Exploring unique device identifier implementation and use for real-world evidence: a mixed-methods study with NESTcc health system network collaborators.

Sanket S Dhruva, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Joseph S Ross, Joseph P Drozda, Natalia A Wilson
{"title":"Exploring unique device identifier implementation and use for real-world evidence: a mixed-methods study with NESTcc health system network collaborators.","authors":"Sanket S Dhruva,&nbsp;Jennifer L Ridgeway,&nbsp;Joseph S Ross,&nbsp;Joseph P Drozda,&nbsp;Natalia A Wilson","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the current state of unique device identifier (UDI) implementation, including barriers and facilitators, among eight health systems participating in a research network committed to real-world evidence (RWE) generation for medical devices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods, including a structured survey and semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight health systems participating in the National Evaluation System for health Technology research network within the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals identified as being involved in or knowledgeable about UDI implementation or medical device identification from supply chain, information technology and high-volume procedural area(s) in their health system.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Interview topics were related to UDI implementation, including barriers and facilitators; UDI use; benefits of UDI adoption; and vision for UDI implementation. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, drawing on prior conceptual models of UDI implementation and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. A brief survey of health system characteristics and scope of UDI implementation was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five individuals completed interviews. Three of eight health systems reported having implemented UDI. Themes identified about barriers and facilitators to UDI implementation included knowledge of the UDI and its benefits among decision-makers; organisational systems, culture and networks that support technology and workflow changes; and external factors such as policy mandates and technology. A final theme focused on the availability of UDIs for RWE; lack of availability significantly hindered RWE studies on medical devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UDI adoption within health systems requires knowledge of and impetus to achieve operational and clinical benefits. These are necessary to support UDI availability for medical device safety and effectiveness studies and RWE generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/47/bmjsit-2022-000167.PMC9872505.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the current state of unique device identifier (UDI) implementation, including barriers and facilitators, among eight health systems participating in a research network committed to real-world evidence (RWE) generation for medical devices.

Design: Mixed methods, including a structured survey and semistructured interviews.

Setting: Eight health systems participating in the National Evaluation System for health Technology research network within the USA.

Participants: Individuals identified as being involved in or knowledgeable about UDI implementation or medical device identification from supply chain, information technology and high-volume procedural area(s) in their health system.

Main outcomes measures: Interview topics were related to UDI implementation, including barriers and facilitators; UDI use; benefits of UDI adoption; and vision for UDI implementation. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, drawing on prior conceptual models of UDI implementation and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. A brief survey of health system characteristics and scope of UDI implementation was also conducted.

Results: Thirty-five individuals completed interviews. Three of eight health systems reported having implemented UDI. Themes identified about barriers and facilitators to UDI implementation included knowledge of the UDI and its benefits among decision-makers; organisational systems, culture and networks that support technology and workflow changes; and external factors such as policy mandates and technology. A final theme focused on the availability of UDIs for RWE; lack of availability significantly hindered RWE studies on medical devices.

Conclusions: UDI adoption within health systems requires knowledge of and impetus to achieve operational and clinical benefits. These are necessary to support UDI availability for medical device safety and effectiveness studies and RWE generation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索独特的设备标识符的实现和使用的现实世界的证据:与NESTcc卫生系统网络合作者的混合方法研究。
目的:研究参与致力于医疗器械真实世界证据(RWE)生成研究网络的八个卫生系统中唯一设备标识符(UDI)实施的现状,包括障碍和促进因素。设计:混合方法,包括结构化调查和半结构化访谈。环境:参与美国国家卫生技术研究网络评估系统的8个卫生系统。参与者:被确定参与或了解UDI实施或医疗器械识别的个人,来自其卫生系统中的供应链、信息技术和大批量程序领域。主要结果测量:访谈主题与UDI的实施有关,包括障碍和促进因素;UDI使用;采用UDI的好处;以及UDI实施的愿景。使用定向内容分析分析数据,借鉴UDI实施的先前概念模型和探索、准备、实施、维持框架。对卫生系统特点和UDI实施范围进行了简要调查。结果:35人完成访谈。8个卫生系统中有3个报告实施了全民统一免疫。确定的关于UDI实施的障碍和促进因素的主题包括决策者对UDI的了解及其益处;支持技术和工作流程变化的组织系统、文化和网络;以及政策指令和技术等外部因素。最后一个主题是RWE的udi可用性;缺乏可用性严重阻碍了RWE对医疗器械的研究。结论:在卫生系统内采用UDI需要了解并推动实现业务和临床效益。这些对于支持UDI用于医疗器械安全性和有效性研究以及RWE生成是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation. No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1