Examination of geriatric care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 geriatric emergency departments.

Journal of geriatric emergency medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-17 DOI:10.17294/2694-4715.1041
Ilianna Santangelo, Surriya Ahmad, Shan Liu, Lauren T Southerland, Christopher Carpenter, Ula Hwang, Adriane Lesser, Nicole Tidwell, Kevin Biese, Maura Kennedy
{"title":"Examination of geriatric care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 geriatric emergency departments.","authors":"Ilianna Santangelo, Surriya Ahmad, Shan Liu, Lauren T Southerland, Christopher Carpenter, Ula Hwang, Adriane Lesser, Nicole Tidwell, Kevin Biese, Maura Kennedy","doi":"10.17294/2694-4715.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults constitute a large and growing proportion of the population and have unique care needs in the emergency department (ED) setting. The geriatric ED accreditation program aims to improve emergency care provided to older adults by standardizing care provided across accredited geriatric EDs (GED) and through implementation of geriatric-specific care processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate select care processes at accredited level 1 and level 2 GEDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of level 1 and level 2 GEDs that received accreditation between May 7, 2018 and March 1, 2021. We <i>a priori</i> selected five GED care processes for analysis: initiatives related to delirium, screening for dementia, assessment of function and functional decline, geriatric falls, and minimizing medication-related adverse events. For all protocols, a trained research assistant abstracted information on the tool used or care process, which patients received the interventions, and staff members were involved in the care process; additional information was abstracted specific to individual care processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 level 1 and 2 GEDs were included in this analysis. Among care processes studied, geriatric falls were the most common (31 GEDs, 89%) followed by geriatric pain management (25 GEDs, 71%), minimizing the use of potentially inappropriate medications (24 EDs, 69%), delirium (22 GEDs, 63%), medication reconciliation (21 GEDs, 60%), functional assessment (20 GEDs, 57%), and dementia screening (17 GEDs, 49%). For protocols related to delirium, dementia, function, and geriatric falls, sites used an array of different screening tools and there was heterogeneity in who performed the screening and which patients were assessed. Medication reconciliation protocols leveraged pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and/or nurses. Protocols on avoiding potentially inappropriate medication administration generally focused on ED administration of medications and used the BEERs criteria, and few sites indicated whether pain medications protocols had dosing modifications for age and/or renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a snapshot of care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 accredited GEDs and demonstrates significant heterogeny in how these care processes are implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":73757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035774/pdf/nihms-1883085.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults constitute a large and growing proportion of the population and have unique care needs in the emergency department (ED) setting. The geriatric ED accreditation program aims to improve emergency care provided to older adults by standardizing care provided across accredited geriatric EDs (GED) and through implementation of geriatric-specific care processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate select care processes at accredited level 1 and level 2 GEDs.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of level 1 and level 2 GEDs that received accreditation between May 7, 2018 and March 1, 2021. We a priori selected five GED care processes for analysis: initiatives related to delirium, screening for dementia, assessment of function and functional decline, geriatric falls, and minimizing medication-related adverse events. For all protocols, a trained research assistant abstracted information on the tool used or care process, which patients received the interventions, and staff members were involved in the care process; additional information was abstracted specific to individual care processes.

Results: A total of 35 level 1 and 2 GEDs were included in this analysis. Among care processes studied, geriatric falls were the most common (31 GEDs, 89%) followed by geriatric pain management (25 GEDs, 71%), minimizing the use of potentially inappropriate medications (24 EDs, 69%), delirium (22 GEDs, 63%), medication reconciliation (21 GEDs, 60%), functional assessment (20 GEDs, 57%), and dementia screening (17 GEDs, 49%). For protocols related to delirium, dementia, function, and geriatric falls, sites used an array of different screening tools and there was heterogeneity in who performed the screening and which patients were assessed. Medication reconciliation protocols leveraged pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and/or nurses. Protocols on avoiding potentially inappropriate medication administration generally focused on ED administration of medications and used the BEERs criteria, and few sites indicated whether pain medications protocols had dosing modifications for age and/or renal function.

Conclusion: This study provides a snapshot of care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 accredited GEDs and demonstrates significant heterogeny in how these care processes are implemented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查一级和二级老年病急诊科实施的老年病护理流程。
导言:老年人在人口中所占比例很大,而且还在不断增加,他们在急诊科(ED)环境中有着独特的护理需求。老年病急诊室认证计划旨在通过对通过认证的老年病急诊室(GED)提供的护理进行标准化,并通过实施老年病专用护理流程来改善为老年人提供的急诊护理。本研究的目的是评估经认证的一级和二级老年病急诊室的部分护理流程:这是对 2018 年 5 月 7 日至 2021 年 3 月 1 日期间获得认证的 1 级和 2 级 GED 的队列进行的横断面分析。我们事先选择了五个 GED 护理流程进行分析:与谵妄相关的举措、痴呆症筛查、功能和功能衰退评估、老年跌倒以及最大限度减少药物相关不良事件。对于所有方案,一名训练有素的研究助理会摘录所用工具或护理流程、接受干预的患者以及参与护理流程的员工等信息;针对个别护理流程,还会摘录其他信息:本次分析共纳入了 35 项 1 级和 2 级 GED。在所研究的护理流程中,老年跌倒最为常见(31 个 GED,89%),其次是老年疼痛管理(25 个 GED,71%)、尽量减少潜在不当药物的使用(24 个 ED,69%)、谵妄(22 个 GED,63%)、药物调节(21 个 GED,60%)、功能评估(20 个 GED,57%)和痴呆筛查(17 个 GED,49%)。在与谵妄、痴呆、功能和老年跌倒相关的方案中,医疗机构使用了一系列不同的筛查工具,在由谁进行筛查和对哪些患者进行评估方面也存在差异。药物调和协议由药剂师、药剂技师和/或护士执行。关于避免潜在不恰当用药的方案一般侧重于急诊室用药,并使用 BEERs 标准,很少有医疗机构说明止痛药物方案是否根据年龄和/或肾功能对剂量进行了调整:本研究提供了经认证的 1 级和 2 级普通教育机构实施的护理流程的缩影,并展示了这些护理流程在实施方式上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frailty Explains Variation in Emergency Department Use for Older Veterans During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Geriatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Journal Club – Community Paramedicine Older Adult with Transplanted Kidney Failure from Ureteral Obstruction Within a Hernia Bilateral corneal perforations due to elder neglect: a case report Emergency Care of an Older Adult with Complex Care Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1