The limitations of investigating appetite through circuit manipulations: are we biting off more than we can chew?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Reviews in the Neurosciences Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1515/revneuro-2022-0072
Joshua Wang, Kate Beecher, Fatemeh Chehrehasa, Hayley Moody
{"title":"The limitations of investigating appetite through circuit manipulations: are we biting off more than we can chew?","authors":"Joshua Wang,&nbsp;Kate Beecher,&nbsp;Fatemeh Chehrehasa,&nbsp;Hayley Moody","doi":"10.1515/revneuro-2022-0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disordered eating can underpin a number of debilitating and prevalent chronic diseases, such as obesity. Broader advances in psychopharmacology and biology have motivated some neuroscientists to address diet-induced obesity through reductionist, pre-clinical eating investigations on the rodent brain. Specifically, chemogenetic and optogenetic methods developed in the 21st century allow neuroscientists to perform <i>in vivo</i>, region-specific/projection-specific/promoter-specific circuit manipulations and immediately assess the impact of these manipulations on rodent feeding. These studies are able to rigorously conclude whether a specific neuronal population regulates feeding behaviour in the hope of eventually developing a mechanistic neuroanatomical map of appetite regulation. However, an artificially stimulated/inhibited rodent neuronal population that changes feeding behaviour does not necessarily represent a pharmacological target for treating eating disorders in humans. Chemogenetic/optogenetic findings must therefore be triangulated with the array of theories that contribute to our understanding of appetite. The objective of this review is to provide a wide-ranging discussion of the limitations of chemogenetic/optogenetic circuit manipulation experiments in rodents that are used to investigate appetite. Stepping into and outside of medical science epistemologies, this paper draws on philosophy of science, nutrition, addiction biology and neurophilosophy to prompt more integrative, transdisciplinary interpretations of chemogenetic/optogenetic appetite data. Through discussing the various technical and epistemological limitations of these data, we provide both an overview of chemogenetics and optogenetics accessible to non-neuroscientist obesity researchers, as well as a resource for neuroscientists to expand the number of lenses through which they interpret their circuit manipulation findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49623,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","volume":"34 3","pages":"295-311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2022-0072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disordered eating can underpin a number of debilitating and prevalent chronic diseases, such as obesity. Broader advances in psychopharmacology and biology have motivated some neuroscientists to address diet-induced obesity through reductionist, pre-clinical eating investigations on the rodent brain. Specifically, chemogenetic and optogenetic methods developed in the 21st century allow neuroscientists to perform in vivo, region-specific/projection-specific/promoter-specific circuit manipulations and immediately assess the impact of these manipulations on rodent feeding. These studies are able to rigorously conclude whether a specific neuronal population regulates feeding behaviour in the hope of eventually developing a mechanistic neuroanatomical map of appetite regulation. However, an artificially stimulated/inhibited rodent neuronal population that changes feeding behaviour does not necessarily represent a pharmacological target for treating eating disorders in humans. Chemogenetic/optogenetic findings must therefore be triangulated with the array of theories that contribute to our understanding of appetite. The objective of this review is to provide a wide-ranging discussion of the limitations of chemogenetic/optogenetic circuit manipulation experiments in rodents that are used to investigate appetite. Stepping into and outside of medical science epistemologies, this paper draws on philosophy of science, nutrition, addiction biology and neurophilosophy to prompt more integrative, transdisciplinary interpretations of chemogenetic/optogenetic appetite data. Through discussing the various technical and epistemological limitations of these data, we provide both an overview of chemogenetics and optogenetics accessible to non-neuroscientist obesity researchers, as well as a resource for neuroscientists to expand the number of lenses through which they interpret their circuit manipulation findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过神经回路操作来研究食欲的局限性:我们是否吃了超出我们能力范围的东西?
饮食失调会导致许多使人衰弱和流行的慢性疾病,比如肥胖。精神药理学和生物学的广泛进展促使一些神经科学家通过对啮齿动物大脑进行简化的临床前饮食研究来解决饮食引起的肥胖问题。具体来说,21世纪发展起来的化学遗传学和光遗传学方法使神经科学家能够在体内进行区域特异性/投影特异性/启动子特异性回路操作,并立即评估这些操作对啮齿动物摄食的影响。这些研究能够严格地得出一个特定的神经元群是否调节摄食行为的结论,并希望最终开发出食欲调节的机械神经解剖学图谱。然而,人工刺激/抑制啮齿动物神经元群改变摄食行为并不一定代表治疗人类饮食失调的药理学靶点。因此,化学遗传学/光遗传学的发现必须与一系列有助于我们理解食欲的理论进行三角测量。这篇综述的目的是提供一个广泛的讨论在啮齿类动物中用于研究食欲的化学发生/光遗传电路操作实验的局限性。从医学认识论的角度出发,本文借鉴了科学哲学、营养学、成瘾生物学和神经哲学,以促进对化学发生/光遗传食欲数据的更综合、跨学科的解释。通过讨论这些数据的各种技术和认识论限制,我们为非神经科学家肥胖研究人员提供了化学遗传学和光遗传学的概述,同时也为神经科学家提供了一种资源,以扩大他们解释电路操纵发现的镜头数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Reviews in the Neurosciences 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in the Neurosciences provides a forum for reviews, critical evaluations and theoretical treatment of selective topics in the neurosciences. The journal is meant to provide an authoritative reference work for those interested in the structure and functions of the nervous system at all levels of analysis, including the genetic, molecular, cellular, behavioral, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Contributions should contain a critical appraisal of specific areas and not simply a compilation of published articles.
期刊最新文献
Phase-amplitude coupling during auditory steady-state stimulation: a methodological review. The essential role of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain; a comprehensive review. The role of neuroinflammation in PV interneuron impairments in brain networks; implications for cognitive disorders. Neurological mechanism-based analysis of the role and characteristics of physical activity in the improvement of depressive symptoms. Recent advances on brain drug delivery via nanoparticles: alternative future materials for neuroscience applications; a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1