Radiological evaluation of cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty with or without interface bioactive bone cement technique

Kazutaka Watanabe , Takkan Morishima , Hiromi Otsuka , Tatsunori Ikemoto , Kohei Hashimoto , Hiroshi Fujita , Nobunori Takahashi
{"title":"Radiological evaluation of cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty with or without interface bioactive bone cement technique","authors":"Kazutaka Watanabe ,&nbsp;Takkan Morishima ,&nbsp;Hiromi Otsuka ,&nbsp;Tatsunori Ikemoto ,&nbsp;Kohei Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Fujita ,&nbsp;Nobunori Takahashi","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We evaluated the medium-term radiological outcomes of the interface bioactive bone cement (IBBC) technique used in the acetabular component in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 79 patients (88 hips) who underwent primary THA at our hospital between January 2004 and April 2009 were divided into the non-IBBC (NIBBC; n ​= ​39 patients, 44 hips) and IBBC (n ​= ​40 patients, 44 hips) groups. A clear zone (CZ) at the cement-bone interface around the cup was evaluated 5 and 10 years postoperatively. The CZ score, which indicates the spread of the CZ, and loosening of the cup (CZ ​&gt; ​2 ​mm on all sides or movement of the cup &gt;4°) were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No patient had loosening of the cup. The mean patient age at surgery was 66.5 ​± ​9.2 years in the NIBBC group and 61.9 ​± ​7.7 years in the IBBC group (p ​= ​0.012). At 5 years postoperatively, the incidence of CZ was 36.4 ​% in the NIBBC group and 18.2 ​% in the IBBC group (p ​= ​0.056). At 10 years postoperatively, the incidence of CZ was 36.4 ​% in the NIBBC group and 20.1 ​% in the IBBC group (p ​= ​0.098). Age at surgery (p ​= ​0.045) significantly affected the incidence of CZ at 5 years but not at 10 years. The IBBC technique (p ​= ​0.042) and age at surgery (p ​= ​0.028) significantly affected the CZ score at 5 years. The IBBC technique (p ​= ​0.036) significantly affected the CZ score at 10 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The IBBC technique resulted in a significantly lower CZ score than the NIBBC technique in patients undergoing THA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 234-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000361/pdfft?md5=5e61b406113934ff3e918250f7bec777&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705123000361-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the medium-term radiological outcomes of the interface bioactive bone cement (IBBC) technique used in the acetabular component in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

In total, 79 patients (88 hips) who underwent primary THA at our hospital between January 2004 and April 2009 were divided into the non-IBBC (NIBBC; n ​= ​39 patients, 44 hips) and IBBC (n ​= ​40 patients, 44 hips) groups. A clear zone (CZ) at the cement-bone interface around the cup was evaluated 5 and 10 years postoperatively. The CZ score, which indicates the spread of the CZ, and loosening of the cup (CZ ​> ​2 ​mm on all sides or movement of the cup >4°) were also evaluated.

Results

No patient had loosening of the cup. The mean patient age at surgery was 66.5 ​± ​9.2 years in the NIBBC group and 61.9 ​± ​7.7 years in the IBBC group (p ​= ​0.012). At 5 years postoperatively, the incidence of CZ was 36.4 ​% in the NIBBC group and 18.2 ​% in the IBBC group (p ​= ​0.056). At 10 years postoperatively, the incidence of CZ was 36.4 ​% in the NIBBC group and 20.1 ​% in the IBBC group (p ​= ​0.098). Age at surgery (p ​= ​0.045) significantly affected the incidence of CZ at 5 years but not at 10 years. The IBBC technique (p ​= ​0.042) and age at surgery (p ​= ​0.028) significantly affected the CZ score at 5 years. The IBBC technique (p ​= ​0.036) significantly affected the CZ score at 10 years.

Conclusions

The IBBC technique resulted in a significantly lower CZ score than the NIBBC technique in patients undergoing THA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用或不采用界面生物活性骨水泥技术的初次全髋关节置换术中骨水泥髋臼假体的放射学评价
目的评价界面生物活性骨水泥(IBBC)技术用于首次骨水泥全髋关节置换术(THA)髋臼假体的中期放射学效果。方法将2004年1月至2009年4月在我院行原发性全髋关节置换术的79例患者(88髋)分为非全髋关节置换术组(NIBBC;n = 39例,44髋)和IBBC组(n = 40例,44髋)。术后5年和10年评估杯周围水泥-骨界面的清晰区(CZ)。CZ分数,表示CZ的扩散程度,以及杯子的松动程度(CZ >还评估了杯口两侧2mm或杯口运动(gt;4°)。结果所有患者均无杯套松动。NIBBC组的平均手术年龄为66.5±9.2岁,IBBC组的平均手术年龄为61.9±7.7岁(p = 0.012)。术后5年,NIBBC组CZ发生率为36.4%,IBBC组为18.2% (p = 0.056)。术后10年,NIBBC组CZ发生率为36.4%,IBBC组为20.1% (p = 0.098)。手术年龄(p = 0.045)对5岁时CZ的发生率有显著影响,但对10岁时无显著影响。IBBC技术(p = 0.042)和手术年龄(p = 0.028)显著影响5年时CZ评分。IBBC技术显著影响10年CZ评分(p = 0.036)。结论在全髋关节置换术中,IBBC技术的CZ评分明显低于NIBBC技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiological evaluation of coronal femoral and tibial morphology and coronal limb alignment in windswept deformity of the knee Lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Narrative review on current evidence Predictive symptoms associated with the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a 10-year longitudinal study from the Iwaki cohort Achievement of minimal clinically important difference in shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study Classification of coronal plane alignment of arthritic and healthy knees in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1