Implementation of new indicators of pediatric malnutrition and comparison to previous indicators

Mai Adnan Ezzat , Ebtsam Mohmmed Albassam , Eman Abdullah Aldajani , Raneem Abdulaziz Alaskar , Edward Bentz Devol
{"title":"Implementation of new indicators of pediatric malnutrition and comparison to previous indicators","authors":"Mai Adnan Ezzat ,&nbsp;Ebtsam Mohmmed Albassam ,&nbsp;Eman Abdullah Aldajani ,&nbsp;Raneem Abdulaziz Alaskar ,&nbsp;Edward Bentz Devol","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpam.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early identification of childhood malnutrition is imperative to improve overall health outcomes, and more importantly, to start early intervention to decrease the risk of future complications. This study aimed to evaluate new malnutrition Z-score growth indicators for detecting pediatric malnutrition and degrees of severity and compare their accuracy with that of growth chart centiles.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 475 pediatric patients from several pediatric nutrition clinics for six months. The participant's weight, height, age, and growth parameters were recorded using both traditional growth charts (centiles) and updated malnutrition indicators (z-scores). The percentage and degree of malnutrition using centiles and Z-scores were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In children aged &lt;2 years, the percentage of malnutrition was 4.7% higher when measured using new malnutrition indicators (weight-for-length Z-score) compared with (weight-for-length centiles). Our results also showed 9.6% higher number of malnourished children &gt;2 years of age when BMI-for-age Z-score was used compared to weight-for-height centiles while there were 15.8% higher malnourished children when BMI-for-age Z-score was compared to BMI-for-age centiles for the same group. We found a significant difference (X<sup>2</sup> = 202.548, <em>P</em>=&lt;.0001) between the degree of malnutrition in children aged &gt;2 years using BMI-for-age Z-score (normal vs. malnourished) and the degree of malnutrition using BMI centiles (normal vs. malnourished). Approximately 34% of the children classified as normal using centiles were classified as malnourished using Z-scores. Comparing the degrees of Malnutrition, approximately 23% (45 of 196) of children classified as normal based on centiles were classified as having mild malnutrition when Z-scores were used, and 42% (80 of 192) of children who were classified as having mild malnutrition based on centiles were classified as having moderate malnutrition when Z-scores were used.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our study, a higher percentage of children showed malnutrition when assessed using the Z-score (BMI-for-age for children &gt;2 years/weight-for-length for children &lt;2 years of age) than the centiles growth chart.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36646,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/86/main.PMC10019954.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352646722000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early identification of childhood malnutrition is imperative to improve overall health outcomes, and more importantly, to start early intervention to decrease the risk of future complications. This study aimed to evaluate new malnutrition Z-score growth indicators for detecting pediatric malnutrition and degrees of severity and compare their accuracy with that of growth chart centiles.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study included 475 pediatric patients from several pediatric nutrition clinics for six months. The participant's weight, height, age, and growth parameters were recorded using both traditional growth charts (centiles) and updated malnutrition indicators (z-scores). The percentage and degree of malnutrition using centiles and Z-scores were compared.

Results

In children aged <2 years, the percentage of malnutrition was 4.7% higher when measured using new malnutrition indicators (weight-for-length Z-score) compared with (weight-for-length centiles). Our results also showed 9.6% higher number of malnourished children >2 years of age when BMI-for-age Z-score was used compared to weight-for-height centiles while there were 15.8% higher malnourished children when BMI-for-age Z-score was compared to BMI-for-age centiles for the same group. We found a significant difference (X2 = 202.548, P=<.0001) between the degree of malnutrition in children aged >2 years using BMI-for-age Z-score (normal vs. malnourished) and the degree of malnutrition using BMI centiles (normal vs. malnourished). Approximately 34% of the children classified as normal using centiles were classified as malnourished using Z-scores. Comparing the degrees of Malnutrition, approximately 23% (45 of 196) of children classified as normal based on centiles were classified as having mild malnutrition when Z-scores were used, and 42% (80 of 192) of children who were classified as having mild malnutrition based on centiles were classified as having moderate malnutrition when Z-scores were used.

Conclusions

In our study, a higher percentage of children showed malnutrition when assessed using the Z-score (BMI-for-age for children >2 years/weight-for-length for children <2 years of age) than the centiles growth chart.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施新的儿科营养不良指标,并与以前的指标进行比较
背景:准确识别儿童营养不良对于改善整体健康状况至关重要,更重要的是,对于开始早期干预以降低未来并发症的风险。本研究旨在评估用于检测儿童营养不良和严重程度的新的营养不良z评分生长指标,并将其与生长图百分位数的准确性进行比较。患者和方法本回顾性研究包括来自几个儿科营养诊所的475名儿童患者,为期6个月。使用传统的生长图表(百分位)和更新的营养不良指标(z分数)记录参与者的体重、身高、年龄和生长参数。用百分位和z分数比较营养不良的百分比和程度。结果在2岁儿童中,使用新的营养不良指标(身高体重z分数)与(身高体重百分位数)相比,营养不良的百分比高4.7%。我们的研究结果还显示,与体重身高百分位数相比,使用bmi年龄z分数的2岁儿童营养不良的人数增加了9.6%,而在同一组中,使用bmi年龄z分数的2岁儿童营养不良的人数比使用bmi年龄百分位数的2岁儿童多15.8%。我们发现2岁以下儿童的营养不良程度(使用BMI-年龄Z-score(正常vs营养不良))和营养不良程度(使用BMI百分位数(正常vs营养不良))之间存在显著差异(X2 = 202.548, P=< 0.0001)。使用百分位数分类为正常的儿童中,约有34%的儿童使用z分数分类为营养不良。比较营养不良程度,当使用z分数时,根据百分位数划分为正常的儿童中约有23%(196人中有45人)被划分为轻度营养不良,而根据百分位数划分为轻度营养不良的儿童中有42%(192人中有80人)被划分为中度营养不良。在我们的研究中,使用Z-score(2岁儿童的年龄bmi / 2岁儿童的身高体重)评估时,出现营养不良的儿童比例高于百分位生长图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The ethics of “net-risk” pediatric research:Views of IRB members and the US public Epiploic appendagitis: Not so unusual cause of paediatric abdominal pain Cerebral venous thrombosis in adolescence: Looking beyond the obvious Clinical characterization of pediatric supratentorial tumors and prediction of pituitary insufficiency in two tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia Outcomes of blood and marrow transplantation in children less than 2-years of age: 23 years of experience at a single center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1