Perceptions and effects of COVID-19 related information in Denmark and Sweden - a web-based survey about COVID-19 and social media.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s10389-021-01539-5
Sigrid Stjernswärd, Anna-Karin Ivert, Stinne Glasdam
{"title":"Perceptions and effects of COVID-19 related information in Denmark and Sweden - a web-based survey about COVID-19 and social media.","authors":"Sigrid Stjernswärd, Anna-Karin Ivert, Stinne Glasdam","doi":"10.1007/s10389-021-01539-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Extensive COVID-19 information can generate information overload and confusion. Denmark and Sweden adopted different COVID-19 management strategies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare search strategies, perceptions and effects of COVID-19 information, in general and specifically in social media, in residents in Denmark and Sweden.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>Quantitative data from a sample of respondents (<i>n</i> = 616) from Denmark and Sweden on an international web-based survey was analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed similarities between the countries regarding preferred and trusted information sources, use of (social) media, and psychosocial and behavioural effects of such information. Traditional media and social media were frequently used for COVID-19 information. Especially health authorities and researchers were trusted sources, representing the dominant medico-political discourse. There were no differences in negative effect and social behaviour. Residents in Denmark experienced significantly more positive effects than residents in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Summarily, the study showed similarities and small differences among residents in both countries related to usage patterns, perceptions and effects of COVID-19 information from (social) media, despite diverging strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":29967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10389-021-01539-5","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01539-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Aim: Extensive COVID-19 information can generate information overload and confusion. Denmark and Sweden adopted different COVID-19 management strategies.

Aim: This study aimed to compare search strategies, perceptions and effects of COVID-19 information, in general and specifically in social media, in residents in Denmark and Sweden.

Subject and methods: Quantitative data from a sample of respondents (n = 616) from Denmark and Sweden on an international web-based survey was analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics.

Results: The results showed similarities between the countries regarding preferred and trusted information sources, use of (social) media, and psychosocial and behavioural effects of such information. Traditional media and social media were frequently used for COVID-19 information. Especially health authorities and researchers were trusted sources, representing the dominant medico-political discourse. There were no differences in negative effect and social behaviour. Residents in Denmark experienced significantly more positive effects than residents in Sweden.

Conclusion: Summarily, the study showed similarities and small differences among residents in both countries related to usage patterns, perceptions and effects of COVID-19 information from (social) media, despite diverging strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦和瑞典对COVID-19相关信息的看法和影响——关于COVID-19和社交媒体的网络调查。
目的:广泛的COVID-19信息可能导致信息过载和混乱。丹麦和瑞典采取了不同的COVID-19管理战略。目的:本研究旨在比较丹麦和瑞典居民对COVID-19信息的搜索策略、看法和影响,特别是在社交媒体上。主题和方法:利用描述性和分析性统计分析了一项基于网络的国际调查中来自丹麦和瑞典的受访者样本(n = 616)的定量数据。结果:结果显示,在首选和可信赖的信息来源、(社交)媒体的使用以及此类信息的心理和行为影响方面,各国之间存在相似之处。传统媒体和社交媒体被频繁使用。特别是卫生当局和研究人员是可信的来源,代表了占主导地位的医学政治话语。在负面影响和社会行为方面没有差异。丹麦居民比瑞典居民体验到更多的积极影响。结论:总之,该研究表明,尽管两国居民的策略不同,但两国居民在(社交)媒体上对COVID-19信息的使用模式、看法和影响方面存在相似之处和微小差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between life satisfaction, personal health, quality of life, and medication adherence among adolescents living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. Self-reported health among immigrants in Luxembourg: insights from a nationally representative sample. Levelling Up for health in towns? Development of a new deprivation index: the 'Stronger Towns Index' and its association with self-rated health and migration in England, between 2001 and 2011. Social networks and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among older adults in the Netherlands. Racial disparities in lifestyle habits and dietary patterns in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1