An analysis of ensemble pruning methods under the explanation of Random Forest

IF 3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.is.2023.102310
Faten A. Khalifa, Hatem M. Abdelkader, Asmaa H. Elsaid
{"title":"An analysis of ensemble pruning methods under the explanation of Random Forest","authors":"Faten A. Khalifa,&nbsp;Hatem M. Abdelkader,&nbsp;Asmaa H. Elsaid","doi":"10.1016/j.is.2023.102310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span><span>“Black box” models created by modern machine learning techniques are typically hard to interpret. Thus, the necessity of </span>explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has grown for understanding the rationale behind those models and converting them into white boxes. </span>Random Forest is a black box model essential in various domains due to its flexibility, ease of use, and remarkable </span>predictive performance<span>. One method for explaining a Random Forest is transforming it into a self-explainable Decision Tree using Forest-Based Tree (FBT) algorithm. It basically consists of three main phases, pruning, conjunction set generation, and Decision Tree construction. In this paper, we examine six state-of-the-art pruning approaches and analyze their effect on FBT performance through pruned FBT (PFBT) in order to minimize its </span></span>computational complexity. This would make it appropriate for forests and datasets of any size. They are assessed on 30 datasets, and the results show that UMEP and Hybrid pruning methods can be effectively used in the pruning stage of the PFBT algorithm in terms of pruning time and predictive performance. However, the AUC-Greedy method achieves good performance with small-size datasets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50363,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437923001461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Black box” models created by modern machine learning techniques are typically hard to interpret. Thus, the necessity of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has grown for understanding the rationale behind those models and converting them into white boxes. Random Forest is a black box model essential in various domains due to its flexibility, ease of use, and remarkable predictive performance. One method for explaining a Random Forest is transforming it into a self-explainable Decision Tree using Forest-Based Tree (FBT) algorithm. It basically consists of three main phases, pruning, conjunction set generation, and Decision Tree construction. In this paper, we examine six state-of-the-art pruning approaches and analyze their effect on FBT performance through pruned FBT (PFBT) in order to minimize its computational complexity. This would make it appropriate for forests and datasets of any size. They are assessed on 30 datasets, and the results show that UMEP and Hybrid pruning methods can be effectively used in the pruning stage of the PFBT algorithm in terms of pruning time and predictive performance. However, the AUC-Greedy method achieves good performance with small-size datasets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机森林解释下的集合剪枝方法分析
由现代机器学习技术创建的“黑匣子”模型通常很难解释。因此,为了理解这些模型背后的基本原理并将其转换为白盒,可解释的人工智能(XAI)的必要性已经增长。随机森林是一种黑盒模型,由于其灵活性,易用性和卓越的预测性能在各个领域都是必不可少的。一种解释随机森林的方法是利用基于森林的树(Forest- based Tree, FBT)算法将随机森林转化为可自我解释的决策树。它主要包括三个阶段:剪枝、连接集生成和决策树构建。在本文中,我们研究了六种最先进的修剪方法,并通过修剪FBT (PFBT)来分析它们对FBT性能的影响,以最小化其计算复杂度。这将使它适用于任何规模的森林和数据集。在30个数据集上进行了评估,结果表明,从剪枝时间和预测性能方面来看,UMEP和Hybrid剪枝方法可以有效地用于PFBT算法的剪枝阶段。然而,AUC-Greedy方法在小数据集上取得了很好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems
Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
112
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Information systems are the software and hardware systems that support data-intensive applications. The journal Information Systems publishes articles concerning the design and implementation of languages, data models, process models, algorithms, software and hardware for information systems. Subject areas include data management issues as presented in the principal international database conferences (e.g., ACM SIGMOD/PODS, VLDB, ICDE and ICDT/EDBT) as well as data-related issues from the fields of data mining/machine learning, information retrieval coordinated with structured data, internet and cloud data management, business process management, web semantics, visual and audio information systems, scientific computing, and data science. Implementation papers having to do with massively parallel data management, fault tolerance in practice, and special purpose hardware for data-intensive systems are also welcome. Manuscripts from application domains, such as urban informatics, social and natural science, and Internet of Things, are also welcome. All papers should highlight innovative solutions to data management problems such as new data models, performance enhancements, and show how those innovations contribute to the goals of the application.
期刊最新文献
Effective data exploration through clustering of local attributive explanations Data Lakehouse: A survey and experimental study Temporal graph processing in modern memory hierarchies Bridging reading and mapping: The role of reading annotations in facilitating feedback while concept mapping A universal approach for simplified redundancy-aware cross-model querying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1