The effect of the Iranian family approach-specific course (IrFASC) on obtaining consent from deceased organ donors' families.

Ehsan Radi, Matin Ghanavati, Batoul Khoundabi, Jamal Rahmani, Katayoun Nahafizadeh, Mahdi Shadnoush, Behrooz Broumand, Omid Ghobadi
{"title":"The effect of the Iranian family approach-specific course (IrFASC) on obtaining consent from deceased organ donors' families.","authors":"Ehsan Radi,&nbsp;Matin Ghanavati,&nbsp;Batoul Khoundabi,&nbsp;Jamal Rahmani,&nbsp;Katayoun Nahafizadeh,&nbsp;Mahdi Shadnoush,&nbsp;Behrooz Broumand,&nbsp;Omid Ghobadi","doi":"10.4285/kjt.22.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A family approach and obtaining consent from the families of potential brain-dead donors is the most important step of organ procurement in countries where an opt-in policy applies to organ donation. Health care staff's communication skills and ability to have conversations about donation under circumstances of grief and emotion play a crucial role in families' decision-making process and, consequently, the consent rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A new training course, called the Iranian family approach-specific course (IrFASC), was designed with the aim of improving interviewers' skills and knowledge, sharing experiences, and increasing coordinators' confidence. The IrFASC was administered to three groups of coordinators. The family consent rate of participants in the same intervals (12 months for group 1, 6 months for group 2, and 3 months for group 3) was measured before and after the training course. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to make comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The family consent rate was significantly different for all participants before and after the training, increasing from 50.0% to 62.5% (P=0.037). Furthermore, sex (P=0.005), previous training (P=0.090), education (P=0.068), and duration of work as a coordinator (P=0.008) had significant effects on the difference in families' consent rates before and after IrFASC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the IrFASC training method could improve the success of coordinators in obtaining family consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":33357,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","volume":"36 4","pages":"237-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/9d/kjt-36-4-237.PMC9832597.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/kjt.22.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A family approach and obtaining consent from the families of potential brain-dead donors is the most important step of organ procurement in countries where an opt-in policy applies to organ donation. Health care staff's communication skills and ability to have conversations about donation under circumstances of grief and emotion play a crucial role in families' decision-making process and, consequently, the consent rate.

Methods: A new training course, called the Iranian family approach-specific course (IrFASC), was designed with the aim of improving interviewers' skills and knowledge, sharing experiences, and increasing coordinators' confidence. The IrFASC was administered to three groups of coordinators. The family consent rate of participants in the same intervals (12 months for group 1, 6 months for group 2, and 3 months for group 3) was measured before and after the training course. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to make comparisons.

Results: The family consent rate was significantly different for all participants before and after the training, increasing from 50.0% to 62.5% (P=0.037). Furthermore, sex (P=0.005), previous training (P=0.090), education (P=0.068), and duration of work as a coordinator (P=0.008) had significant effects on the difference in families' consent rates before and after IrFASC.

Conclusions: This study showed that the IrFASC training method could improve the success of coordinators in obtaining family consent.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗家庭方法特定课程(IrFASC)对获得已故器官捐赠者家属同意的影响。
背景:在实行器官捐赠选择政策的国家,家庭途径和获得潜在脑死亡捐赠者家属的同意是器官获取的最重要步骤。医护人员的沟通技巧和在悲伤和情绪的情况下就捐赠进行对话的能力在家属的决策过程中起着至关重要的作用,因此也影响了同意率。方法:设计了一个新的培训课程,称为伊朗家庭方法特定课程(IrFASC),旨在提高采访者的技能和知识,分享经验,增加协调员的信心。国际财务财务委员会由三组协调员管理。在相同的时间间隔(第1组为12个月,第2组为6个月,第3组为3个月),在培训课程前后测量参与者的家庭同意率。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。结果:所有参与者培训前后的家庭同意率均有显著差异,从50.0%增加到62.5% (P=0.037)。此外,性别(P=0.005)、以前的培训(P=0.090)、教育程度(P=0.068)和作为协调员的工作时间(P=0.008)对IrFASC前后家庭同意率的差异有显著影响。结论:本研究表明,IrFASC培训方法可以提高协调人获得家属同意的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Transplantation
Korean Journal of Transplantation Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inferior polar nephrectomy and vesicocalicostomy for complete ureteric stricture following antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplant: a report of a rare case. Overcoming the longest cold ischemia time yet seen in Korea using hypothermic machine perfusion in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a case report. Patient management for thoracic organ donor candidates: the lung transplantation team's view. Surgical techniques for robotic right donor hepatectomy, part 2: robotic parenchymal transection and bile duct division. Surgical techniques for robotic right donor hepatectomy, part 1: robotic hilar dissection and right lobe mobilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1