Biodiversity, Endemism, Sense of Place, and Public Health: Inter-relationships for Australian Inland Aquatic Systems

Pierre Horwitz, Michael Lindsay, Moira O'Connor
{"title":"Biodiversity, Endemism, Sense of Place, and Public Health: Inter-relationships for Australian Inland Aquatic Systems","authors":"Pierre Horwitz,&nbsp;Michael Lindsay,&nbsp;Moira O'Connor","doi":"10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.01044.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b> Natural resource managers have articulated “health” narrowly and vaguely as the condition of the biophysical environment. It is too tempting for natural resource managers to take data generated from rapid assessment techniques of biophysical condition (like species richness) as surrogates for “biodiversity.” This paper takes the view that these common applications of the terms “health” and “biodiversity” obscure a meaningful search for the relationships between biodiversity, human health, and the socioeconomic well-being of human communities. Using examples of landscapes and inland waters in Australia, we argue that the biodiversity of inland waters and human health are linked in at least two ways. Biodiversity, and its endemic features, contribute to a person's attachment to a particular place and become part of a person's identity. Loss, destruction, or change in a location has the potential to affect an individual's psychological well-being, and challenge a community's identity and image of itself. Any inland waterway also has the potential to harbor biota that can directly affect the health of humans. We are exposed to this biota when we develop locations inappropriately, when we (mis)treat inland waters, or as a by-product of other land and water developments. Our health may be compromised by attempts to control this biota. And our perceptions of a place may change dramatically according to the presence of these and other organisms, or according to our efforts at their control, as illustrated by cases involving wetlands, mosquitoes, and arboviruses. We conclude by arguing that the health of inland aquatic systems will be best articulated by intertwining biodiversity, endemism, perception of place, environmental (landscape) degradation, disease-causing organisms, and management of the aquatic resource. The health sector and natural resource management agencies are encouraged to recognize the synergies between these issues in their policies and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":100392,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Health","volume":"7 4","pages":"253-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.01044.x","citationCount":"112","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.01044.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112

Abstract

ABSTRACT Natural resource managers have articulated “health” narrowly and vaguely as the condition of the biophysical environment. It is too tempting for natural resource managers to take data generated from rapid assessment techniques of biophysical condition (like species richness) as surrogates for “biodiversity.” This paper takes the view that these common applications of the terms “health” and “biodiversity” obscure a meaningful search for the relationships between biodiversity, human health, and the socioeconomic well-being of human communities. Using examples of landscapes and inland waters in Australia, we argue that the biodiversity of inland waters and human health are linked in at least two ways. Biodiversity, and its endemic features, contribute to a person's attachment to a particular place and become part of a person's identity. Loss, destruction, or change in a location has the potential to affect an individual's psychological well-being, and challenge a community's identity and image of itself. Any inland waterway also has the potential to harbor biota that can directly affect the health of humans. We are exposed to this biota when we develop locations inappropriately, when we (mis)treat inland waters, or as a by-product of other land and water developments. Our health may be compromised by attempts to control this biota. And our perceptions of a place may change dramatically according to the presence of these and other organisms, or according to our efforts at their control, as illustrated by cases involving wetlands, mosquitoes, and arboviruses. We conclude by arguing that the health of inland aquatic systems will be best articulated by intertwining biodiversity, endemism, perception of place, environmental (landscape) degradation, disease-causing organisms, and management of the aquatic resource. The health sector and natural resource management agencies are encouraged to recognize the synergies between these issues in their policies and practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物多样性,地方性,地方感和公共卫生:澳大利亚内陆水生系统的相互关系
自然资源管理者将“健康”狭隘而模糊地表述为生物物理环境的条件。对于自然资源管理者来说,将生物物理条件(如物种丰富度)的快速评估技术产生的数据作为“生物多样性”的替代品太诱人了。本文认为,“健康”和“生物多样性”这两个术语的这些常见应用掩盖了对生物多样性、人类健康和人类社区社会经济福祉之间关系的有意义的研究。以澳大利亚的景观和内陆水域为例,我们认为内陆水域的生物多样性与人类健康至少在两个方面存在联系。生物多样性及其特有的特征有助于一个人对一个特定地方的依恋,并成为一个人身份的一部分。一个地点的损失、破坏或改变有可能影响个人的心理健康,并挑战一个社区的身份和形象。任何内河航道都有可能孕育直接影响人类健康的生物群。当我们不适当地开发地点时,当我们(错误地)处理内陆水域时,或者作为其他土地和水开发的副产品时,我们就会暴露在这些生物群中。我们的健康可能会因试图控制这种生物群而受到损害。我们对一个地方的看法可能会根据这些生物和其他生物的存在,或者根据我们控制它们的努力而发生巨大变化,湿地、蚊子和虫媒病毒的例子就说明了这一点。我们的结论是,内陆水生系统的健康将最好地通过相互交织的生物多样性、地方性、地点感知、环境(景观)退化、致病生物和水生资源管理来表达。鼓励卫生部门和自然资源管理机构在其政策和做法中认识到这些问题之间的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOOK REVIEW BOOK REVIEW BOOK REVIEW BOOK REVIEW Logical Interrelations between Four Sustainability Parameters: Stability, Continuation, Longevity, and Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1