Carbon footprint of general practice: Retrospective case study of GP offices in a rural department of France

Claire Houziel , Emmanuel Prothon , Albert Trinh-Duc
{"title":"Carbon footprint of general practice: Retrospective case study of GP offices in a rural department of France","authors":"Claire Houziel ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Prothon ,&nbsp;Albert Trinh-Duc","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The medical sector has a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions which, in turn, impacts global health. In the context of the climate emergency, measures should be adopted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the health care sector. So far, few regulations have been implemented for general practice facilities, despite the fact that the potential impact of general practice is large, due to the size of this sector. This study seeks to establish the carbon footprint of general practices in a rural French department, and to identify the main vectors of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Three general practitioners’ offices located in Lot-et-Garonne agreed to participate in this study. This retrospective study extrapolated the carbon footprint of the practices during 2020 using the ADEME BEGES method and Life Cycle Assessment. We collected data and accounting reports directly from practices regarding different potential CO<sub>2</sub> emission sources (electricity, water, transport, waste, digital activities, stationery, and medical equipment).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Medical practices emitted an average of 39.8t of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent in 2020, i.e. 1.5 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>eq per consultation. Transportation was the main vector of emissions with 95 % of the total (83 % via patient transportation and 12 % via physician transportation), followed by medical equipment (3 %), electricity consumption (1.1 %), office supplies (0.7 %), digital activities (0.1 %), then water and waste (both, &lt; 0.1 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>General Practice generates a significant amount of CO<sub>2</sub> and, therefore, requires specific actions to be implemented to reduce its impact on the environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300072X/pdfft?md5=4162d665038e9b99436144a7ef614fed&pid=1-s2.0-S266727822300072X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300072X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The medical sector has a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions which, in turn, impacts global health. In the context of the climate emergency, measures should be adopted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the health care sector. So far, few regulations have been implemented for general practice facilities, despite the fact that the potential impact of general practice is large, due to the size of this sector. This study seeks to establish the carbon footprint of general practices in a rural French department, and to identify the main vectors of CO2 emissions.

Materials and Methods

Three general practitioners’ offices located in Lot-et-Garonne agreed to participate in this study. This retrospective study extrapolated the carbon footprint of the practices during 2020 using the ADEME BEGES method and Life Cycle Assessment. We collected data and accounting reports directly from practices regarding different potential CO2 emission sources (electricity, water, transport, waste, digital activities, stationery, and medical equipment).

Results

Medical practices emitted an average of 39.8t of CO2 equivalent in 2020, i.e. 1.5 kg of CO2eq per consultation. Transportation was the main vector of emissions with 95 % of the total (83 % via patient transportation and 12 % via physician transportation), followed by medical equipment (3 %), electricity consumption (1.1 %), office supplies (0.7 %), digital activities (0.1 %), then water and waste (both, < 0.1 %).

Conclusion

General Practice generates a significant amount of CO2 and, therefore, requires specific actions to be implemented to reduce its impact on the environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般实践的碳足迹:法国农村部门全科医生办公室的回顾性案例研究
医疗部门对温室气体排放有重大影响,而温室气体排放反过来又影响全球健康。在气候紧急情况的背景下,应采取措施减少卫生保健部门的温室气体排放。到目前为止,针对全科医疗设施实施的法规很少,尽管由于该行业的规模,全科医疗的潜在影响很大。本研究旨在建立法国农村部门一般做法的碳足迹,并确定二氧化碳排放的主要载体。材料与方法位于Lot-et-Garonne的三家全科医生办公室同意参与本研究。这项回顾性研究使用ADEME BEGES方法和生命周期评估来推断2020年期间这些实践的碳足迹。我们直接从不同的潜在二氧化碳排放源(电力、水、交通、废物、数字活动、文具和医疗设备)的实践中收集数据和会计报告。结果2020年医疗实践平均排放39.8t CO2当量,即每次咨询1.5 kg CO2当量。交通运输是主要的排放载体,占总排放量的95%(83%通过患者运输,12%通过医生运输),其次是医疗设备(3%),电力消耗(1.1%),办公用品(0.7%),数字活动(0.1%),然后是水和废物(两者都是,<0.1%)。一般实践产生大量的二氧化碳,因此,需要采取具体行动来减少其对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Climate emotions, parenting plans, and racial difference in the United States Impact of climate change on rheumatic diseases: A scoping review Rapid review of the impacts of climate change on the health system workforce and implications for action The human health burden of climate change: Non-economic losses and ethical considerations towards achieving planetary health Impact of extreme heat and heatwaves on children's health: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1