Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) With Biliary Stents in Palliative Treatment of Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001524
Babu P Mohan, Saurabh Chandan, Shahab R Khan, Lena L Kassab, Suresh Ponnada, Everson L A Artifon, Jose P Otoch, Stephanie McDonough, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) With Biliary Stents in Palliative Treatment of Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Babu P Mohan,&nbsp;Saurabh Chandan,&nbsp;Shahab R Khan,&nbsp;Lena L Kassab,&nbsp;Suresh Ponnada,&nbsp;Everson L A Artifon,&nbsp;Jose P Otoch,&nbsp;Stephanie McDonough,&nbsp;Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000001524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Extrahepatic unresectable cholangiocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis. In addition to biliary drainage by stent placement; photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been tried to prolong survival. In this meta-analysis, we appraise the current known data on the use of PDT, RFA in the palliative treatment of extrahepatic unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2020 to identify studies that reported on PDT and RFA. Pooled rates of survival, stent patency, 30-, 90-day mortality, and adverse events were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I2% and 95% prediction interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 studies (2146 patients) were included. A total of 1149 patients underwent treatment with PDT (33 studies), 545 with RFA (22 studies), and 452 patients with stent-only strategy. The pooled survival rate with PDT, RFA, and stent-only groups was 11.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7-13.1] months, 8.1 (95% CI: 6.4-9.9) months, and 6.7 (95% CI: 4.9-8.4) months, respectively. The pooled time of stent patency with PDT, RFA, and stent-only groups was 6.1 (95% CI: 4.2-8) months, 5.5 (95% CI: 4.2-6.7) months, and 4.7 (95% CI: 2.6-6.7) months, respectively. The pooled rate of 30-day mortality with PDT was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.6%-6.7%), with RFA was 7% (95% CI: 4.1%-11.7%) and with stent-only was 4.9% (95% CI: 1.7%-13.1%). The pooled rate of 90-day mortality with PDT was 10.4% (95% CI: 5.4%-19.2%) and with RFA was 16.3% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT seemed to demonstrate better overall survival and 30-day mortality rates than RFA and/or stent-only palliation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":"56 2","pages":"e153-e160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background and aim: Extrahepatic unresectable cholangiocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis. In addition to biliary drainage by stent placement; photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been tried to prolong survival. In this meta-analysis, we appraise the current known data on the use of PDT, RFA in the palliative treatment of extrahepatic unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods: We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2020 to identify studies that reported on PDT and RFA. Pooled rates of survival, stent patency, 30-, 90-day mortality, and adverse events were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I2% and 95% prediction interval.

Results: A total of 55 studies (2146 patients) were included. A total of 1149 patients underwent treatment with PDT (33 studies), 545 with RFA (22 studies), and 452 patients with stent-only strategy. The pooled survival rate with PDT, RFA, and stent-only groups was 11.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7-13.1] months, 8.1 (95% CI: 6.4-9.9) months, and 6.7 (95% CI: 4.9-8.4) months, respectively. The pooled time of stent patency with PDT, RFA, and stent-only groups was 6.1 (95% CI: 4.2-8) months, 5.5 (95% CI: 4.2-6.7) months, and 4.7 (95% CI: 2.6-6.7) months, respectively. The pooled rate of 30-day mortality with PDT was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.6%-6.7%), with RFA was 7% (95% CI: 4.1%-11.7%) and with stent-only was 4.9% (95% CI: 1.7%-13.1%). The pooled rate of 90-day mortality with PDT was 10.4% (95% CI: 5.4%-19.2%) and with RFA was 16.3% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.6%).

Conclusion: PDT seemed to demonstrate better overall survival and 30-day mortality rates than RFA and/or stent-only palliation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光动力疗法(PDT),射频消融(RFA)与胆道支架在不可切除的肝外胆管癌的姑息性治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:肝外不可切除胆管癌预后不佳。除了通过支架置入胆道引流外;光动力治疗(PDT)和射频消融(RFA)已被尝试延长生存期。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了目前已知的PDT、RFA在肝外不可切除胆管癌姑息治疗中的应用数据。方法:我们检索了从成立到2020年7月的多个数据库,以确定报道PDT和RFA的研究。计算总生存率、支架通畅率、30天、90天死亡率和不良事件。采用I2%和95%的预测区间评估研究异质性。结果:共纳入55项研究(2146例患者)。共有1149名患者接受了PDT治疗(33项研究),545名患者接受了RFA治疗(22项研究),452名患者接受了支架治疗。PDT组、RFA组和支架组的总生存率分别为11.9个月(95%可信区间(CI): 10.7-13.1)、8.1个月(95% CI: 6.4-9.9)和6.7个月(95% CI: 4.9-8.4)。PDT组、RFA组和仅支架组支架通畅的总时间分别为6.1 (95% CI: 4.2-8)个月、5.5 (95% CI: 4.2-6.7)个月和4.7 (95% CI: 2.6-6.7)个月。PDT组30天总死亡率为3.3% (95% CI: 1.6%-6.7%), RFA组为7% (95% CI: 4.1%-11.7%),支架组为4.9% (95% CI: 1.7%-13.1%)。PDT组90天总死亡率为10.4% (95% CI: 5.4%-19.2%), RFA组为16.3% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.6%)。结论:PDT似乎比RFA和/或仅支架姑息治疗表现出更好的总生存率和30天死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Liver Disease as a Risk Factor For Post-ERCP Complications: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis. FibroScan Discordance With Liver Biopsy Significantly Overestimates Advanced Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in MASLD Subjects With Class 3 Obesity: Implications for Resmetirom Eligibility. Machine Learning-based Prediction of Mortality Among Malnourished Patients Hospitalized With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The Effectiveness of Budesonide Once Daily as Maintenance Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Value of Spleen Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Predicting Hepatic Vein Pressure Gradient for Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1