Labour Traditions of International Order and the Dilemma of Action Towards Iran

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS British Journal of Politics & International Relations Pub Date : 2012-09-19 DOI:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00529.x
Chris Kitchen, Rhiannon Vickers
{"title":"Labour Traditions of International Order and the Dilemma of Action Towards Iran","authors":"Chris Kitchen,&nbsp;Rhiannon Vickers","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00529.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The New Labour governments viewed Iran as one of their most significant foreign policy challenges. This article argues that they drew heavily on Labour traditions of international order, interests and community in framing and understanding the kinds of threat presented by Iran, as well as in seeking policy responses to meet them. Iran presented a serious challenge to the authority of international organisations and regional and global non-proliferation regimes, all of which were cherished within Labour's internationalist traditions. UK policy towards Iran remained consistent with these internationalist traditions through successive iterations, including support for international institutions, diplomatic engagement and multilateral sanctions. Yet the Blair and Brown governments also faced a mounting policy dilemma by which the application of cherished internationalist traditions failed to achieve desired results, while Iranian centrifuges continued spinning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"15 2","pages":"299-316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00529.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00529.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The New Labour governments viewed Iran as one of their most significant foreign policy challenges. This article argues that they drew heavily on Labour traditions of international order, interests and community in framing and understanding the kinds of threat presented by Iran, as well as in seeking policy responses to meet them. Iran presented a serious challenge to the authority of international organisations and regional and global non-proliferation regimes, all of which were cherished within Labour's internationalist traditions. UK policy towards Iran remained consistent with these internationalist traditions through successive iterations, including support for international institutions, diplomatic engagement and multilateral sanctions. Yet the Blair and Brown governments also faced a mounting policy dilemma by which the application of cherished internationalist traditions failed to achieve desired results, while Iranian centrifuges continued spinning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际秩序的劳工传统与对伊朗行动的困境
新工党政府将伊朗视为其最重大的外交政策挑战之一。本文认为,他们在制定和理解伊朗所带来的各种威胁,以及寻求应对这些威胁的政策时,大量借鉴了工党在国际秩序、利益和社区方面的传统。伊朗对国际组织以及地区和全球核不扩散机制的权威构成了严重挑战,而这些都是工党国际主义传统所珍视的。英国对伊朗的政策始终与这些国际主义传统相一致,包括支持国际机构、外交接触和多边制裁。然而,布莱尔和布朗政府也面临着一个日益严重的政策困境:他们珍视的国际主义传统未能获得预期的效果,而伊朗的离心机却在继续旋转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Crisis politics of dehumanisation during COVID-19: A framework for mapping the social processes through which dehumanisation undermines human dignity. Britain's COVID-19 battle: The role of political leaders in shaping the responses to the pandemic. COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and the failure of global cooperation. Alcohol policy, multi-level governance and corporate political strategy: The campaign for Scotland's minimum unit pricing in Edinburgh, London and Brussels. 'The Pope's own hand outstretched': Holy See diplomacy as a hybrid mode of diplomatic agency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1