The Procrustean fitting of trade marks under the requirements of clear and precise subject-matter in the EU trade mark law—A case of position marks

Lavinia Brancusi
{"title":"The Procrustean fitting of trade marks under the requirements of clear and precise subject-matter in the EU trade mark law—A case of position marks","authors":"Lavinia Brancusi","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the European Union Trademark law (EUTM), clear and precise subject-matter of a trade mark is a prerequisite of proper filing and determines the conditions and scope of protection. Registration rules have evolved together with the meaning of this standard. The paper examines the legal status of position marks, which lacked their own registration specifics within initial EUTM, and thus were usually filed through other categories (figurative, colour, three-dimensional), and contrasts this practice with the registration scheme of the new law. The analysis looks into the effects of Court of Justice's guidance when retroactively applied to trade marks registered upon earlier law. The exemplary case of a blade of grass inside a bottle is used to map the meaning of ‘unaligned’ description and/or indication vis-à-vis the prime relevance of (graphic) representation. The final part explores how identifying the subject-matter of a position mark has an impact on assessing its distinctiveness, engaging within functionality objections and proving genuine use. The paper advocates for refraining from applying a fixed understanding of the requirement of clear and precise subject-matter, especially with regard to old registrations, and, a fortiori, to flexible subject-matter, such as position signs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"25 1","pages":"45-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the European Union Trademark law (EUTM), clear and precise subject-matter of a trade mark is a prerequisite of proper filing and determines the conditions and scope of protection. Registration rules have evolved together with the meaning of this standard. The paper examines the legal status of position marks, which lacked their own registration specifics within initial EUTM, and thus were usually filed through other categories (figurative, colour, three-dimensional), and contrasts this practice with the registration scheme of the new law. The analysis looks into the effects of Court of Justice's guidance when retroactively applied to trade marks registered upon earlier law. The exemplary case of a blade of grass inside a bottle is used to map the meaning of ‘unaligned’ description and/or indication vis-à-vis the prime relevance of (graphic) representation. The final part explores how identifying the subject-matter of a position mark has an impact on assessing its distinctiveness, engaging within functionality objections and proving genuine use. The paper advocates for refraining from applying a fixed understanding of the requirement of clear and precise subject-matter, especially with regard to old registrations, and, a fortiori, to flexible subject-matter, such as position signs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟商标法中标的物明确、准确要求下的商标符合性——定位商标案例
在欧盟商标法(EUTM)中,明确和准确的商标主题是正确申请的先决条件,并决定了保护的条件和范围。注册规则随着本标准的含义而演变。本文研究了位置标志的法律地位,这些标志在最初的EUTM中缺乏自己的注册细节,因此通常通过其他类别(形象的、彩色的、三维的)进行归档,并将这种做法与新法律的注册方案进行了对比。分析了法院的指导意见在追溯适用于根据早期法律注册的商标时的影响。以瓶子里的一片草叶为例,将“未对齐”描述和/或指示的含义映射到-à-vis(图形)表示的主要相关性。最后一部分探讨了如何识别位置标记的主题对评估其独特性,参与功能异议和证明真正使用的影响。本文主张避免对明确和精确的主题的要求采用固定的理解,特别是关于旧注册,并且,更重要的是,对灵活的主题,如位置标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The flexibilization of intellectual property rights in cases of health crises: A case study of Brazil in the face of the AIDS and COVID sanitary crises Factors influencing the prioritisation of access to medicines in trade-related intellectual property policymaking in Thailand Law libraries, copyright and digital lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1