An evaluation of moral distress among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Palestine.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12829

Hussein ALMasri, Omar Rimawi

{"title":"An evaluation of moral distress among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Palestine.","authors":"Hussein ALMasri, Omar Rimawi","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) is considered a serious issue in all aspects of healthcare divisions, which needs an urgent intervention.Aims: The study aims at evaluating moral distress among HCWs which will help the healthcare management and decision-makers in hospitals and health centers to act in a comprehensiveness and effective way by reinforcing moral thinking and behavior in selected coronavirus (COVID-19) quarantine centers across Palestine.Methods: Ninety-four HCWs were selected by convenience sampling method. Data were collected using revised Corley's Standard Moral Distress (MD) Scale and analyzed using SPSS software version 23.Results: The mean score of MD for HCWs was low (1.24 ± 0.71). The mean score of MD severity was moderate (1.4 ± 0.93). The severity and frequency of MD in HCWs had a significant reverse relationship with years of experience, number of children of worker, and duration of work with COVID-19 patients.Conclusion: It is important to create a professional psychological support system for HCWs to decrease MD when facing moral issues.","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1220-1226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877787/pdf/NUF-57-1220.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Moral distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) is considered a serious issue in all aspects of healthcare divisions, which needs an urgent intervention.

Aims: The study aims at evaluating moral distress among HCWs which will help the healthcare management and decision-makers in hospitals and health centers to act in a comprehensiveness and effective way by reinforcing moral thinking and behavior in selected coronavirus (COVID-19) quarantine centers across Palestine.

Methods: Ninety-four HCWs were selected by convenience sampling method. Data were collected using revised Corley's Standard Moral Distress (MD) Scale and analyzed using SPSS software version 23.

Results: The mean score of MD for HCWs was low (1.24 ± 0.71). The mean score of MD severity was moderate (1.4 ± 0.93). The severity and frequency of MD in HCWs had a significant reverse relationship with years of experience, number of children of worker, and duration of work with COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion: It is important to create a professional psychological support system for HCWs to decrease MD when facing moral issues.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

巴勒斯坦COVID-19大流行期间医护人员道德困境评估

背景:卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的道德困扰被认为是卫生保健部门各个方面的一个严重问题，需要紧急干预。目的:本研究旨在评估卫生保健工作者的道德困境，通过在巴勒斯坦选定的冠状病毒(COVID-19)隔离中心加强道德思维和行为，帮助医院和卫生中心的卫生保健管理和决策者全面有效地采取行动。方法:采用方便抽样法抽取94例卫生保健人员。采用修订后的Corley's Standard Moral Distress (MD)量表收集数据，采用SPSS软件23版进行分析。结果:HCWs患者的MD平均评分较低(1.24±0.71)。MD严重程度平均评分为中度(1.4±0.93)。医护人员MD的严重程度和频率与工作年限、子女数量以及与COVID-19患者一起工作的时间呈显著负相关。结论:建立专业的医护人员心理支持体系是降低医护人员道德问题的重要手段。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

NURSING FORUM NURSING-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

4.20%

发文量

151

期刊介绍： Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.