Online psychological interventions to improve symptoms in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1111/ane.13709
Brenda Montañés-Masias, Judit Bort-Roig, Juan Carlos Pascual, Joaquim Soler, Laia Briones-Buixassa
{"title":"Online psychological interventions to improve symptoms in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review","authors":"Brenda Montañés-Masias,&nbsp;Judit Bort-Roig,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Pascual,&nbsp;Joaquim Soler,&nbsp;Laia Briones-Buixassa","doi":"10.1111/ane.13709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of Internet-based psychological interventions in the treatment of physical, socio-affective and cognitive symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to provide currently available evidence.</p><p>Systematic searches for eligible studies were carried out in four databases (August 2021) using key words. Studies were screened, data extracted, quality appraised and analysed by three independent reviewers, using predefined criteria and following the PRISMA rules. Study quality was assessed using Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields QUALSYST tool. Physical, socio-affective and cognitive symptoms and QoL were the primary outcomes.</p><p>Thirteen studies were included. Two principal approaches were reported: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based interventions (MBI). Interventions varied from tailored versions to videoconference by a clinician, duration mean 8 weeks, delivered via individually and groups, all online. The review found that iCBT interventions were effective for improve depression, anxiety, fatigue and QoL, and slightly in cognitive functioning in pwMS, whereas MBI interventions reported benefits in depression, anxiety, stress and QoL, and less evidence in fatigue. Generally, study quality was acceptable in most studies; eleven of the studies scored a low risk of bias on all items in the Qualsyst Tool, whereas only two studies were considered unacceptable.</p><p>Psychological online interventions may improve physical, socio-affective and cognitive symptoms as well as QoL in pwMS, overcoming the face-to-face barriers (i.e. disability). Contact with the therapist and groups sessions have been identified as enablers of the online interventions. Nevertheless, the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity of health outcomes reported made difficult to afford robust conclusions on psychological intervention effects in pwMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"146 5","pages":"448-464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ane.13709","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ane.13709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of Internet-based psychological interventions in the treatment of physical, socio-affective and cognitive symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to provide currently available evidence.

Systematic searches for eligible studies were carried out in four databases (August 2021) using key words. Studies were screened, data extracted, quality appraised and analysed by three independent reviewers, using predefined criteria and following the PRISMA rules. Study quality was assessed using Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields QUALSYST tool. Physical, socio-affective and cognitive symptoms and QoL were the primary outcomes.

Thirteen studies were included. Two principal approaches were reported: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based interventions (MBI). Interventions varied from tailored versions to videoconference by a clinician, duration mean 8 weeks, delivered via individually and groups, all online. The review found that iCBT interventions were effective for improve depression, anxiety, fatigue and QoL, and slightly in cognitive functioning in pwMS, whereas MBI interventions reported benefits in depression, anxiety, stress and QoL, and less evidence in fatigue. Generally, study quality was acceptable in most studies; eleven of the studies scored a low risk of bias on all items in the Qualsyst Tool, whereas only two studies were considered unacceptable.

Psychological online interventions may improve physical, socio-affective and cognitive symptoms as well as QoL in pwMS, overcoming the face-to-face barriers (i.e. disability). Contact with the therapist and groups sessions have been identified as enablers of the online interventions. Nevertheless, the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity of health outcomes reported made difficult to afford robust conclusions on psychological intervention effects in pwMS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线心理干预改善多发性硬化症症状:系统综述
本系统综述的目的是评估基于互联网的心理干预在治疗多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者的身体、社会情感和认知症状和生活质量(QoL)方面的有效性,以提供目前可用的证据。使用关键词在四个数据库中系统检索符合条件的研究(2021年8月)。研究经过筛选、数据提取、质量评估和分析,由三名独立审稿人使用预定义的标准并遵循PRISMA规则。研究质量采用评价不同领域主要研究论文的标准质量评价标准QUALSYST工具进行评估。身体、社会情感和认知症状和生活质量是主要结局。纳入了13项研究。两种主要的方法被报道:认知行为疗法(CBT)和基于正念的干预(MBI)。干预措施多种多样,从定制版本到临床医生的视频会议,持续时间平均为8周,通过个人和团体进行,全部在线。回顾发现,iCBT干预对改善抑郁、焦虑、疲劳和生活质量有效,对pwMS患者的认知功能有轻微改善,而MBI干预对抑郁、焦虑、压力和生活质量有改善,对疲劳的证据较少。一般来说,大多数研究的研究质量是可以接受的;在Qualsyst工具的所有项目中,11项研究的偏倚风险为低,而只有两项研究被认为是不可接受的。心理在线干预可以改善pwMS患者的身体、社会情感和认知症状以及生活质量,克服面对面的障碍(即残疾)。与治疗师的联系和小组会议已被确定为在线干预的促成因素。然而,由于研究数量有限,报告的健康结果也存在异质性,因此很难得出关于心理干预对pwMS影响的有力结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
期刊最新文献
Burden of Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Patients Who Had Failed Multiple Preventive Treatments From France, Spain, and the United Kingdom Brain Morphometry Differences Between Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Healthy Individuals in a Middle Eastern Population: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Titin Antibody Is Linked to Increased Hospitalization Rates in Nonthymoma Myasthenia Gravis in Central China The Association of Salivary Cortisol Levels With Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Male Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Case-Control Study Impact of Depression on Cognitive Function and Phenoconversion to Neurodegenerative Diseases in Patients With Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1