Are we unjustifiably denying intensive care support to patients suffering severe COPD exacerbation?

{"title":"Are we unjustifiably denying intensive care support to patients suffering severe COPD exacerbation?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether clinicians’ prognoses in patients with severe acute exacerbations of obstructive lung disease admitted to intensive care match observed outcomes in terms of survival.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>92 intensive care units and three respiratory high dependency units in the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>832 patients aged 45 years and older with breathlessness, respiratory failure, or change in mental status because of an exacerbation of COPD, asthma, or a combination of the two.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Outcome predicted by clinicians. Observed survival at 180 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>517 patients (62%) survived to 180 days. Clinicians’ prognoses were pessimistic, with a mean predicted survival of 49% at 180 days. For the fifth of patients with the poorest prognosis according to the clinician, the predicted survival rate was 10% and the actual rate was 40%. Information from a database covering 74% of intensive care units in the UK suggested no material difference between units that participated and those that did not. Patients recruited were similar to those not recruited in the same units.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Because decisions on whether to admit patients with COPD or asthma to intensive care for intubation depend on clinicians’ prognoses, some patients who might otherwise survive are probably being denied admission because of unwarranted prognostic pessimism.<br></p><p>Reproduced with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether clinicians’ prognoses in patients with severe acute exacerbations of obstructive lung disease admitted to intensive care match observed outcomes in terms of survival.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

92 intensive care units and three respiratory high dependency units in the United Kingdom.

Participants

832 patients aged 45 years and older with breathlessness, respiratory failure, or change in mental status because of an exacerbation of COPD, asthma, or a combination of the two.

Main outcome measures

Outcome predicted by clinicians. Observed survival at 180 days.

Results

517 patients (62%) survived to 180 days. Clinicians’ prognoses were pessimistic, with a mean predicted survival of 49% at 180 days. For the fifth of patients with the poorest prognosis according to the clinician, the predicted survival rate was 10% and the actual rate was 40%. Information from a database covering 74% of intensive care units in the UK suggested no material difference between units that participated and those that did not. Patients recruited were similar to those not recruited in the same units.

Conclusions

Because decisions on whether to admit patients with COPD or asthma to intensive care for intubation depend on clinicians’ prognoses, some patients who might otherwise survive are probably being denied admission because of unwarranted prognostic pessimism.

Reproduced with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是否不合理地拒绝重症监护支持严重COPD加重患者?
目的确定临床医生对入住重症监护的严重急性加重期阻塞性肺疾病患者的预后是否与观察到的生存结果相匹配。前瞻性队列研究。英国共有92个重症监护病房和3个呼吸高度依赖病房。参与者832名年龄在45岁及以上的患者,由于COPD、哮喘或两者的加重而出现呼吸困难、呼吸衰竭或精神状态改变。主要结果测量:临床医生预测的结果。观察180天存活率。结果517例(62%)患者存活至180 d。临床医生的预后很悲观,平均预测180天的生存率为49%。临床医生认为预后最差的1 / 5患者,预测生存率为10%,实际生存率为40%。从涵盖英国74%重症监护病房的数据库中获取的信息表明,参与和未参与的病房之间没有实质性差异。招募的患者与未在同一单位招募的患者相似。结论:由于决定是否让COPD或哮喘患者接受插管重症监护取决于临床医生的预后,一些原本可能存活的患者可能因为毫无根据的预后悲观而被拒绝入院。经英国医学杂志出版集团有限公司许可转载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial ATS 2009 Conference Report Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction in COPD Investigating a potential role for macrolide therapy in COPD Comparison of new prognostic assessments in COPD patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1