified by sex.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National representative data from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017 (CNHS 2016-2017).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>3,036 participants older than 40 years with complete data for all variables.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>A 49-item FI was developed and evaluated. This FI included deficits from comorbidities, functional limitations, mental health status, physical activity, anthropometry, medications, and falls. A score between 0 and 1 was calculated for each person. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were employed to evaluate the FI's performance in the population. Comparative analyses were carried out to evaluate the FI score by age (1<60 and ≥ 60 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean FI score was 0.15 (SD:0.09), with a 99% upper limit of 0.46. Scores were greater in women than men (0.17 [SD:0.09]) vs. 0.12 [0.08]); in people older than 80 years (0.22 [0.11]), and in people with ≤8 years of education (0.18 [0.10]) compared with those with >12 years (0.12 [0.08]). The average age-related increase in the FI was 2.3%. When a cut-off point ≥ 0.25 was applied, the prevalence of frail individuals was 11.8% (95% CI: 10.0 to 13.8) in the general population. The prevalence was higher in women 15.9% [95% CI: 13.3 to 18.9] than men 7.4% [95% CI: 5.3 to 10.1]. In a comparative analysis by age, higher FI mean scores and prevalence of frail were observed in people ≥ 60 than younger than 60.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mean FI score and frailty prevalence were higher in women than men, in people with fewer years of formal education, and incremented markedly with age. This FI can be used for early detection of frailty status focusing on women and middle-aged people as a strategy to delay or prevent frailty-related consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The Frailty Index (FI) is used to quantify and summarize vulnerability status in people. In Chile, no development and assessment of a FI have been explored.

Objective: To develop and evaluate a FI using representative data from Chilean adults aged 40 years and older stratified by sex.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: National representative data from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017 (CNHS 2016-2017).

Participants: 3,036 participants older than 40 years with complete data for all variables.

Measurements: A 49-item FI was developed and evaluated. This FI included deficits from comorbidities, functional limitations, mental health status, physical activity, anthropometry, medications, and falls. A score between 0 and 1 was calculated for each person. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were employed to evaluate the FI's performance in the population. Comparative analyses were carried out to evaluate the FI score by age (1<60 and ≥ 60 years).

Results: The mean FI score was 0.15 (SD:0.09), with a 99% upper limit of 0.46. Scores were greater in women than men (0.17 [SD:0.09]) vs. 0.12 [0.08]); in people older than 80 years (0.22 [0.11]), and in people with ≤8 years of education (0.18 [0.10]) compared with those with >12 years (0.12 [0.08]). The average age-related increase in the FI was 2.3%. When a cut-off point ≥ 0.25 was applied, the prevalence of frail individuals was 11.8% (95% CI: 10.0 to 13.8) in the general population. The prevalence was higher in women 15.9% [95% CI: 13.3 to 18.9] than men 7.4% [95% CI: 5.3 to 10.1]. In a comparative analysis by age, higher FI mean scores and prevalence of frail were observed in people ≥ 60 than younger than 60.

Conclusions: The mean FI score and frailty prevalence were higher in women than men, in people with fewer years of formal education, and incremented markedly with age. This FI can be used for early detection of frailty status focusing on women and middle-aged people as a strategy to delay or prevent frailty-related consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智利的脆弱性:利用2016-2017年智利国家健康调查编制脆弱性指数得分。
背景:脆弱性指数(FI)是用来量化和总结人的脆弱性状态。在智利,没有对FI的发展和评估进行探索。目的:利用智利40岁及以上成人按性别分层的代表性数据,开发并评估FI。设计:横断面研究。背景:智利2016-2017年国家健康调查(CNHS 2016-2017)的全国代表性数据。参与者:3036名年龄在40岁以上的参与者,所有变量数据完整。测量:开发并评估了49项FI。该FI包括合并症、功能限制、精神健康状况、身体活动、人体测量、药物治疗和跌倒造成的缺陷。每个人的得分在0到1之间。采用描述性统计和线性回归模型来评估FI在人群中的表现。结果:FI评分平均值为0.15 (SD:0.09), 99%的上限为0.46。女性的得分高于男性(0.17 [SD:0.09])和0.12 [0.08];80岁以上人群(0.22[0.11]),≤8年受教育人群(0.18[0.10])与>12年受教育人群(0.12[0.08])的差异。FI中与年龄相关的平均增幅为2.3%。当临界值≥0.25时,一般人群中体弱个体的患病率为11.8% (95% CI: 10.0 ~ 13.8)。女性的患病率为15.9% [95% CI: 13.3 ~ 18.9],男性为7.4% [95% CI: 5.3 ~ 10.1]。在按年龄进行的比较分析中,60岁以上人群的FI平均评分和虚弱患病率高于60岁以下人群。结论:女性的平均FI评分和虚弱患病率高于男性,在接受正规教育年数较少的人群中,并随着年龄的增长而显著增加。该FI可用于以妇女和中年人为重点的虚弱状态的早期检测,作为延迟或预防虚弱相关后果的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
期刊最新文献
Impact of Cohabitation during Confinement on Older Adults' Negative Affect: What Specificity of Life as a Couple? Relationship of Frailty, Nutritional Status and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Mexico City Nursing Home Residents. A Judo-Based Exercise Program to Reduce Falls and Frailty Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study. The Effect of Frailty on Independent Living After Surgery: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Frailty-Related Factors among Women Living with and without HIV Aged 40 Years and Older. The Women's Interagency HIV Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1