How to leverage the impact of firm-specific uncertainty on innovation performance? Moderating effects of alliance stage and partner type in the pharmaceutical industry

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101781
Hyejae Jung , Junseok Hwang , Eungdo Kim
{"title":"How to leverage the impact of firm-specific uncertainty on innovation performance? Moderating effects of alliance stage and partner type in the pharmaceutical industry","authors":"Hyejae Jung ,&nbsp;Junseok Hwang ,&nbsp;Eungdo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the impact of firm-specific uncertainty on innovation performance and how alliances moderate this relationship in the pharmaceutical industry. To reflect drug research and development (R&amp;D) characteristics, we separate the alliance stage into “preclinical research” and “drug development,” and examine the effects of alliances with different partner types (public and private). An integrated firm-level dataset was created for empirical analysis by combining financial, alliance, patent, and new product data from 96 US pharmaceutical firms. We found that while a firm's uncertainty does not always significantly impact alliance activities, it positively influences certain innovation performance (new products). Furthermore, we probe the moderating effect of alliances on the relationship between uncertainty and innovation performance. The results revealed that alliances with public organizations strengthened the relationship in the “preclinical stage”; however, there was no significant effect in the “drug development” stage. Also, alliances with private firms even negatively moderates in “drug development stage” in some innovation performance. This study provides novel evidence that alliances can mitigate or exacerbate innovation performance depending on the alliance stage and partner type.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474823000516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of firm-specific uncertainty on innovation performance and how alliances moderate this relationship in the pharmaceutical industry. To reflect drug research and development (R&D) characteristics, we separate the alliance stage into “preclinical research” and “drug development,” and examine the effects of alliances with different partner types (public and private). An integrated firm-level dataset was created for empirical analysis by combining financial, alliance, patent, and new product data from 96 US pharmaceutical firms. We found that while a firm's uncertainty does not always significantly impact alliance activities, it positively influences certain innovation performance (new products). Furthermore, we probe the moderating effect of alliances on the relationship between uncertainty and innovation performance. The results revealed that alliances with public organizations strengthened the relationship in the “preclinical stage”; however, there was no significant effect in the “drug development” stage. Also, alliances with private firms even negatively moderates in “drug development stage” in some innovation performance. This study provides novel evidence that alliances can mitigate or exacerbate innovation performance depending on the alliance stage and partner type.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何利用企业特有的不确定性对创新绩效的影响?医药行业联盟阶段和合作伙伴类型的调节效应
本研究探讨制药行业企业特定不确定性对创新绩效的影响,以及联盟如何调节这种关系。为了反映药物研发(R&D)的特点,我们将联盟阶段分为“临床前研究”和“药物开发”,并考察了不同合作伙伴类型(公共和私营)联盟的效果。通过结合96家美国制药公司的财务、联盟、专利和新产品数据,创建了一个集成的企业层面数据集,用于实证分析。研究发现,虽然企业的不确定性并不总是显著影响联盟活动,但它正向影响某些创新绩效(新产品)。此外,我们还探讨了联盟对不确定性与创新绩效之间关系的调节作用。结果表明,与公共组织的联盟在“临床前阶段”加强了关系;然而,在“药物开发”阶段没有显著的影响。此外,与私营企业的联盟甚至在“药物开发阶段”对某些创新绩效起到负调节作用。本研究提供了新的证据,证明联盟可以减轻或加剧创新绩效,这取决于联盟阶段和合作伙伴类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.
期刊最新文献
How to design prototypes to prevent potential dominant logic conflict during the iterative learning process Patent pool and dominant design: An empirical study of patent pool from MPEG-LA Accelerating corporate innovation ecosystems: The exprivia business incubator case study Rethinking the trade-off relationship between innovation quantity and quality: the evidence from public energy R&D programs in South Korea Digital servitization strategies and business model innovation: The role of knowledge-intensive business services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1