Effects of web-based pre-writing activities on college EFL students’ writing performance and their writing apprehension

Mohammed A. Zaid
{"title":"Effects of web-based pre-writing activities on college EFL students’ writing performance and their writing apprehension","authors":"Mohammed A. Zaid","doi":"10.1016/j.jksult.2011.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assesses whether multimedia-based concept-mapping and online reading before writing affected the quality of students’ compositions and their writing apprehension. The study made use of the <span>Dally and Miller (1975)</span> scale as a measure of writing apprehension and the TOEFL Writing Test Scoring Guidelines as a tool for assessing writing quality. The experimental method of research was utilized, with an experimental design of pre-test–post-test, control group, consisting of two experimental groups and a control group, each of which comprised of 36 students equated on socio-economic and educational status, as well as on language achievement level. Each student wrote three drafts of opinion essays under conditions of multimedia-based concept-mapping, utilizing Blackboard facilities, online reading before writing, and no treatment in the control group. Besides, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to address the questions raised in the study regarding the effect of the treatment conditions on the dependent variables, with a Schefé test as a follow-up test for post-comparisons to identify the directionality of significant differences. Results showed no statistically significant differences overall in the writing under the three conditions. However, students were found to write longer and richer drafts in the conditions of online concept-mapping and online reading before writing, yet poorer, shorter drafts after teacher-led talk in the traditional, no treatment group. The results also revealed that both treatments had significant effects on improving the students’ writing quality; however, they increased the students’ writing apprehension. The study finally bore out recommendations, suggestions and implications for curricular and pedagogical applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.04.003","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210831911000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

This study assesses whether multimedia-based concept-mapping and online reading before writing affected the quality of students’ compositions and their writing apprehension. The study made use of the Dally and Miller (1975) scale as a measure of writing apprehension and the TOEFL Writing Test Scoring Guidelines as a tool for assessing writing quality. The experimental method of research was utilized, with an experimental design of pre-test–post-test, control group, consisting of two experimental groups and a control group, each of which comprised of 36 students equated on socio-economic and educational status, as well as on language achievement level. Each student wrote three drafts of opinion essays under conditions of multimedia-based concept-mapping, utilizing Blackboard facilities, online reading before writing, and no treatment in the control group. Besides, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to address the questions raised in the study regarding the effect of the treatment conditions on the dependent variables, with a Schefé test as a follow-up test for post-comparisons to identify the directionality of significant differences. Results showed no statistically significant differences overall in the writing under the three conditions. However, students were found to write longer and richer drafts in the conditions of online concept-mapping and online reading before writing, yet poorer, shorter drafts after teacher-led talk in the traditional, no treatment group. The results also revealed that both treatments had significant effects on improving the students’ writing quality; however, they increased the students’ writing apprehension. The study finally bore out recommendations, suggestions and implications for curricular and pedagogical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络写作前活动对大学生写作表现和写作理解的影响
本研究旨在评估多媒体概念图和写作前在线阅读是否影响学生的作文质量和写作理解。该研究使用Dally和Miller(1975)量表作为写作理解的衡量标准,并使用托福写作测试评分指南作为评估写作质量的工具。采用实验研究的方法,采用前测后测的实验设计,对照组,包括两个实验组和一个对照组,每组36名学生,社会经济和教育地位相等,语言成就水平相等。每个学生在基于多媒体的概念映射、使用黑板设备、写作前在线阅读和对照组不进行任何治疗的条件下写三篇观点文章草稿。此外,采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验解决研究中提出的有关治疗条件对因变量影响的问题,并采用schef检验作为后比较的随访检验,以确定显著差异的方向性。结果显示,在三种情况下,写作总体上没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,在写作前进行在线概念映射和在线阅读的情况下,学生们写的草稿更长、更丰富,而在传统的、没有治疗的小组中,在老师指导的演讲后,学生们写的草稿更差、更短。结果还显示,两种治疗方法对提高学生的写作质量都有显著的影响;然而,他们增加了学生的写作理解。这项研究最后提出了对课程和教学应用的建议、建议和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Les présupposés comme procédé textuel du non-dit dans l’œuvre dramatique de Yasmina Reza I nomi propri nelle fiabe palermitane di Calvino Theatre’s ‘Green’ agenda: An ecocritical analysis of Lucy Kirkwood’s proto-environmental play The Children 论魔幻现实主义文学以长篇小说《白鹿原》为例 Ecological discourse analysis of Al-Sisi’s climate change speech at the COP-27 Conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1