Frequency of Modification of Pharmacological Treatment Is Equivalent for Virtual and In-Person Psychiatric Visits.

Amal Mumtaz, Aisha O Adigun, Rif S El-Mallakh
{"title":"Frequency of Modification of Pharmacological Treatment Is Equivalent for Virtual and In-Person Psychiatric Visits.","authors":"Amal Mumtaz,&nbsp;Aisha O Adigun,&nbsp;Rif S El-Mallakh","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus pandemic there was a rapid adoption of telehealth services in psychiatry, which now accounts for 40% of all visits. There is a dearth of information about the relative efficacy of virtual and in-person psychiatric evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the rate of medication changes during virtual and in-person visits as a proxy for the equivalence of clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 280 visits among 173 patients were evaluated. The majority of these visits were telehealth (224, 80%). There were 96 medication changes among the telehealth visits (42.8%) and 21 among the in-person visits (37.5%) (<i>z</i> = -1.4, <i>p</i> = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians were equally as likely to order a medication change if they saw their patient virtually or in person. This suggests that remote assessments yielded similar conclusions to in-person assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"44-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus pandemic there was a rapid adoption of telehealth services in psychiatry, which now accounts for 40% of all visits. There is a dearth of information about the relative efficacy of virtual and in-person psychiatric evaluations.

Methods: We examined the rate of medication changes during virtual and in-person visits as a proxy for the equivalence of clinical decision-making.

Results: A total of 280 visits among 173 patients were evaluated. The majority of these visits were telehealth (224, 80%). There were 96 medication changes among the telehealth visits (42.8%) and 21 among the in-person visits (37.5%) (z = -1.4, p = 0.16).

Conclusion: Clinicians were equally as likely to order a medication change if they saw their patient virtually or in person. This suggests that remote assessments yielded similar conclusions to in-person assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修改药物治疗的频率对于虚拟和面对面的精神病学访问是相同的。
背景:在冠状病毒大流行期间,精神病学迅速采用了远程医疗服务,目前占所有就诊的40%。关于虚拟和面对面精神评估的相对疗效的信息缺乏。方法:我们检查了虚拟和面对面访问期间的药物变化率,作为临床决策等效性的代理。结果:173例患者共280次就诊。其中大多数是远程医疗(224,80%)。远程就诊的药物变更96种(42.8%),现场就诊的药物变更21种(37.5%)(z = -1.4, p = 0.16)。结论:临床医生在虚拟或亲自见到病人时,同样有可能要求更换药物。这表明远程评估得出的结论与现场评估相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1