Rapid testing methods for the detection of methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus

MS, M(ASCP), SM, DLM Narinder K. Midha (Assistant Director)
{"title":"Rapid testing methods for the detection of methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus","authors":"MS, M(ASCP), SM, DLM Narinder K. Midha (Assistant Director)","doi":"10.1016/S1069-417X(00)80028-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Appropriate early antimicrobial therapy of patients with serious infections caused by <em>S. aureus</em> is well recognized as an important factor for a favorable outcome. The fact that MRSA strains often are multi-resistant leaves only few antibiotics available for the therapy of MRSA infections. As a consequence, clinicians in many countries resort to the use of glycopeptides to broadly cover the patient for a possible MRSA infection until the results of cultures and susceptibility testing are available. Such use of glycopeptides clearly increases the selective pressure for vancomycin resistance, an issue which is of great concern in view of the increasing problem with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Moreover, there is an additional risk that the overuse of vancomycin may lead to the development of vancomycin-resistant stains of MRSA, a situation for which no treatment would be available! Finally, therapy with glycopeptides results in higher cost as compared to ß-lactamase stable penicillins due to the higher cost of the drug as well as higher associated costs of therapy such as vancomycin levels. Rapid/accurate detection of MRS A is important in order to decrease the use of glycopeptide antibiotics. Furthermore, rapid and accurate detection increases the possibilities of reducing or even controlling the spread of MRSA. DNAbased rapid assays have been developed and should be available commercially soon. At present, these rapid assays are also being evaluated against methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci (CNST). Such resistance is also encoded by the <em>mecA</em> gene. CNST infections are increasing, especially in immunocompromised patients with methicillin resistance being very common in these strains. The existing phenotypic susceptibility methods detection of methicillin resistance is so unreliable when testing CNST that many clinicians choose to treat with glycopeptide antibiotics regardless of the test results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100102,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobics and Infectious Diseases Newsletter","volume":"16 8","pages":"Pages 62-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1069-417X(00)80028-X","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobics and Infectious Diseases Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1069417X0080028X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Appropriate early antimicrobial therapy of patients with serious infections caused by S. aureus is well recognized as an important factor for a favorable outcome. The fact that MRSA strains often are multi-resistant leaves only few antibiotics available for the therapy of MRSA infections. As a consequence, clinicians in many countries resort to the use of glycopeptides to broadly cover the patient for a possible MRSA infection until the results of cultures and susceptibility testing are available. Such use of glycopeptides clearly increases the selective pressure for vancomycin resistance, an issue which is of great concern in view of the increasing problem with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Moreover, there is an additional risk that the overuse of vancomycin may lead to the development of vancomycin-resistant stains of MRSA, a situation for which no treatment would be available! Finally, therapy with glycopeptides results in higher cost as compared to ß-lactamase stable penicillins due to the higher cost of the drug as well as higher associated costs of therapy such as vancomycin levels. Rapid/accurate detection of MRS A is important in order to decrease the use of glycopeptide antibiotics. Furthermore, rapid and accurate detection increases the possibilities of reducing or even controlling the spread of MRSA. DNAbased rapid assays have been developed and should be available commercially soon. At present, these rapid assays are also being evaluated against methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci (CNST). Such resistance is also encoded by the mecA gene. CNST infections are increasing, especially in immunocompromised patients with methicillin resistance being very common in these strains. The existing phenotypic susceptibility methods detection of methicillin resistance is so unreliable when testing CNST that many clinicians choose to treat with glycopeptide antibiotics regardless of the test results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌快速检测方法
对金黄色葡萄球菌引起的严重感染患者进行适当的早期抗菌治疗是获得良好结果的重要因素。MRSA菌株通常具有多重耐药的事实使得只有少数抗生素可用于治疗MRSA感染。因此,许多国家的临床医生在获得培养和药敏试验结果之前,采用糖肽广泛覆盖可能感染MRSA的患者。这种糖肽的使用显然增加了万古霉素耐药的选择压力,鉴于万古霉素耐药肠球菌的问题日益严重,这一问题值得高度关注。此外,过度使用万古霉素还有一个额外的风险,可能导致MRSA万古霉素耐药菌株的发展,这种情况没有治疗方法!最后,与ß-内酰胺酶稳定的青霉素相比,糖肽治疗的成本更高,因为药物的成本更高,以及万古霉素水平等治疗的相关成本更高。为了减少糖肽类抗生素的使用,快速/准确地检测MRS A非常重要。此外,快速和准确的检测增加了减少甚至控制MRSA传播的可能性。基于dna的快速检测方法已经开发出来,应该很快就能商业化。目前,这些快速检测方法也正在评估凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNST)对甲氧西林的耐药性。这种抗性也是由mecA基因编码的。CNST感染正在增加,特别是在免疫功能低下的患者中,甲氧西林耐药性在这些菌株中非常常见。现有的检测甲氧西林耐药性的表型敏感性方法在检测CNST时非常不可靠,以至于许多临床医生不顾检测结果而选择糖肽类抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cerebral epidural abscess and review of central nervous system infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes The cost of microbial resistance Recurrent Staphylococcus lugdunensis central nervous system infection associated with a ventricular peritoneal shunt Index to volume 18 Chloramphenicol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1