Evaluation of methods to eliminate analytical interference in multiple myeloma patients with spurious hyperphosphatemia.

Xin Tian, Li Zhao, Jin Ma, Jie Lu, Tian-Yi Zhu, Yan Liu, Hong-Xun Sun
{"title":"Evaluation of methods to eliminate analytical interference in multiple myeloma patients with spurious hyperphosphatemia.","authors":"Xin Tian, Li Zhao, Jin Ma, Jie Lu, Tian-Yi Zhu, Yan Liu, Hong-Xun Sun","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The acid/molybdate assay performed on the Beckman Coulter AU5821 could be subject to paraprotein interference, which potentially results in spurious hyperphosphatemia. We attempted to find a reliable solution to eliminate paraprotein interference in laboratory test results and discuss the causes of paraprotein interference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We observed 50 multiple myeloma patients with serum paraproteins. We used the trichloroacetic acid (TCA) deproteinizing method to confirm that paraproteins indeed interfered with phosphate detection in the serum acid/molybdate assay. Furthermore, we used the dry chemical method (Vitros 5.1 FS, Johnson) and deionized water (H2O), normal saline (NS), and healthy human serum as alternative diluents. We assessed the clinical acceptability of the 4 methods by evaluating a bias percentage (bias%) lower than 10% under the premise of TCA treatment as a serum phosphate reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, comparing the results of the TCA treatment on the Beckman Coulter AU5821, 3/50 (6%) multiple myeloma patients exhibited phosphate pseudo-elevation (bias% >10%). Additionally, we found pseudo-hypophosphate only in immunoglobulin (Ig)G-kappa paraprotein samples, and all were above 50 g/L. The bias% between TCA and dry chemical method for the 3 patients was below 10%. The maximum acceptable dilutions for patient 22 were 8-fold H2O, 4-fold H2O , and 2-fold serum; those for patient 45 were 16-fold H2O, 16-fold H2O, and 2-fold serum. However, the bias% of patient 40 was beyond the acceptable range in all 3 dilution groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High concentrations of IgG kappa-type paraproteins are more likely to interfere with serum phosphorous detection. Both the TCA and dry chemical method can effectively eliminate paraprotein interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"598-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The acid/molybdate assay performed on the Beckman Coulter AU5821 could be subject to paraprotein interference, which potentially results in spurious hyperphosphatemia. We attempted to find a reliable solution to eliminate paraprotein interference in laboratory test results and discuss the causes of paraprotein interference.

Methods: We observed 50 multiple myeloma patients with serum paraproteins. We used the trichloroacetic acid (TCA) deproteinizing method to confirm that paraproteins indeed interfered with phosphate detection in the serum acid/molybdate assay. Furthermore, we used the dry chemical method (Vitros 5.1 FS, Johnson) and deionized water (H2O), normal saline (NS), and healthy human serum as alternative diluents. We assessed the clinical acceptability of the 4 methods by evaluating a bias percentage (bias%) lower than 10% under the premise of TCA treatment as a serum phosphate reference method.

Results: In total, comparing the results of the TCA treatment on the Beckman Coulter AU5821, 3/50 (6%) multiple myeloma patients exhibited phosphate pseudo-elevation (bias% >10%). Additionally, we found pseudo-hypophosphate only in immunoglobulin (Ig)G-kappa paraprotein samples, and all were above 50 g/L. The bias% between TCA and dry chemical method for the 3 patients was below 10%. The maximum acceptable dilutions for patient 22 were 8-fold H2O, 4-fold H2O , and 2-fold serum; those for patient 45 were 16-fold H2O, 16-fold H2O, and 2-fold serum. However, the bias% of patient 40 was beyond the acceptable range in all 3 dilution groups.

Conclusion: High concentrations of IgG kappa-type paraproteins are more likely to interfere with serum phosphorous detection. Both the TCA and dry chemical method can effectively eliminate paraprotein interference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除多发性骨髓瘤患者假性高磷血症分析干扰的方法评价。
目的:在Beckman-Coulter AU5821上进行的酸/钼酸盐测定可能会受到副蛋白干扰,这可能会导致假高磷血症。我们试图找到一种可靠的解决方案来消除实验室测试结果中的副蛋白干扰,并讨论副蛋白干扰的原因。方法:对50例多发性骨髓瘤患者血清副蛋白进行观察。我们使用三氯乙酸(TCA)脱蛋白方法来证实副蛋白确实干扰了血清酸/钼酸盐测定中的磷酸盐检测。此外,我们使用干化学法(Vitros 5.1 FS,Johnson)和去离子水(H2O)、生理盐水(NS)和健康人血清作为替代稀释剂。在TCA治疗作为血清磷酸盐参考方法的前提下,我们通过评估低于10%的偏倚百分比(偏倚%)来评估这4种方法的临床可接受性。结果:总的来说,比较TCA治疗Beckman Coulter AU5821的结果,3/50(6%)多发性骨髓瘤患者表现出磷酸盐假性升高(偏倚%>10%)。此外,我们只在免疫球蛋白(Ig)G-kappa副蛋白样品中发现了伪次磷酸盐,并且所有样品都在50 G/L以上。三名患者的TCA和干化学法之间的偏差%低于10%。患者22的最大可接受稀释度为8倍H2O、4倍H2O和2倍血清;患者45的那些是16倍H2O、16倍H2O和2倍血清。然而,在所有3个稀释组中,患者40的偏倚%都超出了可接受的范围。结论:高浓度的IgGκ型副蛋白更容易干扰血清磷的检测。TCA法和干化学法均能有效消除副蛋白干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robert L. Schmidt, MD, PhD, MBA (November 17, 1952-October 25, 2023) A 6-year-old boy with an atypical liver neoplasm harboring a novel RPS6KA3 variant. Evaluating direct amplification from viral transport medium for SARS-CoV-2 detection, strain typing, and angiotensin-converting enzyme genotyping and expression assays. Diagnostic value of pleural effusion Krebs von den Lungen-6 in malignant pleural effusion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Genetic analysis of TMPRSS6 catalytic domain variants in Mexican patients with iron treatment refractoriness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1