A review of the Brazilian test for rock tensile strength determination. Part I: calculation formula

G.E. Andreev
{"title":"A review of the Brazilian test for rock tensile strength determination. Part I: calculation formula","authors":"G.E. Andreev","doi":"10.1016/0167-9031(91)91006-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is an opinion that the Brazilian test is not valid for materials where the ratio, <em>n = R</em><sub>c</sub>/<em>R</em><sub>t</sub>, between compressive strength, <em>R</em><sub>c</sub>, and tensile strength, <em>R</em><sub>t</sub>, is low. This article supports the view that the Brazilian test is valid for materials which exhibit brittle failure. The continual <em>δ</em> model and <em>β</em> model created on the basis of the effective tensile stress are proposed. According to the latter model: <em>R</em><sub>t</sub> = (2<em>P/πDL</em>)(<em>n</em> + 3/<em>n</em>), of which experimental proofs are given.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100929,"journal":{"name":"Mining Science and Technology","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 445-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-9031(91)91006-4","citationCount":"95","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167903191910064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

Abstract

There is an opinion that the Brazilian test is not valid for materials where the ratio, n = Rc/Rt, between compressive strength, Rc, and tensile strength, Rt, is low. This article supports the view that the Brazilian test is valid for materials which exhibit brittle failure. The continual δ model and β model created on the basis of the effective tensile stress are proposed. According to the latter model: Rt = (2P/πDL)(n + 3/n), of which experimental proofs are given.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西岩石抗拉强度测定试验综述。第一部分:计算公式
有一种观点认为,对于抗压强度Rc和抗拉强度Rt之间的比值n = Rc/Rt较低的材料,巴西试验是无效的。本文支持巴西试验对脆性破坏材料有效的观点。提出了基于有效拉应力的连续δ模型和β模型。根据后一模型:Rt = (2P/πDL)(n + 3/n),给出了实验证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Study of Parameters of Quarry Faces in Muruntau and Myutenbai Open Pits in Case of Applying Major Blasts GEOLOGICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF RIVER BASINS AND SOIL COMPOSITION AS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE FORMATION OF THE STREAMFLOW OF THE TERRITORY (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEBED RIVER BASIN) UNDERGROUND DEVELOPMENT OF ORE DEPOSITS WITH CONSERVATION OF THE GROUND SURFACE RESEARCH DESIGN LINING FOR UTILITIES TUNNEL IN THE CITY BASED ON STATE OF "LINING-MASSIF SOIL" METHODS OF STUDYING THE STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF MOUNTAIN BREEDS ON SAMPLES (QUICK REVIEW)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1