Variable screening methods in spatial infectious disease transmission models

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sste.2023.100622
Tahmina Akter , Rob Deardon
{"title":"Variable screening methods in spatial infectious disease transmission models","authors":"Tahmina Akter ,&nbsp;Rob Deardon","doi":"10.1016/j.sste.2023.100622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Data-driven mathematical modelling can enrich our understanding of infectious disease spread enormously. Individual-level models of infectious disease transmission allow the incorporation of different individual-level covariates, such as spatial location, vaccination status, etc. This study aims to explore and develop methods for fitting such models when we have many potential covariates to include in the model. The aim is to enhance the performance and interpretability of models and ease the computational burden of fitting these models to data. We have applied and compared multiple variable selection methods in the context of spatial epidemic data. These include a Bayesian two-stage </span>least absolute shrinkage and selection operator<span> (Lasso), forward and backward stepwise selection based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC), spike-and-slab priors, and random variable selection (boosting) methods. We discuss and compare the performance of these methods via simulated datasets and UK 2001 foot-and-mouth disease data. While comparing the variable selection methods all performed consistently well except the two-stage Lasso. We conclude that the spike-and-slab prior method is to be recommended, consistently resulting in high accuracy and short computational time.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":46645,"journal":{"name":"Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187758452300059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data-driven mathematical modelling can enrich our understanding of infectious disease spread enormously. Individual-level models of infectious disease transmission allow the incorporation of different individual-level covariates, such as spatial location, vaccination status, etc. This study aims to explore and develop methods for fitting such models when we have many potential covariates to include in the model. The aim is to enhance the performance and interpretability of models and ease the computational burden of fitting these models to data. We have applied and compared multiple variable selection methods in the context of spatial epidemic data. These include a Bayesian two-stage least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), forward and backward stepwise selection based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC), spike-and-slab priors, and random variable selection (boosting) methods. We discuss and compare the performance of these methods via simulated datasets and UK 2001 foot-and-mouth disease data. While comparing the variable selection methods all performed consistently well except the two-stage Lasso. We conclude that the spike-and-slab prior method is to be recommended, consistently resulting in high accuracy and short computational time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间传染病传播模型中的变量筛选方法
数据驱动的数学模型可以极大地丰富我们对传染病传播的理解。传染病传播的个体水平模型允许纳入不同的个体水平协变量,如空间位置、疫苗接种状况等。本研究旨在探索和发展拟合这些模型的方法,当我们有许多潜在的协变量包含在模型中。其目的是提高模型的性能和可解释性,并减轻将这些模型拟合到数据的计算负担。我们在空间流行病数据背景下应用并比较了多变量选择方法。这些方法包括贝叶斯两阶段最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso)、基于Akaike信息标准(AIC)的向前和向后逐步选择、尖峰-板先验和随机变量选择(增强)方法。我们通过模拟数据集和英国2001年口蹄疫数据讨论并比较了这些方法的性能。在比较变量选择方法时,除两阶段套索法外,其他方法均表现良好。我们的结论是,建议采用尖桩-板先验法,该方法具有较高的精度和较短的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology
Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Association between urban green space and transmission of COVID-19 in Oslo, Norway: A Bayesian SIR modeling approach Employment industry and opioid overdose risk: A pre- and post-COVID-19 comparison in Kentucky and Massachusetts 2018–2021 Editorial Board Spatial pattern of all cause excess mortality in Swiss districts during the pandemic years 1890, 1918 and 2020 Multiple “spaces”: Using wildlife surveillance, climatic variables, and spatial statistics to identify and map a climatic niche for endemic plague in California, U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1