Emissions related to munitions firing: A case study of nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and energetic residue from detonable munitions

R. Szostak, K. Cleare
{"title":"Emissions related to munitions firing: A case study of nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and energetic residue from detonable munitions","authors":"R. Szostak,&nbsp;K. Cleare","doi":"10.1002/ffej.3330110309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Overall, the detonation of munitions represents an environmentally clean reaction. Six kilotons of energetic materials were expended in this case study during training in 1996. These included nitrocellulose (55 percent), trinitrotoluene (TNT) (30 percent), nitroglycerine (5 percent), nitroguanidine (4 percent), dinitrotoluene (DNT) (3 percent), and Royal Dutch Explosive (RDX) (3 percent). Based on previously reported test data (BangBox), energetic detonation emissions of environmental concern were calculated to be less than 1 percent. This residue contains nitrogen oxides (88 percent), a mix of volatile organic compounds (11 percent), and possibly undetonated RDX (&lt;1 percent). Preliminary assessment of emissions produced by munitions in this study indicates that both nitrogen oxide (NOX) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions are low relative to other NOX and VOC producing activities including emissions from biogenic (natural) sources. Though the amount of undetonated RDX is low, further work is needed to validate this number and determine whether this source represents any significant health or environmental impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":100523,"journal":{"name":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"87-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ffej.3330110309","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffej.3330110309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Overall, the detonation of munitions represents an environmentally clean reaction. Six kilotons of energetic materials were expended in this case study during training in 1996. These included nitrocellulose (55 percent), trinitrotoluene (TNT) (30 percent), nitroglycerine (5 percent), nitroguanidine (4 percent), dinitrotoluene (DNT) (3 percent), and Royal Dutch Explosive (RDX) (3 percent). Based on previously reported test data (BangBox), energetic detonation emissions of environmental concern were calculated to be less than 1 percent. This residue contains nitrogen oxides (88 percent), a mix of volatile organic compounds (11 percent), and possibly undetonated RDX (<1 percent). Preliminary assessment of emissions produced by munitions in this study indicates that both nitrogen oxide (NOX) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions are low relative to other NOX and VOC producing activities including emissions from biogenic (natural) sources. Though the amount of undetonated RDX is low, further work is needed to validate this number and determine whether this source represents any significant health or environmental impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与弹药发射有关的排放:对可爆弹药的氮氧化物、挥发性有机化合物和高能残留物的案例研究
总的来说,引爆弹药是一种无害环境的反应。1996年培训期间,在这个案例研究中使用了6千吨高能材料。其中包括硝化纤维(55%)、三硝基甲苯(TNT)(30%)、硝化甘油(5%)、硝基胍(4%)、二硝基甲苯(DNT)(3%)和荷兰皇家炸药(RDX)(3%)。根据先前报告的测试数据(BangBox),计算出对环境有影响的高能爆炸排放小于1%。这些残留物含有氮氧化物(88%),挥发性有机化合物的混合物(11%),以及可能未引爆的RDX(1%)。本研究中对弹药产生的排放进行的初步评估表明,与其他产生氮氧化物和挥发性有机化合物的活动(包括生物源(自然)源的排放)相比,氮氧化物和挥发性有机化合物的排放都很低。虽然未引爆的RDX数量很低,但需要进一步的工作来验证这一数字,并确定这一来源是否会对健康或环境产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
วัตถุประสงค์และภารกิจของกฎหมายส่งเสริมเศรษฐกิจหมุนเวียน การประเมินผลกระทบทางสุขภาพจากการผลิตทางการเกษตร: แนวคิดและการปฏิบัติสู่ข้อเสนอเชิงนโยบายสาธารณะเพื่อสุขภาพ พื้นผิวภายในอาคาร: เหตุใดจึงสำคัญต่อคุณภาพอากาศภายในอาคาร หลักการเก็บค่าธรรมเนียมการจัดการมูลฝอยตามปริมาณ ที่ทิ้ง ตอนที่ 1 กรณีศึกษาและถอดบทเรียนของนานาประเทศ นวัตกรรมทางสังคมกับการบริหารจัดการน้ำเพื่อรับมือภัยแล้ง – กรณีศึกษาวิสาหกิจชุมชนกลุ่มผู้ปลูกไผ่ อำเภอท่าตะเกียบ จังหวัดฉะเชิงเทรา
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1